Watch Blu-ray And Burn DVDs: Three Low-Cost Solutions

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Crashman

Polypheme
Former Staff
[citation][nom]B-Unit[/nom]Damn, wish I had known Lite-On and Plextor got their drives from the same place. Been avoiding Lite-On like the plague because they sounded like a fly-by-night generic.[/citation]

Lite-On is a manufacturer, one of the industry's largest.
 

Crashman

Polypheme
Former Staff
[citation][nom]ram1009[/nom]This author must be pretty young as he has no idea what the first burners aimed at the masses cost. My first HP burner was nearly $400 and I waited some time until it dropped to that level. Also, it was nearly useless as it constantly produced "buffer underrun" errors.[/citation]

It was an HP burner. OEM brands were a lot cheaper...I don't think "the author" even bothered looking until the 4x models came out though.
 

inmytaxi

Distinguished
Dec 9, 2008
73
0
18,630
Seeing as these are close in price to BluRay writer's during some sales, why not review the $60 LiteOn ihos 104 instead of the 208?
 

A_Real_Overclocker

Distinguished
Sep 13, 2008
61
0
18,640
Unless I am amiss on my calculations at $2=25Gb a pop blueray is finally in the same price range per Gb as Hard drives. I am very interested now in the lifespan of BD discs and the burn quality current drives give. As pointed out earlier the early DVD drives and discs were crap. If reliability is up to par I might soon switch myself. I have not been watching BD prices I did not realize that prices had finally started dropping to more sane levels.
 

liquidsnake718

Distinguished
Jul 8, 2009
1,379
0
19,310
These are probably better for mediacenters rather than PCs as PCs are so bulky. I think getting a PS3 ould be the best bet if you really want to watch BD movies and not worry about having to burn discs.
 

tmc

Distinguished
Aug 22, 2007
99
0
18,630
Consumers are not served well by the optical disc industry anymore. The QC of blank media & the prices are beginning to be non-comptetive with hard drives. First think of the price per gb with a hard drive vs the price per gb of blank media. Next, think of how long each medium would last (if you stored your data on it & stuck it on a shelf for 5 years/hardly used it). Now you begin to see a picture of why optical media is not as cost effective anymore and much more of a liability for data integrity these days. So, the optical media industry needs to get it's act together.
 

niknikktm

Distinguished
Jan 29, 2009
39
0
18,530
Optical discs take up much less shelf space than a HDD would.

Say what? Put it on a shelf? An optical disc will outlast a hundred HDD's, and who puts a HDD on a shelf? HDD's fail. Moving parts wear out. It's a fact. If you take care of an optical disc it will last a lifetime.

I've had no problems with QC of the media I buy. Just don't buy the bargain basement brands. I use Ritek and maybe have one defective disc in a 50 disc spindle.

I've been burning DVD's for over a decade. Never had one of my discs go bad yet. Wanna know how many hard drives I've gone through???
 

Crashman

Polypheme
Former Staff
[citation][nom]niknikktm[/nom]I've been burning DVD's for over a decade. Never had one of my discs go bad yet. Wanna know how many hard drives I've gone through???[/citation]

Lucky you!
 

tmc

Distinguished
Aug 22, 2007
99
0
18,630
[citation][nom]niknikktm[/nom]Optical discs take up much less shelf space than a HDD would.Say what? Put it on a shelf? An optical disc will outlast a hundred HDD's, and who puts a HDD on a shelf? HDD's fail. Moving parts wear out. It's a fact. If you take care of an optical disc it will last a lifetime.I've had no problems with QC of the media I buy. Just don't buy the bargain basement brands. I use Ritek and maybe have one defective disc in a 50 disc spindle.I've been burning DVD's for over a decade. Never had one of my discs go bad yet. Wanna know how many hard drives I've gone through???[/citation]

The thing is you probably don't write that many dvds. If you've written enough dvds since the've become affordable to buy (around 2003) you will find that many which have been written in the past 6 years could have read errors (particularly on COMPRESSED DATA BACKUPS). Way back when we had slower burners & higher quality substrate things were good and the lifespan was advertised as "lifetime", but in recent years-- there have been projected "aging" lab tests which show that an ordinary DVD-R/+R disc can have corrupt data (un-recoverable) in as little as 2 years. Now, compare that with a hard drive that sits on a shelf for 5 years and you see where what I'm getting at-- provided you don't have high humidity or large temperature changes.. chances are that drive will be able to work nearly as factory fresh. There are practical reasons to understand about the longevity of data storage devices & media.. because alot of these media backups//digital conversion have lost PRICELESS conversions of film & historical documentation. To say that off the shelf optical discs are archive quality (aside from Taiyo Yuden) is a critial mistake. Manufactured Media (printed dvd discs) used to have a longer lifespan due to high quality substrate, but that's almost no longer the case anymore-- but since the industry is converting over to blue ray, the focus is on high quality blue ray substrate.
 

A_Real_Overclocker

Distinguished
Sep 13, 2008
61
0
18,640


Agreed I write a large amount of dvd's now, and after a near disaster with some cheap media a couple years ago I now pi-po scan every disc I burn if it has any significant storage data on it. With a lesson involving a spindle of 50 discs DO NOT TRUST YOUR burning software's disc check feature. I burned every disc with the check disc enable in nero , and still had about 35 of the discs unreadable with errors after a few months later. Now I check all burns as I said with a PI-PO scan, and if my quality falls below 95% I will not use that media anymore. I now back up all my truly important data such as family albums, dvd's, and documents on my main system drive with a backup on a separate raid 1 array. To say the least dvd reliability is very lacking still.
 

Crashman

Polypheme
Former Staff



I store my archives in two places: On a RAID array and on a disconnected backup drive. Whenever I upgrade, I add the archives to my new array and use the old drives as disconnected backups. I don't place much faith in optical media for long-term storage.
 

wira020

Distinguished
Apr 9, 2009
63
0
18,630
Would really appreciate if you could also compare them in term of noise.. at least comparatively which is loudest etc... i own LiteOn 24x dvd burner/reader and the speed at read alone is unbearable... especially while starting read... i seriously cant understand why would manufacturer ignore noise production of ODD when it's meant as media player... whats the point in using silent fans, soundproof internal and quiet hdd when the ODD is as noisy as hell...
 

Crashman

Polypheme
Former Staff
[citation][nom]wira020[/nom]Would really appreciate if you could also compare them in term of noise.. at least comparatively which is loudest etc... i own LiteOn 24x dvd burner/reader and the speed at read alone is unbearable... especially while starting read... i seriously cant understand why would manufacturer ignore noise production of ODD when it's meant as media player... whats the point in using silent fans, soundproof internal and quiet hdd when the ODD is as noisy as hell...[/citation]

All of them are moderately noisey at max read/max write, and all of them are very quiet at normal read (media playback). To make it comparative noisier drives would have to be added to the comparison...max noise for all three is around half of the "worst" drive I've heard, but you won't notice the noise during media playback.
 
G

Guest

Guest
I bought LG's UH08LS10 and am disappointed. Blu-ray playback is horrible. It briefly pauses every couple of seconds which makes for a unacceptable movie viewing experience. Even more frustrating than that is if you got LG’s support website and search for model number UH08LS10, you get no results – as if they don’t even sell the device. What a waste of money!
 
I bought LG's UH08LS10 and am disappointed. Blu-ray playback is horrible. It briefly pauses every couple of seconds which makes for a unacceptable movie viewing experience. Even more frustrating than that is if you got LG’s support website and search for model number UH08LS10, you get no results – as if they don’t even sell the device. What a waste of money!
I think your drive is defective, or you have a software issue. Can you not just exchange the drive where you got it?
I have the non bluray burning LG BD drive and it works very well, no skips ever so far.
 

Crashman

Polypheme
Former Staff
[citation][nom]wtkidd1972[/nom]I bought LG's UH08LS10 and am disappointed. Blu-ray playback is horrible. It briefly pauses every couple of seconds which makes for a unacceptable movie viewing experience. Even more frustrating than that is if you got LG’s support website and search for model number UH08LS10, you get no results – as if they don’t even sell the device. What a waste of money![/citation]

That's probably either a software issue or a lack of supporting hardware to decode the movies fast enough. Basically if you use CPU decoding you need a powerful CPU, and to use GPU decoding you need a "decent" graphics card and the right software settings.

Also, you're not looking for the "right" drive according to the way LG sets up their site. THEY want you to look for "UH08" and forget the "LS10" part. Yes, the site is too lame to cross-reference UH08LS10 to the UH08 page.
 

pocketdrummer

Distinguished
Dec 1, 2007
1,084
30
19,310
Keep in mind, the LG is also $60 cheaper than the LG. How much is the extra performance worth? Besides, $40 more than the plextor, and you could just buy a Blu-ray burner.
 
G

Guest

Guest
The bundled software by Cyberlink sucks. They're only interested in getting you to upgrade to a higher version. Why would I pay $100 for an upgrade to software that I'm not sure will work because there bundled software sure doesn't.
 

Crashman

Polypheme
Former Staff
[citation][nom]youyoutoto[/nom]why bother with a blu ray reader /dvd burner combo ??? they now have blue ray burners if i really need a dvd burner i'll jsut get a blue ray burner/reader , and a seperate dvd burner/reader[/citation]And you drug up a review from LAST DECADE just to let us know it was outdated? I smell spam, specifically a hidden link, and I've reported it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.