Paul please try and keep it simple and to the point. I don't have time to read a novel on your theories. Writing 5 billion words won't make you any more right.
He uses his computer mainly for gamming not everyone can afford to upgrade every 6 months. Out dated as his computer is he's a gamer and wants to upgrade to a new much better gamming machine. That’s hardcore enough in my book.
Re: And tell me what is wrong with a 2.8C now even for gaming?
Nothing but in my opinion a64 is a better choice on the current motherboards for his situation. You are the one eliminating an entire cpu generation not me. If he said he was a casual gamer and did lots of compression video encoding I would not be arguing with you with that one chip.
Re: NF3-150 was and is a big letdown. You might disagree because the performance is so close even with 600 hypertransport. But the shortfalls are hard for enthusiasts to forget.
You got a gamming benchmark to back that up? The short fall is virtually unnoticeable. It's just in your head. Did not p4-man just finish explaining this to you? If it bugs you so much go via. Or do you have n excuse for (the current) a64 via chipsets as well?
Look at it this way Paul, you are the one eliminating a reasonable choice (over and over) not me, his needs and wants are very specific (gaming) the internet surfing part is irrelevant. Since this is the case I believe he is better off with an a64 setup over a p4-2.8c setup. Period.
The fact that the guy does not upgrade every 6 months is all the more reason to not worry about the 2% increase he might get by waiting for the nforce3-250.
If I glanced at a spilt box of tooth picks on the floor, could I tell you how many are in the pile. Not a chance, But then again I don't have to buy my underware at Kmart.
He uses his computer mainly for gamming not everyone can afford to upgrade every 6 months. Out dated as his computer is he's a gamer and wants to upgrade to a new much better gamming machine. That’s hardcore enough in my book.
Re: And tell me what is wrong with a 2.8C now even for gaming?
Nothing but in my opinion a64 is a better choice on the current motherboards for his situation. You are the one eliminating an entire cpu generation not me. If he said he was a casual gamer and did lots of compression video encoding I would not be arguing with you with that one chip.
Re: NF3-150 was and is a big letdown. You might disagree because the performance is so close even with 600 hypertransport. But the shortfalls are hard for enthusiasts to forget.
You got a gamming benchmark to back that up? The short fall is virtually unnoticeable. It's just in your head. Did not p4-man just finish explaining this to you? If it bugs you so much go via. Or do you have n excuse for (the current) a64 via chipsets as well?
Look at it this way Paul, you are the one eliminating a reasonable choice (over and over) not me, his needs and wants are very specific (gaming) the internet surfing part is irrelevant. Since this is the case I believe he is better off with an a64 setup over a p4-2.8c setup. Period.
The fact that the guy does not upgrade every 6 months is all the more reason to not worry about the 2% increase he might get by waiting for the nforce3-250.
If I glanced at a spilt box of tooth picks on the floor, could I tell you how many are in the pile. Not a chance, But then again I don't have to buy my underware at Kmart.