This guy really knows nothing about computers.
He thinks C/C++ programs aren't compiled INTO ASSEMBLY!
ie 32-bit or 64-bit ASSEMBLY.
ie twice as large files!
No I didn't, and 64-bit assembly is longer than 32-bit assembly for programs. Using more cpu usage.
And his argument to anything he can't refute is that HE DOESNT DO THAT so its not important. ie video editting.
Very few people actually do video editting, don't you need a program to even video edit? How many people out of the entire world of computer users actually have those programs?
But a lot of computer users edit their videos from their camcorders on their PC's. 64-bit would allow them to edit a lot larger files, easier, and higher res versions (ie when HD camcorders arrive).
Not everyone is getting a HD camcorder, and the claim that 64-bit allows them to edit a lot of larger files, easier, and higher res versions is completely FALSE.
This guy knows almost nothing about computers, he's just some teenager who's getting a kick baiting people, just spitting out the few terms he has memorized without using them properly.
all those sentences are nothing but opinions and assumptions.
ie. PAE is a hack to get around the 32 bit address limit. It allows processes to get access to 36-bit's worth of data using 32 bit addresses via segment registers.
WRONG, Its 40 bits on the PTE TABLE, 37bits can actually be used for PAE, to make 128GB, tard.
http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:8ThZ7y67oyUJ:www.intel.com/cd/ids/developer/asmo-na/eng/149307.htm
Under the table, you'll see an Intel non-EMT64 system has 40bit PA.
PAE is no HACK, its an innovative technological invention.
He doesnt even know what an analogy is. ie 16 bit is to 32 bit as 32 bit is to 64 bit. So talking about how people transitioned to 32-bit from 16-bit, and why some resisted, and why it took so long, MIRRORS what is happening in the transition to 64-bit.
WRONG, 8bit is to 32bit, as 16bit is to 64bit? I don't think so. You still have not given me ONE advantage 64bit offers over 32bit.
ie, saying the difference in 16-bit to 32-bit is extreme but the difference between 32-bit and 64-bit is hard to see.
The point is, it was hard to see back then too, because they didnt have the 32 bit applications yet. HIND SIGHT IS 20/20.
Yet, I have already seen 64bit applications, I am not impressed and it certianly doesn't live to the hype its been given. Windows Vista was *ported* to 32bit, why? Because they can program the operating system in both 32bit and 64bit without the limitations that operating systems had with 16bit.
And he is studid enough to say that whats the point of a 128-bit data bus when its not needed in the first place.
Tell that to the graphic card companies. Why did they go to 128-bit or even 256-bit data buses to their ram. BECAUSE IT WAS NEEDED TO IMPLEMENT THE NEWER FEATURES.
Go tell microsoft to up the limit of Windows Vista Starter from 256mb of ram to 4gb. Have you seen the price difference from 64-bit to 128-bit data bus? All these people telling me that the price is neglitiable bs. I am talkign about the cpu's, not gpu's. Gpu's do calculations that are different from the cpu.
If INTEL changed to a 256-bit interface to ram, they could jam more pixels into the SSE instructions at a time and do more powerful video processing. Which opens up entire new vistas of possible applications.
Wrong, A very very small minority of people do video processing, go ask the guy hanging out at mcdonalds what is 64bit, and if he encodes movies and video processes. Windows Vista in 32bit has the same functionality as Vista in 64bit, so your point? I seen different functionality of OS's from 16bit to 32bit.
But based on how this kid replies to messages he has no logical answer to, he will probably see I used the word "Vista" and go off on a tangent about Windows Vista instead of refuting the argument.
Your awnsers have very little logic in them, to you everyone in the world does video processing, everybody.
OK I WILL NOW STOP POSTING LOL.... action last one k...
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram