Why so many objections to Steam?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 21:49:49 GMT, Fisher <fisher@no_email.here> wrote:

>On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 21:41:31 GMT, Memnoch
><memnoch@nospampleaseimbritish.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
>
>>This seems to be the real issue here. Sooner or later everyone is going to
>>have broadband and then these kinds of arguments will be done and dusted. If
>>the updates were say <1MB guaranteed all the time, by some miracle, would you
>>still find it inconvenient?
>
>Just having broadband doesn't mean you have freedom to download as
>much data as you please. Most broadband ISP's limit how much data you
>can download per month.

True, but how often is Steam updated and how large are the downloads? If this
was of real concern then I would be more worried about the amount of continual
uploads and downloads during extended Internet play than one or two Steam
updates per month.
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

x-no-archive: yes

Highlandish wrote:

<snip>

this from the guy who spent 3 weeks downloading half-life 2
why don't you tell him you spent 3 weeks downloading your
precious half-life 2? don't you feel its relevant?
did you love spending 3 weeks downloading it?
and again you come to this group and DARE to admit pirating
pc games...
what a disgrace to this group and pc games

--
post made in a steam-free computer
i said "NO" to valve and steam
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

x-no-archive: yes

MB wrote:

> Please keep the thread civil and absent of flaming. I am

valve declared war against pc gamers worldwide so please
don't blame us for defending ourselves and our rights

its not our fault flames do occur in steam threads but its
cause steam is such a radical change in everything dealing
with pc games
with steam nothing stays the same and that's why nobody can
be indifferent to it... its too much change and too important
and when that happens the discussions are very heated up
you must realize this, steam changes everything in pc games
and those changes are very damaging to pc gamers and pc games
also don't forget for the first time a single player pc game
makes it mandatory you have a net connection for the only
purpose to humiliate you into asking for permission to use
the game... now for someone that doesn't have net connection
how do you expect he will feel about this? do you expect him
to be understanding about valve position or do you think he
should feel angry about it?
online "ask for permission" activation is totally GRATUITOUS!
pc gamers without net have every right to flame valve for it!

> just want to know why Steam is considered evil by some.

i used the word "evil" to describe steam and valve cause its
a system that specifically takes from pc gamers to give to
publishers
that's the philosophy being it
takes from us to give to them
and for me there is malice in valve attitude
they are doing all this to specifically damage us
they really didn't need to do it but they are
for me that is acting in a damaging way against pc gamers so
for me the word "evil" is totally appropriate

> installing a new patch every few weeks really annoys me.

in what pc game do you need to install a new patch every week?
that is insane!
i have installed, played, and finished lots of pc games with
version 1.0
i rarely need patches for my pc games much less WEEKLY PATCHES!
obviously this is valve plan to make you be dependant on patches
making you can't live without patches and being always patched,
why? this way they will always control you, you will always be
in their hands, you will always need to be connected and plugged
into valve
so needing weekly patches is a lie! another lie from valve

i bet they are planing in intentionally crippling the game so you
really have to patch it weekly and stay always connected to them
so they can much better control you

> Since my PC is usually on, the patches get installed while I

so basically its steam which controls your computer
its no longer YOUR computer but rather a valve computer
and btw do you have lots of cash to let your computer on for
8 or 9 straight hours doing nothing? are you whiling to burn that
much money? and don't you know electricity causes the green house
effect and that is damaging us all?
don't you know we are living in a energy crisis with oil going
up at record levels so waste is the last thing you should do

leaving your computer on doing nothing is a total waste!
yes even if in save mode or stand by mode its still a waste

> am at work, thus CS:Source is always "ready to play".

every proper pc game is always "ready to play" out of the box
but with steam based games you must "wait" for valve to say
its "ready to play", so who controls your life? you or valve?
when you buy a normal pc game you decide when to play but you
let valve change all this with steam based pc games!
with steam and valve you will only be ready to play when they
decide!
with steam they decide when its time for you to play not you!
with steam they order and you obey!
do you accept this?
do you accept this humiliation and control over you?
do you accept being a puppet in valve's hands?

> I bought HL2 in a retail box, the good old fashioned way.

i'm sorry if i'm being too harsh but the issues are too much
important for me to be soft
hl2 retail was NOT sold in a good old fashioned way!
hl2 retail is an ABERRATION!
hl2 retail is a LIE!
even vivendi the retail publisher of hl2 stop selling it cause
it could not longer keep on with this disgusting lie and this
clear attack to consumer rights
germany authorities forced changed into the hl2 cover labeling
cause it was so wrong and didn't respect consumer rights
hl2 retail featured steam infection inside the cd and hidden
from consumers!
valve hide steam from customers!
there were hundreds of complain from pc gamers that didn't know
about steam and what it meant when they bought hl2 in a store
valve used hl2 retail to spread the steam infection to the very
healthy and essential retail pc game market to gain with it so
it later could kill it
without retail steam could have never survived
with fair competition with retail, steam WOULD ALWAYS LOOSE!
steam alone can't survive, and that's why they tried to use the
retail market
we demand a STEAM FREE retail market!
no steam in retail market!
if valve wants to impose steam do it only via the internet and
only in electronic distribution and never using the retail
channel which is what they tried to do with hl2

> If buying online was ten bucks cheaper I might have

via steam electronic distribution the price of hl2 was and
has stayed high since the start
valve has already said they will not lower the price cause
maintaining the steam server is too expensive so they need
to feed it with selling their pc games at high prices

cause steam means monopoly it will kill retail discounts
and will bring much higher prices of pc games

via steam electronic distribution there will be no competition
cause with steam its monopoly and so with no competition prices
will stay high and will not come down
hl2 via steam electronic distribution was released 8 months ago
and you see prices staying high and will not drop

what proper retail pc game titles stays with the same price as
release after 8 months? NONE! none except steam infected ones

no competition means higher prices and monopoly
so with steam pc game prices will go up not down
a clear reason why steam is wrong

> considered it but it wasn't it, so for my dollar I want a
> printed manual and a box etc.

if you want a printed manual and a box you must fight against
steam and valve!
steam wants to kill the packaged physical cd/dvd box product
in pc games!
no the hl2 retail thing was not it, it was a lie! lie!
the hl2 that appeared in retail was a total ABERRATION
steam has no place in retail!
steam has no place in a cd!
the retail market has been the best place to buy pc games for
the best prices and in a proper box but always clean of steam
infection
NO STEAM INFECTION IN THE RETAIL CHANNEL!
that's extremely important!

> So, why do others hate Steam?

i already gave you plenty of them
there are dozens and dozens of reasons why steam is so wrong

i already told you some like...

taking away freedom of choice
.. being a system that changes everything in pc games with the
purpose of taking away freedom of choice from pc gamers and
giving publishers more power

net connection mandatory
.. forcing you to have a net connection for a single player pc
game when many pc gamers don't have net connection in the pc
they use for gaming

not thinking about dial-up users
.. with a system so dependant on net connection and so demanding
for bandwidth, dial-up users which have narrow bandwidth and pay
by the minute have been totally neglected and forgotten by valve

humiliating ask for permission
.. forcing you to have to humiliate yourself by asking for
permission to use a product you just have bought which is
what happens with the activation process used in hl2 retail

playing games stoped being anonymous
.. valve forces you to identify yourself before they let you play
a game you have just bought so no longer playing pc games will
be anonymous and your right for privacy is violated

controlling when you can play and not yourself
.. with steam you no longer have the freedom and control to
when be able to play the pc game you have bought but its now
valve who decides when can you play the game you just bought

no patches available in individual files for manual patch
.. steam takes the possibility of being able to patch the game
manually and being able to have patches in individual files
that can be easily distributed and passed along so others
which don't have fast internet access or not at all can also
be able to patch the game

being forced to make huge downloads to play a game
.. when the first time you install hl2 retail you are not only
forced to humiliate yourself by asking permission to use a
product you just bought but also you are forced to download
a huge amount of data that in a dial-up connection can take
long hours to complete and cost alot for those paying by the
minute, and i've seen pc gamers saying they waited as long as
6 hours!

killing the second hands market
.. with steam valve is trying to kill the second hand market
and again taking away choice from pc gamers and taking away
a cheap alternative to buy pc games at low prices

creating a monopoly buy forcing you to buy only from one place
.. with steam you can only buy from one place creating a clear
monopoly in pc games with all the damage that brings to us

killing the retail market
.. being also a distribution system steam wants to kill the
retail market which is the best for low prices and fair
competition and easy access

needing a credit card to pay for pc games
.. making it required a credit card to pay for pc games when
the majority of pc gamers don't have it shows how valve does
give a damn about us

killing pc games as a packaged physical cd/dvd box product
.. forget about what you saw in retail with hl2 which was a
total disgusting lie, the facts are clear, steam wants to
kill pc games as box products so they become downloadable
only which is wrong and damaging to us pc gamers cause its
in a proper box in a proper physical medium that pc games
must always be!

lots of hidden costs to deal with
.. not only the games itself are expensive but steam based pc
games have lots of hidden costs like needing to pay for net
access and needing to pay for a dvd recorder and a dvd blank
medium which doesn't happen with a proper boxed games cause
they are self contained and play instantly out of the box

trying to turn pc games into an expensive elitist hobby
.. with broadband as MANDATORY and with higher prices and the
need to have a credit card, valve using steam wants to make
pc games an expensive elitist hobby when now its a popular
democratic affordable one

the first step for the much feared software as service
.. steam is the first step into making software and with valve
pc games specifically into services making the customer have
ZERO control over the way he uses the software, software as a
service is the dream for publishers cause they will have total
control over consumer and a COMPLETE NIGHTMARE TO US CUSTOMERS

don't know if i'm forgetting some important issue in steam
cause there are so many that sometimes i forget one or two

there would be more to say and write about the damage steam
does but i guess for now its enough to see we all must fight
against it
join us! fight along us against steam!
boycott any steam based pc game!
its the future of pc games that is in stake!
protect your favorite hobby!
long live pc games steam free!

--
post made in a steam-free computer
i said "NO" to valve and steam
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

"Magnulus" <magnulus@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:WwuAe.70358$du.28157@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
> I don't like having to activate Steam to play offline. I don't like the
> possibility in the future I won't be able to play the game. So I haven't
> bought it.

I understand you not liking the activation but you haven't bought it because
there may be a potential possibility that one day you may not be able to
play it? Doesn't make sense to me. You are avoiding playing it because you
may possibly one day not be able to play it? 🙂

I bought HL2 in November (retail), played it half a dozen times (it really
is good) and if Valve close down tomorrow (which they wont) then I'll mourn
the passing of a great developer but I'll be playing other games by other
developers. If I ever do want to play it again then you and I know that
there is already a crack for HL2 - if I wanted to I'd be able to play HL2
even if Valve implode

> I also don't like the fact that, despite the lower costs for Valve, they
> don't pass any of the savings onto the consumer. 55 dollars for a game
> that
> is pure profit for Valve is IMO a losing proposition for consumers. We
> aren't talking about Garage Games here, which sells their downloaded games
> for 10 bucks or so.

Agree that Valve should pass on some of the savings they make bypassing a
distributor. However I do think that Valve should get those profits and put
a large percentage back into developing new games rather than paying
distributors. Business model is nearly right - needs tweaking.

> PC games are too expensive already, there's an upwards price trend. I
> personally cannot afford to spend any more than 30-35 bucks on any game.
> Paying 50-60 bucks for a game that makes playing it a hassle is just not
> worth it.

If you are on dial up or metered broadband then yes it must a PITA but I
have 1MB BB here and have never had any kind of hassle with Steam. Can't
argue with you on prices though.
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

"Kroagnon" <kroagnon@kroagnon.com> wrote in message
news:11d64bogg7fat15@news.supernews.com...
>
> "Andrew" <spamtrap@localhost.> wrote in message
> news:1j34d1ddd8rcs127i1hgef4c11j33t7aqc@4ax.com...
>>>Just curious. I know some folks don't like it, but I apparently
>>>missed all the hoopla.
>>
>> There are two complete idiots in this group that hate it and they
>> create 99.9999% of the noise on the issue. There are a few normal
>> contributors that don't like it, probably mainly because they don't
>> have broadband at home or the patience/dialup package to use it via a
>> modem. Most of the rest of us who have broadband and have actually
>> used Steam are quite happy with it.
>
> Your dismissal of everyone who brings up valid reasons why they dislikes
> Steam reduces what little credibility you have left on this issue even
> further.
>

I read it that he dismisses two idiots only.
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

"Kroagnon" <kroagnon@kroagnon.com> wrote in message
news:11d65ce14a711a9@news.supernews.com...
>
> "John Lewis" <john.dsl@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:42d29d41.13078192@news.verizon.net...
>
>> And Ritual's proposed download price of $20 per episode of Sin 2
>> for about 6 hours of play is about the going RETAIL rate. Serious Sam
>> 1 and 2 were both $19.99 (retail) for a lot more than 6 hours of
>> play.
>
> There will be something like 6 SiN2 episodes at $20 each... that's $120
> for a single game without any installation media or anything tangible.
> Total ripoff.
>

Depends. What is the average length of a game - around 18 to 20hrs? 6 x
6rh episodes will give you 36hrs of gameplay. Roughly double for roughly
double the price. Just thinking out loud here - will wait and see.
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 21:41:31 GMT, Memnoch
<memnoch@nospampleaseimbritish.ntlworld.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 16:23:04 GMT, john.dsl@verizon.net (John Lewis) wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:10:48 +0100, Andrew <spamtrap@localhost.>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 12:48:12 GMT, riku <riku@none.invalid.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>So how would the Steam approach worked in the same situation, if BF2
>>>>had been a Steam game? Does Steam make its games immune to problems in
>>>>patches, and does it somehow make it possible to revert back to old
>>>>patch/original installation without having to reinstall the game or
>>>>reverting to earlier backups of the game? It doesn't.
>>>
>>>In the early days of HL2 a patch was issued then within a day or two
>>>revoked, all I had to do was wait a couple of minutes while Steam took
>>>care of everything, never having to worry about what was happening
>>>under the hood.
>>
>>Sure, not having to worry about the 50 Meg or so of download to
>>unfix the broken patch. Nice to have unmetered broadband.
>
>This seems to be the real issue here. Sooner or later everyone is going to
>have broadband and then these kinds of arguments will be done and dusted. If
>the updates were say <1MB guaranteed all the time, by some miracle, would you
>still find it inconvenient?

Yes, since I can install a single-player game, spool the latest patch
from a CD and run the game without ever going anywhere near the
Internet, regardless of the reliability of Steam, my ISP, or the
phases of the moon. Seems as if we have too many people
bending over and holding their ankles for the benefit of a few
greedy game developers.

John Lewis
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 00:24:02 +0100, "Shawk"
<shawk@clara.co.uk.3guesses> wrote:

>
>"Magnulus" <magnulus@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>news:WwuAe.70358$du.28157@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
>> I don't like having to activate Steam to play offline. I don't like the
>> possibility in the future I won't be able to play the game. So I haven't
>> bought it.
>
>I understand you not liking the activation but you haven't bought it because
>there may be a potential possibility that one day you may not be able to
>play it? Doesn't make sense to me. You are avoiding playing it because you
>may possibly one day not be able to play it? 🙂
>
>I bought HL2 in November (retail), played it half a dozen times (it really
>is good) and if Valve close down tomorrow (which they wont) then I'll mourn
>the passing of a great developer but I'll be playing other games by other
>developers. If I ever do want to play it again then you and I know that
>there is already a crack for HL2

How nice... but I have just a little moral problem with cracks; so
I have chosen not to buy any single-player games that require Steam
or similar on-line authentication, hence any such dilemma will never
arise for me.

Can't say that I have missed much.

John Lewis

> - if I wanted to I'd be able to play HL2
>even if Valve implode
>
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

I wonder why the Steam opponents haven't objected to Bioware's way of
delivering their premium modules yet. They don't use Steam, but the
only way to buy those modules is from their online store, and even
after you have registered and activated the module, the game still
verify it every time when you load a saved game. Heh.
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

Kroagnon wrote:
> > So, why do others hate Steam?
>
> To start: The fact that you cannot play the game without registering to
> Valve. The fact that you can't play the game after registration without
> periodic authentication in "offline" mode. The fact that you cannot make any
> manual decisions on patches.
>
> It's all well and good that you like having your decisions made for you with
> no choice on the matter, but I don't want to be told by Valve or any other
> game company what and when I can do with the game that I paid money for.
> Thus, I will never buy a game that requires Steam.

All good reasons but the most important, to me anyway, is that Valve is
greedy with their invention. It's well and good if a software company
can reduce costs to ship their game. Distributors are expensive and
have a virtual monopoly after all. But after the reduced cost using
Steam the game is still full price. Logically, shouldn't it cost less?

Now, Steam is an expensive product and they have to pay for that too.
They have to pay for bandwidth, the servers, and the maintenance of the
software. But once the cost of the investment is absorbed do you think
the price of games will go down? They answer is of course "No." In
addition, they built Steam behind Vivendi's back. Why would they do
that? Why not be honest with a company they have a relationship with?


Furthermore, you are simply not allowed to transfer your ownership of
the game. Want to sell Half-Life II on Ebay? Too bad. I can't think
of a single product, other than Half-Life 2 that I fully own and cannot
resell. It wouldn't be difficult to just sell your Steam account, but
under their license agreement you cannot. Why? The answer if of
course "more money for us."

I will *NEVER* purchase another product via Steam. Nothing irritates
me more than being duped by greedy people. Somewhere in the Valve
offices is a spreadsheet with a bar chart showing massively higher
profits by cutting out the distributor. That's great, but not at my
expense. I vote with my dollar, and until the online delivery is
better than boxed games then they don't get my money.

It would have been SO much easier to just electronically distribute the
install files for HL2 and keep the old or modified registration key
system. Instead they built a client application and a complex
licensing system in attempt to become the new monopoly. Were they
afriad of pirates? HL2 was on the torrent minutes after it was
released. Valve is trying to become the new distributor of software in
the industry and I don't like where it's headed. As a consumer I am
worse off, and it doesn't need to be that way.
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:02:41 -0600, "Hank the Rapper"
<xflopgoon@REMOVEyahoo.com> wrote:

>Memnoch wrote:
>
>> And also I know the main reason is they want my e-mail address and
>> stick me on yet another list. I get enough junk e-mail as it is and
>> if I can download patches for their games without registering then I
>> will.
>
>There is an easy way around that. Set up a free yahoo account. I used to

Problem with free email accounts: they are usually temporary unless
you keep on checking them regularly. I think free Hotmail accounts
expire in a few months if you don't log into it to check your mail.

Sometimes our life keeps us out of gaming for months, or checking some
free email accounts regularly just to keep them active. If your email
address expires, you'll be in trouble if there's some other trouble
with your Steam account (you forgot the Steam password, your account
was hijacked (because you use the same password everywhere to remember
it more easily 😉 etc.). See: http://tinyurl.com/ax2am
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 21:28:55 GMT, Memnoch
<memnoch@nospampleaseimbritish.ntlworld.com> wrote:

>Totally agree with that. If I want to play one of the few online mods it is
>just a few mouseclicks away. In comparison, downloading updates from Windows
>Update is more involved.

You seem to be completely unaware that it would be possible to offer
automatic updates without requiring one to validate his single-player
games online. These two things are in no way related to each others.

You Steam proponents make the same mistake over and over again, you
act as if it would not be possible to have the advantages of Steam
without the disadvantages. Wrong.
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 21:39:58 GMT, Memnoch
<memnoch@nospampleaseimbritish.ntlworld.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:10:48 +0100, Andrew <spamtrap@localhost.> wrote:
>
>>In the early days of HL2 a patch was issued then within a day or two
>>revoked, all I had to do was wait a couple of minutes while Steam took
>>care of everything, never having to worry about what was happening
>>under the hood. After getting used to the convenience of Steam, having
>>to manually patch games seems so old fashioned.
>
>That's how I remember it. The only reason I knew it happened was because I
>keep an eye on the News pages every so often. Another example of how painless
>the whole process was.

Yet, it would be fully possible to have that feature WITHOUT requiring
online validation for single-player games, or restricting Steam game
transfers between Steam accounts. Most of the Steam drawbacks and
advantages are not closely related.
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 00:24:02 +0100, "Shawk"
<shawk@clara.co.uk.3guesses> wrote:

>I bought HL2 in November (retail), played it half a dozen times (it really
>is good) and if Valve close down tomorrow (which they wont) then I'll mourn
>the passing of a great developer but I'll be playing other games by other
>developers. If I ever do want to play it again then you and I know that
>there is already a crack for HL2 - if I wanted to I'd be able to play HL2
>even if Valve implode

Think out of the box. Let's say you own a couple dozen Steam-released
games which you wished to play later as well, some of which you
possibly haven't played properly yet. Steam closes down. You go like
"Oh well, they are just games, $50-70 a pop", and/or start hunting
(illegal) cracks for them all over the net?

You don't see any problem having to start hunting for cracks to play
your legally bought games?

Ps. According to DMCA and Euro-DMCA, the cracks are illegal because
they circumvent copy protections. Plus, they may contain viruses or
trojans.

>If you are on dial up or metered broadband then yes it must a PITA but I
>have 1MB BB here and have never had any kind of hassle with Steam.

Remember to check BEFOREHAND that your installed Steam games really
work in offline mode (automatic updates disabled for all of them etc.)
in case you lose your internet connection due to a move or something
else.

I didn't because I PRESUMED it would work automatically in offline
mode if one loses the internet connection as it has been claimed here
several times, but at least in my case it didn't work. I was unable to
play my new shiny (installed & validated) HL2 for several weeks until
I got my new ADSL line.
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

"John Lewis" <john.dsl@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:42d33059.50739561@news.verizon.net...
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 00:24:02 +0100, "Shawk"
> <shawk@clara.co.uk.3guesses> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Magnulus" <magnulus@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>>news:WwuAe.70358$du.28157@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
>>> I don't like having to activate Steam to play offline. I don't like
>>> the
>>> possibility in the future I won't be able to play the game. So I
>>> haven't
>>> bought it.
>>
>>I understand you not liking the activation but you haven't bought it
>>because
>>there may be a potential possibility that one day you may not be able to
>>play it? Doesn't make sense to me. You are avoiding playing it because
>>you
>>may possibly one day not be able to play it? 🙂
>>
>>I bought HL2 in November (retail), played it half a dozen times (it really
>>is good) and if Valve close down tomorrow (which they wont) then I'll
>>mourn
>>the passing of a great developer but I'll be playing other games by other
>>developers. If I ever do want to play it again then you and I know that
>>there is already a crack for HL2
>
> How nice... but I have just a little moral problem with cracks; so
> I have chosen not to buy any single-player games that require Steam
> or similar on-line authentication, hence any such dilemma will never
> arise for me.

How upstanding of you..... but there is no moral issue with playing a game
you have paid for. It's a change to a couple of files to make it work
better. No difference morally to using Werners patch for Vampires or going
into Doom config and changing settings.

> Can't say that I have missed much.

You have but you're happy and I'm happy so what's it matter.
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

"Hank the Rapper" <xflopgoon@REMOVEyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:sLKdnYKaTJRBuU7fRVn-pQ@comcast.com...

>> There will be something like 6 SiN2 episodes at $20 each... that's
>> $120 for a single game without any installation media or anything
>> tangible. Total ripoff.
> It is a rip off but would it be a better rip off if people paid $20 for
> each episode that was released in retail because they had a disc? This is
> not the fault of Steam. It is the fault of Ritual. They are the ones who
> want to do it. Personally, I think it will fail.

Oh I agree that the price is the fault of Ritual. Just as the full price of
HL2 on Steam is the fault of Valve.

On the other hand, if it wasn't for Steam then Sin2 wouldn't exist. Ritual
ouldn't find a publisher for it given the poor sales of the last one. Due to
them releasing a super buggy SiN 1.0, entirely Ritual's fault.

That being said, $20 per episode is too much.
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

The consensus seems to be that Steam is not a very good idea for PC gamers
and consumers. A few people seem to think Steam is OK. I've only seen a
few people on the Net saying Steam is the glorious "wave of the future".
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

Because it's an anagram of 'meats', and vegetarians don't like it.
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 09:21:06 +0100, "Shawk"
<shawk@clara.co.uk.3guesses> wrote:

>> How nice... but I have just a little moral problem with cracks; so
>> I have chosen not to buy any single-player games that require Steam
>> or similar on-line authentication, hence any such dilemma will never
>> arise for me.
>
>How upstanding of you..... but there is no moral issue with playing a game
>you have paid for. It's a change to a couple of files to make it work
>better. No difference morally to using Werners patch for Vampires or going
>into Doom config and changing settings.

Cracks are illegal, and may easily contain viruses or trojans.
Changing your Doom config settings don't have similar risks.
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

"riku" <riku@none.invalid.com> wrote in message
news:st27d110env349gk15t9t5hres95n9ut1d@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 00:24:02 +0100, "Shawk"
> <shawk@clara.co.uk.3guesses> wrote:
>
>>I bought HL2 in November (retail), played it half a dozen times (it really
>>is good) and if Valve close down tomorrow (which they wont) then I'll
>>mourn
>>the passing of a great developer but I'll be playing other games by other
>>developers. If I ever do want to play it again then you and I know that
>>there is already a crack for HL2 - if I wanted to I'd be able to play HL2
>>even if Valve implode
>
> Think out of the box. Let's say you own a couple dozen Steam-released
> games which you wished to play later as well, some of which you
> possibly haven't played properly yet. Steam closes down. You go like
> "Oh well, they are just games, $50-70 a pop", and/or start hunting
> (illegal) cracks for them all over the net?
>
> You don't see any problem having to start hunting for cracks to play
> your legally bought games?
>
> Ps. According to DMCA and Euro-DMCA, the cracks are illegal because
> they circumvent copy protections. Plus, they may contain viruses or
> trojans.
>
>>If you are on dial up or metered broadband then yes it must a PITA but I
>>have 1MB BB here and have never had any kind of hassle with Steam.
>
> Remember to check BEFOREHAND that your installed Steam games really
> work in offline mode (automatic updates disabled for all of them etc.)
> in case you lose your internet connection due to a move or something
> else.
>
> I didn't because I PRESUMED it would work automatically in offline
> mode if one loses the internet connection as it has been claimed here
> several times, but at least in my case it didn't work. I was unable to
> play my new shiny (installed & validated) HL2 for several weeks until
> I got my new ADSL line.
>

I dont disagree with a single thing you say.

Ref the automatic updates I thought that had been fixed with a patch - it
was pointed out to me that there were still problems. I'm currently testing
this - have blocked Steam and HL2 in my firewall and it plays fine so far
(two weeks now).

Of course we're only talking SP. If I wanted to play MP I may find that as
soon as I unblock the game in the firewall the SP will want to update
itself - I'll test that too after a few more weeks. So far it seems that if
you block it through your firewall it behaves as any other SP game except
for lack of patches (PC Gamer did however release those on a disk recently -
I'm keeping my eyes open to see whether that was a one off or will be
regular).
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 08:55:25 GMT, riku <riku@none.invalid.com> wrote:

>You seem to be completely unaware that it would be possible to offer
>automatic updates without requiring one to validate his single-player
>games online. These two things are in no way related to each others.

Yes it would be possible, but at present a miniscule percentage (I
don't have any non-MMORPG games that do so) of non-Steam games
actually do so. Steam is delivering today.
--
Andrew, contact via interpleb.blogspot.com
Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim replies to quote only relevant text.
Check groups.google.com before asking an obvious question.
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 06:48:00 GMT, Fisher <fisher@no_email.here> wrote:

>On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 07:19:38 +0100, Andrew <spamtrap@localhost.>
>wrote:
>
>
>>There are two complete idiots in this group that hate it and they
>>create 99.9999% of the noise on the issue. There are a few normal
>>contributors that don't like it, probably mainly because they don't
>>have broadband at home or the patience/dialup package to use it via a
>>modem. Most of the rest of us who have broadband and have actually
>>used Steam are quite happy with it.
>
>Anyone who *likes* product activation and hours of their time wasted
>is a surrender monkey.

Windows is a multi-tasking system. If you can't play the game during the
domnload, you can do something else (e.g. do homework, play a game, etc.)

In the event that your system is single tasking (e.g. DOS), then you can do
something that does not involve computers. There's plenty of reading
material at the local library in case you don't have any ideas.

Meanwhile, I'll claim the master of obvious award.
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

Memnoch wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 13:42:06 +0200, Walter Mitty <mitticus@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>mattchu wrote:
>>
>>>Andrew wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 06:48:00 GMT, Fisher <fisher@no_email.here> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>There are two complete idiots in this group that hate it and they
>>>>>>create 99.9999% of the noise on the issue. There are a few normal
>>>>>>contributors that don't like it, probably mainly because they don't
>>>>>>have broadband at home or the patience/dialup package to use it via a
>>>>>>modem. Most of the rest of us who have broadband and have actually
>>>>>>used Steam are quite happy with it.
>>>>>
>>>>>Anyone who *likes* product activation and hours of their time wasted
>>>>>is a surrender monkey.
>>>>
>>>>Make that three idiots.
>>>
>>>
>>>Might as well make it four then by that logic. Steam is a step in the
>>>wrong direction. What's the point to forcing Steam onto a system and
>>>making paying customers register the product they bought? 'To stop
>>>pirates'? It happens anyways! Sin 2 might be the first game I buy
>>>with Steam included since the first entries into the Sin series were
>>>loads of fun, but we'll have to wait and see.
>>>
>>
>>To prove you bought it. Whats so hard to understand?
>>
>>Or does it hurt your feelings?
>>
>>By your rational you should be able to walk out of a store with a color
>>tv under your arm and not be challenged as to whether you paid for it.
>
>
> He has a fair point there to be honest. I never register any of my games
> normally. The only ones I have required CD keys for online play. I don't do
> this for any other reason than I cannot be bothered. And also I know the main
> reason is they want my e-mail address and stick me on yet another list. I get
> enough junk e-mail as it is and if I can download patches for their games
> without registering then I will.

Use a token yahoo or gmail email account for this stuff. Easy.

--
Walter Mitty
-
Useless, waste of money research of the day : http://tinyurl.com/3tdeu
" Format wars could 'confuse users'"
http://www.tinyurl.com
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

On 12 Jul 2005 05:13:42 -0700, dangtranvu@netscape.net wrote:

>I wonder why the Steam opponents haven't objected to Bioware's way of
>delivering their premium modules yet. They don't use Steam, but the
>only way to buy those modules is from their online store, and even
>after you have registered and activated the module, the game still
>verify it every time when you load a saved game. Heh.

1. What "modules"? Are you talking about single-player or multiplayer
games? In Steam's case we are talking about high-profile single-player
games (like HL2 and Sin Episodes).

2. What makes you think it isn't objected as well? Maybe the "modules"
are not just important enough that anyone would discuss about them
specifically here in an action gaming group?

Is your point supposed to be that because there are other screwy
things going on, Steam is ok? Or what?
 
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action (More info?)

stePH wrote:

> MB <nospam@please.net> wrote:
>
>
>>Please keep the thread civil and absent of flaming.
>
>
> LOL, good luck with that.
>
>
> stePH

Hehehe. Last night preparing Half Life 2 through Steam was one of the
most infuriating experiences I've had in the history of PC gaming. Like
I told earlier, I had to reinstall Windows XP for the sake of a troijan
virus, which had infiltrated my system somehow and rebooted my PC for no
apparent reason. Reinstalling and activating WinXP was smooth and
pretty fast. But then Steam update had some integrated mistakes with
the last Half Life install, And I got really frustrated by the
information on the screen showing that I'd have to wait 8000 minutes
before the game would run. I was laughing out loud by myself, reading
the posts in here about Steam, sweating in the computer room chuckling
like I'd be a bad Eddie Murphy clone. Then I finally decided to
reinstall Half Life 2 all over again from a DVD and destroying my HF2
and Steam folders. Either I had some real bad luck last night or
something, but the installing didn't go smoothly even from a DVD and I
had to retry about 7 times before I saw Half Life 2 was set into my D:
drive. And _still_ I had to wait for the first gaming preparation for
one hour and 30 minutes. If anything, I think Steam is very
entertaining in its own macabre way.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.