faalin
Illustrious
androbourne :
Contiusa :
Legion501 :
By Intel well, the new Coffe Lake doesn't look like a good option either, if they are planning to make processor with more cores but working on low frequencies,
That's not what the lineup is showing. i7-8700K will run at 4.4Ghz with four cores in load -- same as i7-7700K, which only goes to 4.5Ghz in one (or two cores I am not sure), and 4.3Ghz with six cores in load. And you can always overclock.
I do not see any compromise in clock and performance. It might even come stronger than i7-7700K in single thread if Intel was skimping in IPC during the last generations.
They could mess up, but then this is on them. It has nothing to do with what they can do. Remember, Coffee Lake is not a Xeon part with disable cores.
Other than that, people tend to fear the worse always. They are pressured. I assume they will not screw this up.
Yes but the question is, is that stock speeds or OC speeds and what is its OC rated limits. If you is stock at lets say 4.4ghz can can't efficiently OC to at least 4.8ghz easily. Then whats the point. I can do that with a 6700k...
It really boils down to what the stock speeds are and how high it can OC.
This is just my first hand knowledge on an older 1366 build, but i had a i7 950 that i could ramp up to 4.9Ghz and ran it at 4.6Ghz 24/7. Needing more cores so i swapped it out for a i7 980x and could only reach 4.2Ghz no mater what i did, this could have been a luck of the draw with the chips or the fact that 6 cores cant clock as high as a 4 core.