I currently have a dual Athlon XP 1600 machine and am thinking of upgrading. I had a render that took 9 days to finish.
I am curious about the performance of the P4 HT chips vs dual cpus, as I would like to upgrade soon. Assuming a few hundered dollars isn't really a big deal, which would you recommend?:
Upgrade current rig to a pair of 2600+s (only a 266Mhz FSB)
Replace rig with P4 3.2Ghz
I do use both CPUs quite a bit for rendering and video editing, plus just having a lot of crap running all at once, and have grown to like them. But, I think the HT technology in the P4s would please fairly well too. What would you recommend? And please, no "P4 cause AMD sux!" type comments.
Never have I seen so many great minds bent on such small a task.

Upgrade current rig to a pair of 2600+s (only a 266Mhz FSB)
Replace rig with P4 3.2Ghz
I do use both CPUs quite a bit for rendering and video editing, plus just having a lot of crap running all at once, and have grown to like them. But, I think the HT technology in the P4s would please fairly well too. What would you recommend? And please, no "P4 cause AMD sux!" type comments.
Never have I seen so many great minds bent on such small a task.