USB 3.1 Spec Approved, Brings 10Gbps Speeds

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

IndignantSkeptic

Distinguished
Apr 19, 2011
507
0
18,980
stevejnb, if our technology does not advance at a sufficiently fast rate to compensate for other changes such as human population increase and the decrease of some resources then the result will be recession, followed by depression, followed by apocalypse. What the hell is wrong with you? Go live in Talibanistan.
 

JPNpower

Honorable
Jun 7, 2013
1,072
0
11,360


Ever consider that population increase was unsustainable?
 

freedom4556

Distinguished
May 7, 2010
25
0
18,530


Why don't you just have two computers/devices? Use a sync software like SyncToy or cloud storage like Skydrive, and you can have your cake and eat it too, without all the compromises of trying to create a gaming rig out of an ultrabook or carrying a Clevo around like it's an iPad. You don't have to choose one or the other. You can have both you know.
 

IT_Architect

Distinguished
Dec 29, 2011
7
1
18,510
USB 3.0 has a signaling speed of 5 gbps, 4 gbps total throughput, and ~3.2 gbps of usable. So hopefully with 3.1 we are talking about 6.4 gbps of usable throughput. Thunderbolt sounds far superior technologically, but the USB backwards compatibility has a usability advantage. Also keep in mind that USB up to 2.0 and SATA/eSATA are half-duplex, while USB 3.x, Thunderbolt, and SAS, are full-duplex.

Concerning what fast enough is, USB 2.0, with a signalling rate of 480 mbps, half-duplex, with a throughput of ~280 mbps, can't stay ahead of even the sorriest SATA hard drive. A Gig-E NAS can beat that. Gig-E cannot keep up with even a single 5900 RPM hard drive. USB 3.0 with a usable throughput of ~3.2 gbps can easily stay ahead of any single external SATA mechanical drive, but even two external 7200 RPM SATA drives can max USB 3.0. USB 3.1 with an anticipated throughput of ~6.4 gbps would remove the connection bottleneck for external SATA drives entirely. SSDs cannot produce more usable throughput than the capabilities of the 4.8 gbps half-duplex throughput of the SATA III bus they sit on.

Thus, we can say that if you have a multiple drive external storage array, such as a RAID-0, RAID-10, or RAID-5; USB 3.1 solves a performance issue that you are already experiencing. Currently, the only shipping solution is Thunderbolt.
 


There are laptops with quite good GPUs that are thin, light weight and have good battery life. They are a bit pricey compared to the bulky ones. However, once you pay the obscene price for a Thunderbolt dock then add a GPU you've made up the difference.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.