It has been a while since I built a system. The last system I built was a K6-750 Oc'd to 822 on an Abit MB with 512 MB PC-133 and a TNT2 Ultra. Times have changed.
So, here I stand at the precipice of a momentous price/performance decision. I see such eye candy as the Clawhammer and NForce3_250 boards out there and wonder if the extra cost is worth it vs. a Barton 2500+ on an Nforce2 board OC'd to 3200+ with dual channel DDR. Also, I am curious if Dual Channel DDR is really going to make a noticeable performance difference from single channel. And, is SATA 150 so much faster than ATA/133 that I will cry myself to sleep if I opt for the ease of the latter?
So, here is the heart of the matter. Nforce2/Barton 2500-->3200/DC-DDR vs. Nforce3 150/250/ 3200+ Clawhammer/ DDR400. Socket 754 is going to be supplanted by Socket 939 and prices will fall accordingly, but my impression is that Socket A is alive and well since Barton 3700+ is just around the corner.
So, Barton now and Clawhammer later or Clawhammer now??
PS This will be a gaming system.
So, here I stand at the precipice of a momentous price/performance decision. I see such eye candy as the Clawhammer and NForce3_250 boards out there and wonder if the extra cost is worth it vs. a Barton 2500+ on an Nforce2 board OC'd to 3200+ with dual channel DDR. Also, I am curious if Dual Channel DDR is really going to make a noticeable performance difference from single channel. And, is SATA 150 so much faster than ATA/133 that I will cry myself to sleep if I opt for the ease of the latter?
So, here is the heart of the matter. Nforce2/Barton 2500-->3200/DC-DDR vs. Nforce3 150/250/ 3200+ Clawhammer/ DDR400. Socket 754 is going to be supplanted by Socket 939 and prices will fall accordingly, but my impression is that Socket A is alive and well since Barton 3700+ is just around the corner.
So, Barton now and Clawhammer later or Clawhammer now??
PS This will be a gaming system.