Just curious ,
Why no one is making CPUs with odd numbers of cores ? like 3 ,5 7 ,9 , 15 , 31cores?
Why no one is making CPUs with odd numbers of cores ? like 3 ,5 7 ,9 , 15 , 31cores?
Just curious ,
Why no one is making CPUs with odd numbers of cores ? like 3 ,5 7 ,9 , 15 , 31cores?
Just curious ,
Why no one is making CPUs with odd numbers of cores ? like 3 ,5 7 ,9 , 15 , 31cores?
Just curious ,
Why no one is making CPUs with odd numbers of cores ? like 3 ,5 7 ,9 , 15 , 31cores?
Exactly, even x3 processors were actually 4 core with one disabled/deactivated (in various ways) because they didn't make it as "healthy" at same standards as other cores. If they were not far off they could usually be activated using some higher voltage if BIOS would allow it.Hi @nofanneeded
AMD did with their Tri core CPU's. As with any CPU really, but in years past, AMD was known for some of their CPU's having some of their cores locked, namely their earlier unlocked "Black Edition" (Tho those CPU's weren't only known for this) CPU's being able to be unlocked if paired with the correct motherboard and a healthy dose of luck.
Such as the AMD dual Core 7750 BE. There were a TON of people that were able to "unlock" an additional 2 cores on this particular CPU. Sadly while I still have my 7750 BE (and it still works) I was unable to get the additional 2 cores to run stable and so kept it "locked" at the stock 2. I remember I spent BANK on the mobo as well. I remember I drove 90 minutes to pick it up at a Fry's in another city. The name of it eludes me but I have it as well locked away in storage.
As for other odd # of CPU's, they are out there. I would hazard a guess that they are not a good overall use of silicone during the manufacturing process. If memory serves I heard ARM Cortex utilizes a 3 core processor but I'd have to google it to verify.