oxiide :
But no one made such a claim. Anywhere. It is literally just about claiming a world record, and I don't think this poor, unsuspecting news article has tried to advertise it as anything more.
Nobody is saying the article advertised a world-record that accomplished anything useful.
What most people including myself are bashing here is is the very concept of overclocking contest where the "world record" does not have to be capable of accomplishing anything useful. The whole point of overclocking is to make programs run faster but these overclocking records cannot run anything useful.
This is a bit like saying your race car's engine runs at world-record 100k RPM... but would self-destruct as soon as you shift it out of parked/neutral because the crankshaft is barely strong enough to handle the engine's own compression and drag forces. Come again when you can show me that 100k RPM in whatever gear you need to put it in to hit at least highway cruising speeds.