web site maps for CA fixed

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

Santa Barbara & San Luis Obispo, CA now have their own coverage maps
instead of mistakenly being linked to the Los Angeles maps. Thanks to
Frank Harris for notifing sprint about this problem.
 
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

They may show Santa Barabra, but the maps are still way too small scale and
brush over **known** deadspots.

SprintPCS and other carriers still ignore their own indistries "Consumer Code",
and invite dissatisfied customers by having maps drawn by their marketing
departments thatomit holes in ocverage.
 
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

In article <20040518071136.10326.00001737@mb-m03.aol.com>, nebby00007
@aol.com says...
>
> SprintPCS and other carriers still ignore their own indistries "Consumer Code",
> and invite dissatisfied customers by having maps drawn by their marketing
> departments thatomit holes in ocverage.
>
>

Such a map as you expect is physically impossible, Phill. But you've
been told before, and you simply cease to discuss it.

--
RØß
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them
 
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

> Such a map as you expect is physically impossible,

Thats new lame excuse.

The current maps are basicly lies. They are too small a scall to use, and they
paint over known dead zones. Both of which **ARE** physically possible to
include on a map.

But that might be customer friendly.
 
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

In article <20040519082106.22589.00000799@mb-m29.aol.com>, nebby00007
@aol.com says...
> The current maps are basicly lies. They are too small a scall to use, and they
> paint over known dead zones. Both of which **ARE** physically possible to
> include on a map.
>

Not at the level you expect, Phill. You expect block-level detail.
And that's not physically possible. Coverage at that small a scale
can change, and pretty radically, within 24 hours. For something
like that, we have to rely on customer reports.

--
RØß
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them
 
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

> You expect block-level detail.

Thank you for proving yoiu are the LIAr in trying to apologize for Sprint PCS
and its unacceptable maps.

You find me a post where I asked for block level detail. And when you can't
I'll expect an apology, otherwise, I complain to KC.

All I ask is that known dead zones. Like Little Elm Texas be represented.
 
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Phillip <Phillip@gte.net> wrote:
>
> You find me a post where I asked for block level detail. And when you can't
> I'll expect an apology, otherwise, I complain to KC.
>

Who are YOU to demain an APOLOGY Phillip? You lied about me and
misquoted a posting where you attributed all the foul language to me and
not a single word of it was mine ... and you NEVER APOLOGIZED. That
indeed makes you a hypocrite on a very grand scale indeed!

- --

Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAq7cn1p0e3NXsrtERAuO+AKCq9mhiDveRIZ3Thi99ktDja7TKMgCfUc1Z
gG90S1T58Zv9F0WXXzNHQiY=
=OVwj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

In article <20040519135537.05832.00001474@mb-m03.aol.com>, nebby00007
@aol.com says...
> You find me a post where I asked for block level detail.
>

Time and again, Phill, you've responded to people with specific
address complaints that the maps are inadequate. What inference
should one draw from that if *not* a demand for block-level detail?

--
RØß
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them
 
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

"Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy71@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:40abb728$0$166$892e0abb@auth.newsreader.octanews.com...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Phillip <Phillip@gte.net> wrote:
> >
> > You find me a post where I asked for block level detail. And when you
can't
> > I'll expect an apology, otherwise, I complain to KC.
> >
>
> Who are YOU to demain an APOLOGY Phillip? You lied about me and
> misquoted a posting where you attributed all the foul language to me and
> not a single word of it was mine ... and you NEVER APOLOGIZED. That
> indeed makes you a hypocrite on a very grand scale indeed!

My sentiments as well ... He's done all that ... and more to yours truly ...

Bob
 
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

> Who are YOU to demain an APOLOGY

When the apologists continue to spread the lie that SprintPCS coverage maps are
acceptable.

They are too small scale (i.e. 1" = 50 miles) and
paint over known dead zones.
 
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

> Time and again, you've responded to people with
> specific address complaints that the maps are
> inadequate. What inference should one draw from > that if *not* a demand for
block-level detail?

Someone asking for known deadzones in Houston or
New York City is a little different some saying maps paint over known deadzones
and are inadequate.
AGAIN you find a post where I said maps should be at block level detail...
You can't...
So you invent a phoney conclusion.

Rob J vargas. The disgrace of SPrint PCS



I have some extra email to write today.
 
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Phillip <Phillip@gte.net> wrote:
>> Who are YOU to demain an APOLOGY
>
> When the apologists continue to spread the lie that SprintPCS coverage maps are
> acceptable.
>
> They are too small scale (i.e. 1" = 50 miles) and
> paint over known dead zones.

So, you can't apologize for something you did and you expect somebody
else to apologize for something that they didn't do? Good one pea
brain.

- --

Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFArMEZ1p0e3NXsrtERAh6KAKClUM5O/ndP+uIG6XceLsMG9HwWYwCeNk64
siPj3W6Ia/Tmo1zT7kdx2VI=
=GVpv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

In article <20040520073133.27424.00000991@mb-m24.aol.com>, nebby00007
@aol.compants says...
> When the apologists continue to spread the lie that SprintPCS coverage maps are
> acceptable.
>

Which is *not* what is being said, Phill.

--
RØß
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom