USB 3.0 has a signaling speed of 5 gbps, 4 gbps total throughput, and ~3.2 gbps of usable. So hopefully with 3.1 we are talking about 6.4 gbps of usable throughput. Thunderbolt sounds far superior technologically, but the USB backwards compatibility has a usability advantage. Also keep in mind that USB up to 2.0 and SATA/eSATA are half-duplex, while USB 3.x, Thunderbolt, and SAS, are full-duplex.
Concerning what fast enough is, USB 2.0, with a signalling rate of 480 mbps, half-duplex, with a throughput of ~280 mbps, can't stay ahead of even the sorriest SATA hard drive. A Gig-E NAS can beat that. Gig-E cannot keep up with even a single 5900 RPM hard drive. USB 3.0 with a usable throughput of ~3.2 gbps can easily stay ahead of any single external SATA mechanical drive, but even two external 7200 RPM SATA drives can max USB 3.0. USB 3.1 with an anticipated throughput of ~6.4 gbps would remove the connection bottleneck for external SATA drives entirely. SSDs cannot produce more usable throughput than the capabilities of the 4.8 gbps half-duplex throughput of the SATA III bus they sit on.
Thus, we can say that if you have a multiple drive external storage array, such as a RAID-0, RAID-10, or RAID-5; USB 3.1 solves a performance issue that you are already experiencing. Currently, the only shipping solution is Thunderbolt.