We want more erattas

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

A reasonable ammount, of course.
As the game grows and new options are explored [i don't need to list
them all], the interactions between old cards/effects and new
cards/effects can have some unexpected results.
Errata'ing cards helps the game grow.

Besides, it's better than just banninating them, right?

-KB, Prince of Harrisburg

[what I wouldn't mind is seeing new printings of errata'ed cards,
however]

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

<id777fei@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1108748763.267581.134330@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>A reasonable ammount, of course.
> As the game grows and new options are explored [i don't need to list
> them all], the interactions between old cards/effects and new
> cards/effects can have some unexpected results.
> Errata'ing cards helps the game grow.
>
> Besides, it's better than just banninating them, right?

Um, what brought this on?


Fred, who feels he needs more cod liver oil in his life too

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

i just thought it would have a funny point-counterpoint [the onion]
feel to it
as in, Johannes Walch's posting titled "we don't want more erratas"

ah, nevermind, at least i was amused
-KB, Prince of Harrisburg

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

<id777fei@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1108753498.384035.108390@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> i just thought it would have a funny point-counterpoint [the onion]
> feel to it as in, Johannes Walch's posting titled "we don't want
> more erratas"

Yea, I figured that out a couple seconds later. Just the way my
newsreader was set, I hit the threads in the wrong order. It
was a very strange request to see out of context.

Fred