Vest

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

Matt Silberstein <RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
: On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 04:07:53 +0000 (UTC), in rec.photo.digital , Randy
: Berbaum <rberbaum@bluestem.prairienet.org> in
: <d4f62p$j5k$4@wildfire.prairienet.org> wrote:

: >
: >www2.rangersurplus.com/details.asp?item_id=1705
: >
: >The bottom pockets for lenses are big enough, but not well padded, so a
: >padded lens case or pouch should be used in addition to the vest. But for
: >carrying tons of "stuff" this vest cant be beat for anywhere near this
: >price.

: Looks nice. Buying equipment is fun, even if it is just a vest. And
: since I can't afford to go buy a new camera I am going to milk this
: for all it is worth. My spouse cringes with the thought, but I am the
: one who will look like a geek.

When I first purchased my vest, I wasn't getting it as a Photog vest but
as a theme park touring vest. I don't like carrying a backpack with my
camera, rain poncho, and all the other stuff (bad back had something to do
with this dislike). And a belt pouch (fanny pack) is either small enough
to be mostly useless, or so huge that it makes it hard to get in and out
of rides. But I can wear this vest with more than I ever carried in either
the pack or pouch and still be comfortable and flexable enough to get in
and out of rides. But now that I am concentrating on DSLR photography here
at home, I realized that I can also use this vest here at home as a
wearable camera bag (Of course the item name of "photojournalist's vest"
might have had some effect on this realization). :)

One nice thing about a vest with the equipment spread around and held
close to the body, strain on back and sholders is greatly reduced (or
eliminated).

Randy

==========
Randy Berbaum
Champaign, IL
 
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

In article <arjc61h5dlbgq5i85efenh1jop0pgnfsru@4ax.com>,
Matt Silberstein <RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

> I am going to get a photographer's vest. Not because I truly need one,
> but because I am a geek. Being a geek I have to get a complex one that
> does the job. So what should I specifically look for, or is lots of
> pockets and Velcro and loops good enough?

Make sure you get one with a brand name on it - you'll have to pay more
for it but it'll be worth it.
 
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:25:49 +0900, in rec.photo.digital , Stewy
<anyone4tennis@hotmail.com> in
<anyone4tennis-DD8698.19254927042005@newssv.kcn.ne.jp> wrote:

>In article <arjc61h5dlbgq5i85efenh1jop0pgnfsru@4ax.com>,
> Matt Silberstein <RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>> I am going to get a photographer's vest. Not because I truly need one,
>> but because I am a geek. Being a geek I have to get a complex one that
>> does the job. So what should I specifically look for, or is lots of
>> pockets and Velcro and loops good enough?
>
>Make sure you get one with a brand name on it - you'll have to pay more
>for it but it'll be worth it.

ROTFLMAO. You mean it is not enough to advertise on my shirt and
pants?

Ok, so here is a survey: would you pay more or less for your camera if
the company name was removed? Would it matter what company made it?


--
Matt Silberstein

All in all, if I could be any animal, I would want to be
a duck or a goose. They can fly, walk, and swim. Plus,
there there is a certain satisfaction knowing that at the
end of your life you will taste good with an orange sauce
or, in the case of a goose, a chestnut stuffing.
 
Archived from groups: rec.photo.digital (More info?)

On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 13:12:31 GMT, Matt Silberstein
<RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:25:49 +0900, in rec.photo.digital , Stewy
><anyone4tennis@hotmail.com> in
><anyone4tennis-DD8698.19254927042005@newssv.kcn.ne.jp> wrote:
>
>>In article <arjc61h5dlbgq5i85efenh1jop0pgnfsru@4ax.com>,
>> Matt Silberstein <RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I am going to get a photographer's vest. Not because I truly need one,
>>> but because I am a geek. Being a geek I have to get a complex one that
>>> does the job. So what should I specifically look for, or is lots of
>>> pockets and Velcro and loops good enough?
>>
>>Make sure you get one with a brand name on it - you'll have to pay more
>>for it but it'll be worth it.
>
>ROTFLMAO. You mean it is not enough to advertise on my shirt and
>pants?
>
>Ok, so here is a survey: would you pay more or less for your camera if
>the company name was removed? Would it matter what company made it?

You might find your old film SLR in a closet one day, blow the dust
off and not remember what make it is.

<G>

Nikon realizes this and put BRIGHT F'IN YELLOW letters all over the
straps. They also stamp their name on the image too (EXIF).

--
Owamanga!
http://www.pbase.com/owamanga
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

TRENDING THREADS