I think we are splitting hairs here. Most readers are surely looking at the piece with a mind to getting a feel of the product right? And I echo the opinion that this piece was less than satisfactory due to the insistance on running the GUI in classic mode.
Another observation is that it would have been more useful to have installed Vista on a "known system" to avoid commentary on features that did not work due to a switch that was not set.
While most readers (I suppose you got that from Gartner, right?

) seem to be quite dissatisfied with the article, which i can understand, this does stem from a general misconception.
No, it´s not splitting hairs if i say this is not a review. Doing a review means stating facts, backing them with proof, quoting your sources and generally having a rather scientific apporoach. The article mentioned in the title has nothing scientific, nothing review like at all. It´s a blog-style diary.
If you read it expecting a review you´ll be disappointed, because it´s not a review. Let me say it once more, just to be clear and make sure that everyone read it: It´s not a review. NOT-A-REVIEW. Nada, zilch, njet review.
It´s nothing more than what a single user thinks about vista while using it. And, oh my, that user doesn´t like the new GUI and switches back to the classic one! Disaster is upon us! The heathens are coming to eat our souls!
What´s next, is someone going to forbid people to wear green shoes or buy chocolate icecream because they don´t like them? It´s an opinion and everyone is entitled to have one. If you don´t share the authors opinion, great! That makes two of us, but it doesn´t matter.
If a user expects a review, clicks on the link, reads the article and at the end wonders why the author rants about the laptop or why there are no performance charts or comparisons with different computers, then that reader should have stopped reading right after the title. Maybe the author should have put a big warning sign next to the article stating "there is no review here, go away". I would´ve felt pretty insulted by being treated like a six year old. But maybe that´s just me.
It´s exactly the opposite that happend. I assume the author expected the audience (that´s us) to see the article as a diary (as written in the title) and not as a review. In turn, this means the audience is treated like grown ups with the mental capacity to outsmart a wet breadroll at least. Yet, a lot of people fail at that. That´s why its not splitting hairs to say its not a review.
I have to agree that i didn´t expect to find a blog on the thg front page, but i knew what i was about to read, since its clearly written all across it, so i´m not really dissappointed. It wasn´t a bad article. Maybe a little odd to see it on the frontpage, but not bad.
PS: I already know that some smartasses will cling to the "but i wanted to see the new GUI in this review" attitude. Well, welcome to the kindergarten. Its inevitable. Heck, it could a variation of Murphy's law. :?