G
Guest
Guest
Archived from groups: alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt (More info?)
Mxsmanic wrote:
> Conor writes:
>
>
>>Very good. By full speed do you mean it was running at 100% CPU usage?
>
>
> Slightly beyond 100%,
A mathematical impossibility.
> because of hyperthreading.
Hyperthreading gets it closer to 100% than it could get without it.
>>So what actual CPU speed was that 100% usage, the CPU rated speed or
>>what it had throttled down to?
>
>
> Full speed, since there was no indication of diminished performance.
> The processor temperature was only 55-58° C, well below the
> temperature at which throttling would occur. I've never seen it above
> 60° C, and it only gets that high for very brief periods (until the
> fan speeds up).
>
> --
> Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
Mxsmanic wrote:
> Conor writes:
>
>
>>Very good. By full speed do you mean it was running at 100% CPU usage?
>
>
> Slightly beyond 100%,
A mathematical impossibility.
> because of hyperthreading.
Hyperthreading gets it closer to 100% than it could get without it.
>>So what actual CPU speed was that 100% usage, the CPU rated speed or
>>what it had throttled down to?
>
>
> Full speed, since there was no indication of diminished performance.
> The processor temperature was only 55-58° C, well below the
> temperature at which throttling would occur. I've never seen it above
> 60° C, and it only gets that high for very brief periods (until the
> fan speeds up).
>
> --
> Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.