Upgrade Graphics Card/PSU

Status
Not open for further replies.

migrantwing

Honorable
Aug 26, 2012
37
0
10,530
I would like to upgrade my graphics card and possibly my PSU (probably needed). I currently have a 250W PSU and an Nvidia GeForce 9200.

Can anyone help me with some much needed info on what to get as I would like to play games. I'm not in the market for a super gaming PC, but some of the games I want to play just won't run on my PC without being slow and glitchy. Also, price is a factor, the cheaper the better.

PC specs below. Any other specs required, please ask.

Many thanks!

System Model

Packard Bell imedia S3210

Operating System

Windows 7 Ultimate (x64) (build 7600)

Processor

2.70 gigahertz AMD Athlon II X3 425
128 kilobyte primary memory cache
512 kilobyte secondary memory cache
64-bit ready
Multi-core (3 total)
Not hyper-threaded

Memory Modules

2816 Megabytes Usable Installed Memory

Slot 'DIMM1' has 2048 MB
Slot 'DIMM2' has 1024 MB
 
Alan Wake, Rogue Warrior that type of thing. The graphics look great in the games, but the actual game seriously lags.

I don't mind playing games in medium or low settings.

The case is a smaller case.

 
It is quite a small case. I think it's classed as a 'midi' PC. Dimensions of the case are 12 inches high x 12 inches deep x 8 inches width.

I will take a pic and post it tomorrow, if that's OK?

Thank you very much for your help, Sunius!

See you tomorrow!

 
Yes it's okay. I wonder how the HDD bays look, because some cards can be too long. Also, you're lucky it's 8 inches width, you won't need a low profile card (which limits choice severely).

Lastly, that's not a midi PC. Mid cases are around 18 inches in height 😉. Looks like a mini case to me.
 
Not certain this will fit, it will work as long as you have a PCIe 2.0x16 video slot, no other power connection needed and should be fine with a 250watt power supply.

Research appears to indicate the motherboard is DATX (DTX?) which is a cheapened version of a mATX Motherboard.

I do not know if you need the "half height" PCI slot card or can use a full height one.
This is card for both:http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814161418
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150612
Single lot width full height
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814102969
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814161403

Anyway I wouldn't ask more of your case, power supply or cooling, no way I can tell if you can fit more than a single width card, Full height is better if it fits as larger fans tend to be quieter and cooler.
The "reference" design blows heat out the back which might be a consideration to help cooling.

So this is the " best card" I would use in this case. The HD 7770 is a better performer, but requirses a power supply 6 pin or 6+2 pin plug, nd is not available in reduced height if this is needed.

Alternatives would be the HD 6670 DDR3 which starts around $65. An HD 6670 DDR5 or HD 5670 DDR5 would be better but cost more if you can find either.

So determine the length, width, and thickness that will fit in your case. And choose accordingly.
 
so I googled your case and mobo and came up with a thread on steam
about your type of pc but the links to the pics are dead. also found some
pics of the back, insides and psu label in case (14A on 12v=168W, but old)

thread about gpu upgrade and psu req. (sorry, pic links dead)
http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/showthread.php?p=30113388

inside case, appears to have intake vents on the bottom
http://img638.imageshack.us/img638/1364/sansalimentationprofil.jpg
looks like a fat front panel cable in the way, unless u disconnect it
pretty bad design for connector placement, imho

back of case w/full height gpu installed
http://www.abcua.com/images/goods/733/7718_b.jpg

page w/ pics of pc back, insides, psu label
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/138/derrire.jpg/sr=1
hdd mounts on front wall, psu hangs over cpu hsf, optical normal spot

amd marketing slide for hd7750 and 7770 debut at hardocp (55w max tdp w/o modding)
http://hardocp.com/image.html?image=MTMyOTI1NzgzMzB5MFRsOUZSV2tfMV81X2wuZ2lm

looks like a gpu with a single slot cooler for you. best is a hd 7750 for sure.
the sapphire and HIS suggested by walterm have coolers that are too tall,
and the xfx can be found cheaper at amazon (see below). note, the amd
reference design is a short single slot with fairly small hsf combo. may not
seem like much, but with that low a tdp it gets the job done cooling the gpu.

listing on the egg of what looks like a reference design hd7750 single slot
only 6.61 inches long and fairly cheap 109.99-10.00 rebate + 6.98 shipping
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814131461

xfx radeon hd 7750 single slot 112.49 and free shipping
http://www.amazon.com/XFX-Single-Display-Graphics-FX775AZNP4/dp/B007Z3T5JC/
ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1346036856&sr=8-4&keywords=hd+7750

same power color as above @ncix but cheaper 109.99-10.00 rebate, FREE SHIPPING!
http://us.ncix.com/products/?sku=70112&vpn=AX7750%201GBD5-DH&manufacture=PowerColo

so, last one comes in at a penny under a Ben Franklin after rebate, but don't know
how power color is at honoring rebates. still, 12.50 cheaper than xfx. xfx may have
better warranty and the cooler does look more substantial(longer pcb, too). I wouldn't
worry about fit, def. not for shorter powercolor and prob. not for xfx. That thread did
mention a concern about power consumption even on cards with lower tdp and the
power supply being old so not performing as well as new(more like 12A on 12v or 144w
total). your cpu is athlon II x3 425 w/95w tdp and c2 stepping, unless... you fire up
cpuz/cpuid(free download) and determine it is a 425e, w/45w tdp and c3 stepping.

at any rate, the cpu probably wouldn't even hit the max tdp if you prime95 torture
tested it, and the hd7750 likely wouldn't even hit its max tdp of 55 watt while running
a program like furmark, so even the most demanding game out now or in the near
future should'nt push your psu beyond a point it cant handle. I hope this helps u out.
 
also ,after looking at pics of your mobo on google and the longer expansion slot
(not the short pcie 1x slot), it is definitely a pcie x16 slot, and given timeline of your
processor's life cycle it has to be a pcie 2.0 slot. it should provide up to 75w straight
from the slot( no extra pcie 6pin power connector needed for a reference clocked
800 mhz hd 7750, though there are 900mhz models out there that need that extra
75w from the 6pin(cant imagine why, lest one overclocks the card heavily). from
pictures, the powercolor appears to definitely NOT require more power than the slot
can provide, but it is hard to tell if the same is true for the xfx based on the pics i
could find. i didn't look real hard, though.
 
i need to learn how to edit my posts sometime.

according to the egg, both the power color and the xfx have 2yrs parts and labor.

it seems to me that the cooler on the xfx stifles the air blown from the fan over the
gpu from escaping the heatsink shroud, but the power color does not appear to have
this problem(fair amount of clearance by display outputs). people seem to regard
xfx more highly than they do powercolor. not sure if it truly makes a difference. if you
don't include the rebate for the power color, then the xfx costs only 2.50 more.

after reading user reviews for both cards on the egg, amazon, and ncix, i found that

the xfx is identical to the power color in regard to pcie 6pin power connectors(none).

they will definitely run on a 250w psu(with a 65w core i5 3450s).if your x3 425 is the
45w c3 stepping e version, you're in the clear. if it's the normal 95w c2 stepping, see
if your mobo allows you to drop your voltage, then try torture testing your cpu at the
default clock speeds but lower voltage w/prime 95(free download) to see if you get
errors. if not, you can save some power burden on your psu from the cpu. you may
also be able to undervolt the 7750 and get stable performance. test with furmark.

they're about 50% faster than 5670(i can totally see that, even over a 6670 as well).

faster than hd 4850(20-25% faster in most games, prob. due to GCN architecture).

many professional reviews around the web show these cards perform about the same
as the likes of 3870x2/9800gtx(+),hd4850/gts250, 5750/gts450 and 6750 in some
games, while in others they perform just under the likes of hd4870/gtx260, 5770 and
6770. again I would expect them to perform near the lower spec cards, but the gcn
architecture seems to raise performance a notch, esp. in dx11 titles. of course newer
drivers designed to further exploit the new architecture help boost performance too.

fairly quiet when running in a closed case.

decent temps( 70c vs. custom cooled 5670 @55c, much lower than gtx480 @95c).

half life 2 smooth at 3x1920x1200 on high with 2xaa and 4xaf(handles even more
pixels than that due to bezel correction).

i suggest you read these user reviews, too(not many, won't take you very long).
(just added more lower cost/power/perf. cards to list at bottom)

some had issues with drivers on the power color, but probably because it has a
reference design and came out at launch while xfx may be newer. newer drivers
direct from amd should solve any issues. maybe download 12.6, 12.7 and 12.8
and see which works best for you in the games you play. of course you'll need
to remove the old geforce drivers before installing radeon drivers, and if you
switch between driver versions you need to remove and add as well. do some
google-ing for best practices for undervolt testing and driver swaps. peace out, yo.
(see top of this paragraph, didn't mean anything wrong with reference pcb/cooler
on the power color, just that the drivers shipping with/available for the hd7750 when
it launched were not yet optimized. newer ones in the months since are lots better.)

P.S. after googling the xfx single slot looking for visual evidence of the need for more
power, came up empty handed. I reread a few user reviews and discovered it doesn't
need any more juice than the slot provides. added that info in above list. also, if you
have never upgraded a graphics card before, you will definitely want to remove every
trace of an old driver before installing a newer one, whether it's from the same gpu
maker on not. i've personally not had to do this much, but others have with variable
success. google about updating graphics drivers(nvidia to amd, amd to amd) if you
have any concerns about that sort of thing.

one last thing about gpu power requirements, PSUs and typical system load. GPU
makers list suggested psu wattages and # of amps on the 12v rail that are stupid
high given the average consumer desktop to help mitigate their liability. most people
only run the mobo, cpu, 2 dimms of ram, an hdd, a few fans, some low power usb
peripherals and maybe one discrete gpu. the requirements listed for graphics cards
take in to account a ton of extra fans, hard drives, expansion cards and several more
power hungry usb devices that dont have power of their own. even then, when a
system is running full bore it never uses anywhere near the maximum theoretical
wattage of all the components combined. that said, not all power supplies are created
equal. the better ones on the market use often heavier, high quality components inside
and can deliver even more than their rated total wattage with greater than 80%
efficiency, while others are light weight sub par builds that cant even deliver 1/2-2/3 of
the rated wattage at much better than 50% efficiency w/o catching fire. i think many
oem type power supplies may be alright and you see more fireworks with literally over-
rated supplies available for sale separately. again, if you have stability issues with the
new card or even want to try and save some power now with your cpu, you might want
to attempt undervolting them both a bit and still get the same level of performance.

P.S.S. thanks dudewitbow! now i have learnt how to edit my own posts! of course, in-
stead of more shorter posts, this may lead to fewer but longer posts. oh boy....
i should really try to condense my thoughts and reduce any redundancy.

anyhoo.. a few more thoughts, then finish very late supper and hit the hay(i think/hope).
i hope i can remember everything so i don't have to do this again in like 2 seconds.

to the original poster..... what is your monitor's resolution? (if you're not sure, right
click an open spot on your desktop, click properties, then settings). if this level of
detail or whatnot is offensive to you, please know it is not intentional. some people ask
questions on these forums that have built many PCs, and some know next to
nothing about them.

also, do you live in the united states? California? don't know about amazon or ncix,
but i hear tell purchases shipped to California from the egg add tax to the total since
that is where they are located. Am i wrong?

perhaps you don't plan on spending 100 dollars or more on a new gpu.
when walterm suggested the hd5670/6670 as alternatives, he was certainly right that
they are less expensive than hd7750. , however, they do have even higher power
consumption at about 65w vs. 55 for the hd 7750. here is an xfx model at the egg that
is 64.99 after a 10.00 rebate. has gddr3 so bandwidth is less than half a gddr5 model.
www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150576

guessing if you are upgrading you want at least a direct x 11 gpu. a quick peek at the
egg shows all dx11 geforce cards at least around 100 and drawing far more power for
similar performance to hd7750. all older dx11 GPUs are built on a 40nm process but the
latest hd7000 series radeons and gtx600 series geforce cards are built using 28nm,
allowing more transistors(shaders mostly. one of the main aspects of a cards
performance is based on # of shaders times clock speed in mhz/ghz.), lower voltage/
power use, higher clockspeed and built on a similar sized or smaller piece of silicon so
can be sold for same/more(same size but w/more performance) or less(smaller size,
same performance). this limits us to radeons (at least at the egg) below 100 and
hd5670/6670 use more power than 7750 @65 but have lower performance. we can
stay there if you think your PSU can handle it or go lower price/perf./power. anything
below an hd6450 is probably not going to seem like much of an upgrade for you. 27w.

actually, the lower end market for nvidia cards is a bit of a mess. if you or someone
else here want to sort it out, by all means go for it . I will be sticking to suggesting
amd cards as i am more familiar with their specs and performance.

compare geforce cards to each other here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Nvidia_graphics_processing_units

compare radeons to each other here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_AMD_graphics_processing_units

hd6450 27w
HIS 34.99 free shipping
http://www.amazon.com/HIS-Radeon-64bit-Video-H645H1G/dp/B004YE8G6I/ref=sr_1_5?s=pc&ie=UTF8&qid=1346059100&sr=1-5&keywords=hd+6450

hd5550 39w
vision tek 1GB 55.65 free shipping
http://www.amazon.com/VisionTek-Radeon-Express-Graphics-900331/dp/B004DCA8W6/ref=sr_1_6?s=pc&ie=UTF8&qid=1346059935&sr=1-6&keywords=hd+6570

hd6570s, 44w
msi 54.99 - 10.00 rebate + 6.98 shipping
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127611

asus 61.98 - 10.00 rebate free shipping
http://us.ncix.com/products/?sku=64362&vpn=EAH6570%2FDI%2F1GD3%28LP%29&manufacture=ASUS

msi 54.98 free shipping
http://us.ncix.com/products/?sku=70039&vpn=R6570-MD1G%2FLP&manufacture=MSI%2FMicroStar

 


Hey, Sunius!

Do the pics that jtenorj suffice? It seems that the information that has been given is a lot.

A lot has happened since I logged off. LOL!


 


Thank you for the information, walterm!
 
In reference to the processor, jtenorj...

30bzp5e.png


Also, the resolution of my screen is 1920 x 1080 @60Hz. It is a 40" Samsung flatscreen TV via HDMI cable.

I live in the the UK.

 
Thank you for all your help, Sunius.

I don't know if I'll need a new PSU (as jtenorj mentons), but for that price, including the HD6670 2GB, it's worth doing, as long as my mobo accepts it. I'm new to all this PC customising :)

Thank you, once again.

I was going to save up for a new custom PC, but a few pence short of £95 to keep this PC going, it's cheaper than £800-1200 for a new build :)

Thanks to all who have helped!

 
Excuse my lack of knowledge, but what is the difference between the HD6670 DDR3, DDR5 and the HD6770 1GB DDR5, apart from price? It's all so confusing :)

Talk to me about road bikes or guitars and music, fine, but I'm outta my depth here :)



 


Ah, I understand. I have learnt quite a few things these last few days :)

I think I'm just going to go with your suggestion. It makes sense and saves the endless fors and againsts that you get on forums :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.