Which is easier for a GTX 750 Ti to run?

[Rationale]

I don't need the extra performance now in the games I play, but as I don't intend to upgrade my PC again for quite some time, I'd like to give myself some extra breathing room for next-gen. My video card is clearly going to be the weak point based on benchmarks.

So, assuming ultra settings, is it easier for a 2GB GTX 750 Ti to run games at 1366x768 at 60 fps, or 1920x1080 at 30 fps? Which would you consider higher quality or more efficient for the quality?

 

[Gamer AshRut]

1080p at any settings (low/med/high/ultra) would be better.Choose the best settings according to fps.

 

[Rationale]

1080p at any settings (low/med/high/ultra) would be better.Choose the best settings according to fps.

I'm not changing the settings either way, I already said that.

 

[Gamer AshRut]

Some new games would be unplayable at 1080p as their fps will be below 30.

 

[Gamer AshRut]

Metro last light , Crysis 3 , Watch Dogs...

 

[Rationale]

Metro last light , Crysis 3 , Watch Dogs...

Yes. Tested both Crysis 3 and Metro LL. Don't have Watchdogs, but benchmarks put the GTX 750 Ti above 30 fps on ultra regardless.

 

[Gamer AshRut]

But I saw some benchmarks, where the results were different.

 

[Gamer AshRut]

Those are avg fps. That means there will be dips under 30 and I was not guessing at all before answering any question I personally do research about it.
Anyways for better playability 768p would be better for that card.

 

[Gamer AshRut]

Watch Dogs is one of the worst optimized games. Even with much better cards such as GTX 660 the FPS drops to about 25 in some places.

 

[chimera201]

It really depends on the games that you play. If you are playing single-player slow APM games then 30 fps is enough. If you are playing competitive multi-player games then go for 60fps, 720p