G
Guest
Guest
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general (More info?)
Or, more precisely, what leads XP to decide what is removable and what
isn't? Example: System 1 is a P4 built in a Shuttle SFF case with the
provided MB; 1 SATA hard disk with three partitions, 1 DVD-ROM on PATA,
1 floppy on floppy channel, 1 multi-format flash reader on USB; the
system sees two of the flash slots as removable storage. System 2 is an
Athlon 64 built on an Epox Nvidia+ MB. 1 SATA hard disk (with two
partitions), 1 SATA DVD-ROM (using a bridge adapter), 4 hard disks on
PATA, 1 floppy on floppy channel, 1 multi-format flash reader on USB;
the system sees _both_ SATA drives as being removable along with two of
the flash slots. Either system properly sees an external hard disk on
USB or Firewire as being removable.
What leads the OS to think that SATA is removable on the second system
and not the first? Does the BIOS pass this information along or is it
something else? On the second system the C: drive is one of the SATA
partitions and the computer boots fine from it. It isn't as though I'm
going to start removing the SATA drives on either system while it they
are running (an impossibility on the Shuttle and merely very difficult
on the Epox) but this quirk made me curious.
John McGaw
http://johnmcgaw.com
[Knoxville, TN, USA]
Or, more precisely, what leads XP to decide what is removable and what
isn't? Example: System 1 is a P4 built in a Shuttle SFF case with the
provided MB; 1 SATA hard disk with three partitions, 1 DVD-ROM on PATA,
1 floppy on floppy channel, 1 multi-format flash reader on USB; the
system sees two of the flash slots as removable storage. System 2 is an
Athlon 64 built on an Epox Nvidia+ MB. 1 SATA hard disk (with two
partitions), 1 SATA DVD-ROM (using a bridge adapter), 4 hard disks on
PATA, 1 floppy on floppy channel, 1 multi-format flash reader on USB;
the system sees _both_ SATA drives as being removable along with two of
the flash slots. Either system properly sees an external hard disk on
USB or Firewire as being removable.
What leads the OS to think that SATA is removable on the second system
and not the first? Does the BIOS pass this information along or is it
something else? On the second system the C: drive is one of the SATA
partitions and the computer boots fine from it. It isn't as though I'm
going to start removing the SATA drives on either system while it they
are running (an impossibility on the Shuttle and merely very difficult
on the Epox) but this quirk made me curious.
John McGaw
http://johnmcgaw.com
[Knoxville, TN, USA]