XBox 360 vs Playstation 3

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.sony-playstation2,alt.games.video.xbox (More info?)

Doug Jacobs <djacobs@shell.rawbw.com> wrote:
>As both the PS1 and PS2 showed, it takes a good 12-18 months before you'll
>start getting good games for the console to appear. However, during this

And as the DC and XBox showed, you /can/ launch with a decent
lineup.

--
"Well, of course I would never use a preposition to finish a sentence up
with, because it might be difficult to make sense out of, and after all,
what would I want to use a preposition to finish a sentence that you cannot
make any sense out of up with for?" - Robert Lodge, Bulwer-Lytton entry.
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.final-fantasy,alt.games.video.sony-playstation2,alt.games.video.xbox,rec.sport.pro-wrestling,rec.sport.football.college (More info?)

QuantumHED wrote:
> absolutely not. It is the same as with the PS2. The ps1 architecture is
> completely different from the PS2 and the same goes for the PS3. Both
> systems will be emulated with raw cpu power and believe me there is no
> downside...at this point we can actually run those systems several times
> there normal clock and they would still hold up.

Look everyone, it's an actual Sony engineer posting to usenet.

Oh wait, you're just some idiot spouting off, aren't you?

--
Rockboy
Everybody's all right
Everything is automatic
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.final-fantasy,alt.games.video.sony-playstation2,alt.games.video.xbox,rec.sport.pro-wrestling,rec.sport.football.college (More info?)

Krusty killed six kittens after typing this:

> "Chris Boyd" <theurge14@ALREADY.yahoo.HAVE.ENOUGH.SPAM.com.THANKS>
> wrote...
>> Which all are available as freeware emulators for the PC, including
>> the ROMS if you know where to look.
>>
>> I'm still not sure about Duck Hunt, but I think I can make my webcam
>> work with it somehow. I'll probabably end up shooting the dog and
>> losing.
>
> I don't want to sit in front of a computer monitor to play them, I
> want to play them on my nice, big, widescreen TV, which sits in the
> main room of my house. I don't want to string cables to my TV from my
> laptop to have to do it either. Keep your ROMS and your downloads and
> your PC. I'd like to be able to play them using a Nintendo Controller,
> with my wife and kids all sitting on the sofa. Not crammed around a
> computer monitor.
>
> Not all of us live in dorm rooms and are 17.


Well, apparently some of us live in dorm rooms and are 33.




--
Chris Boyd
RSFC's 8 of Clubs

---
Still can't get enough? theurge14@SPAM.IS.yahoo.SO.TRITE.com
---
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.final-fantasy,alt.games.video.sony-playstation2,alt.games.video.xbox,rec.sport.pro-wrestling,rec.sport.football.college (More info?)

Boody Bandit wrote:
> "Fred Liken" <fredliken@toocool4school.com> wrote in message
> news:428b6271$0$79387$bb4e3ad8@newscene.com...
>
>
>>Who cares about PS1 games... and who even played PS1 games on their PS2,
>>anyways?
>
>
> I did for a year after the PS2 was released.
> My kids still play PS1 games on their PS2's.

Two to one Krusty.

--
Rockboy
Everybody's all right
Everything is automatic
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.final-fantasy,alt.games.video.sony-playstation2,alt.games.video.xbox,rec.sport.pro-wrestling,rec.sport.football.college (More info?)

Krusty wrote:
> "QuantumHED" <SithLordUS@peach.net> wrote...
>
>>first of all nintendo claimed some titles...there is no way anyone could
>>acheive the license for all those games.
>>
>>second, all of that is available right now on xbox.
>
>
> With or without a mod kit? I have an Xbox with Xbox live. I've never seen
> Super Mario available for it in any way, shape or form.
>
> Secondly, how do you *know* that Nintendo doesn't have the publishing rights
> to those games and can't re-release them? How do you know that Nintendo
> can't release the Namco library for the NES or the SNES? Or the Konami
> licenses for NES? I'd be willing to bet the farm that if Konami could make
> more money selling games they developed 20 years ago, they'd jump at the
> chance to license them *again* for more revenue.
>
> "No, we're not interested in making money."

Wait, we can finally make that game profitable? No, don't, don't give
us free money.

--
Rockboy
Everybody's all right
Everything is automatic
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.final-fantasy,alt.games.video.sony-playstation2,alt.games.video.xbox,rec.sport.pro-wrestling,rec.sport.football.college (More info?)

Krusty wrote:
> "NightSky 421" <nightsky421@yahoo.ca> wrote
>
>>I think stores will always do that to early adopters, but $500 is really
>>not
>>bad considering the hardware the Xbox 360 is packing. I know you couldn't
>>build a gaming PC for that amount of money unless you wanted something for
>>running software (decently) that is two years old or more. Still, I would
>>cool my heels for a while before dropping that kind of cash on a console
>>secure in the knowledge that it will soon drop below $400 once the initial
>>holiday wave is over. By then, more games will no doubt have made
>>themselves available.
>
>
> And let's not forget...the countless rubes that are running out *right now*
> and dropping that exact same amount on a Graphics Card just to play Doom 3.

Meanwhile Doom 3 on the XBox looks like ass compared to Doom 3 on my
computer.

--
Rockboy
Everybody's all right
Everything is automatic
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.final-fantasy,alt.games.video.sony-playstation2,alt.games.video.xbox,rec.sport.pro-wrestling,rec.sport.football.college (More info?)

Steve wrote:
> I have a GC and XBox now, and play the XBox about 5% of the time.
> I didn't really get into the online play like I thought I would (nothing
> but 14-year old retards yelling racial slurs at each other)

See Krusty, I told you.

--
Rockboy
Everybody's all right
Everything is automatic
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.final-fantasy,alt.games.video.sony-playstation2,alt.games.video.xbox,rec.sport.pro-wrestling,rec.sport.football.college (More info?)

"Rockboy" <rockboy@rockboy.net> wrote...
> Steve wrote:
>> I have a GC and XBox now, and play the XBox about 5% of the time. I
>> didn't really get into the online play like I thought I would (nothing
>> but 14-year old retards yelling racial slurs at each other)
>
> See Krusty, I told you.

Still doesn't really happen to me at all. I dunno, maybe it's just the
circle I play with. Or the games I play, or something. Or maybe I just have
a higher threshold for that stuff...IRC must've trained me to deal with
kooks...can't kook out and open #Halo2 (the deuce)...so you wind up dealing
with it better maybe...
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.sony-playstation2,alt.games.video.xbox (More info?)

In alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 Andrew Ryan Chang <archang@sfu.ca> wrote:
> Doug Jacobs <djacobs@shell.rawbw.com> wrote:
> >As both the PS1 and PS2 showed, it takes a good 12-18 months before you'll
> >start getting good games for the console to appear. However, during this

> And as the DC and XBox showed, you /can/ launch with a decent
> lineup.

DC didn't start getting any "must have" titles, in my opinion, until the
end of its first year. Unfortunatly, just when things started looking
interesting, Sega killed the console 🙁

XBox took even longer, especially since I wasn't going to pay more than
$20 for most of its titles.
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.sony-playstation2,alt.games.video.xbox (More info?)

Doug Jacobs <djacobs@shell.rawbw.com> wrote:
>In alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 Andrew Ryan Chang <archang@sfu.ca> wrote:
>> >As both the PS1 and PS2 showed, it takes a good 12-18 months before you'll
>> >start getting good games for the console to appear. However, during this
>
>> And as the DC and XBox showed, you /can/ launch with a decent
>> lineup.
>
>DC didn't start getting any "must have" titles, in my opinion, until the
>end of its first year. Unfortunatly, just when things started looking
>interesting, Sega killed the console 🙁

The launch lineup wasn't 100% gold like, say, Jet Grind Radio or
Skies of Arcadia. But Sonic Adventure, Powerstone, NFL2K, Soul Calibur,
House of the Dead ... that was a pretty decent initial lineup. We're not
exactly talking Fantavision-is-the-best-you've-got territory here.

--
Lisa: Mom, romance is dead. It was acquired in a hostile takeover by
Hallmark and Disney, homogenized, and sold off piece by piece.
-- No cynicism here, "Another Simpsons Clip Show"
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.final-fantasy,alt.games.video.sony-playstation2,alt.games.video.xbox,rec.sport.pro-wrestling,rec.sport.football.college (More info?)

In alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 Rob Browning <pluvius3@hotmail.com> wrote:

> >Why not? They're not that big...certainly not that big for high speed users.

> Because GC games are still being sold at retail.

Well, maybe the Revolution will be able to read GC discs? (why not, it's
just another laser assembly?)

> You don't think that Nintendo will actually _charge_ for this service,
> do you? Well, maybe it will; it's made a lot of dumb decisions in the
> past decade.

So, you're saying Nintendo won't charge for the download service? That'd
be silly. Why not hookup with Apple's iTunes and create iGames? 😉
Charging between $3-15 per game?
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.final-fantasy,alt.games.video.sony-playstation2,alt.games.video.xbox (More info?)

Doug Jacobs <djacobs@shell.rawbw.com> wrote:
>In alt.games.video.sony-playstation2 Rob Browning <pluvius3@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> >Why not? They're not that big...certainly not that big for high speed users.
>
>> Because GC games are still being sold at retail.
>
>Well, maybe the Revolution will be able to read GC discs? (why not, it's
>just another laser assembly?)

The Revolution can indeed read Revolution DVDs and GC discs. As
described, the slot loader can just easily accept both discs. Nice.

followups out to agff, which is the most relevant newsgroup here, not that
it's very relevant.

--
Lisa: Mom, romance is dead. It was acquired in a hostile takeover by
Hallmark and Disney, homogenized, and sold off piece by piece.
-- No cynicism here, "Another Simpsons Clip Show"
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.final-fantasy,alt.games.video.sony-playstation2,alt.games.video.xbox,rec.sport.pro-wrestling,rec.sport.football.college (More info?)

It will be the PS3 for me. In typical Microsoft fashion, they put
together a kludge of a next gen system with sketchy backwards
compatibility. I mean, it looks like they spent all of a day calling up
Dell to get the OK to white box their corp pc case. It looks exactly
like a Dell corporate PC. You can almost picture where the Dell badge
would go on the case. Unbelievable.

I think it's proof that Microsoft is still behind the curve in
understanding the console market.

Regards,
--
Matt Costanza
Austin, Tx USA



Freedom Fries wrote:

> Assuming you're not going to buy both which one are you going to buy? Early
> returns look good for the playstation3. Looks like it may actually be the
> better system for once. Looks like Sony's dominance for once will be
> warranted.
>
> PLAYSTATION 3
> --------------------------
>
> RSX (Reality Synthesizer) GPU has 512MB of graphics render memory
>
> 1080p native resolution
>
> two HD outputs
>
> seven Bluetooth controllers
>
> six USB slots, four up front and two in the back
>
> Bluray
>
> removable 2.5-in hard drive capability
>
> Wi-Fi connectivity with PSP used as a remote screen and/or controller
>
> wireless HD IP Camera with Minority Report-esque motion-sensing
> capabilities
>
>


--
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.final-fantasy,alt.games.video.sony-playstation2,alt.games.video.xbox,rec.sport.pro-wrestling,rec.sport.football.college (More info?)

"J." <jnafziger@NOSPAM.com> wrote
> It is a very intriguing development at any rate, and could be
> Nintendo's rebirth...

"rebirth"?

As Rockboy has pointed out, they're the 600 pound gorilla of video games. I
don't think you realize just how much money all those GB's/GBA's/DS's bring
in for them, as well as a licensed library that would make Sony blush. I
believe, for several months out of the previous years, the top selling
titles were Pokemon: Red, Pokemon: Blue, then Pokemon: Gold....then Pokemon:
Silver. If you look at financials, you'll discover that Nintendo makes
*boatloads* of money. More than Sony AND Microsoft. They routinely outsell
Sony and Microsoft in terms of units sold for software. By a *substantial*
margin.

The only misstep they've made in over 20 years was the cube, and you'd have
a tough time arguing that was a "failure". It just didn't sell as many as
Sony or Microsoft. They're still a *massively* successful
company...*massively*.

And it's almost a universally accepted truth that Myamoto is without a doubt
probably the greatest game developer in history. I think "rebirth" might be
overstating it...
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.final-fantasy,alt.games.video.sony-playstation2,alt.games.video.xbox,rec.sport.pro-wrestling,rec.sport.football.college (More info?)

"Krusty" <rspwkrusty@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:d6l9hb$btf$1@news3.infoave.net...
> "J." <jnafziger@NOSPAM.com> wrote
> > It is a very intriguing development at any rate, and could be
> > Nintendo's rebirth...
>
> "rebirth"?
>
> As Rockboy has pointed out, they're the 600 pound gorilla of video games.
I
> don't think you realize just how much money all those GB's/GBA's/DS's
bring
> in for them, as well as a licensed library that would make Sony blush. I
> believe, for several months out of the previous years, the top selling
> titles were Pokemon: Red, Pokemon: Blue, then Pokemon: Gold....then
Pokemon:
> Silver. If you look at financials, you'll discover that Nintendo makes
> *boatloads* of money. More than Sony AND Microsoft. They routinely outsell
> Sony and Microsoft in terms of units sold for software. By a *substantial*
> margin.
>
> The only misstep they've made in over 20 years was the cube, and you'd
have
> a tough time arguing that was a "failure". It just didn't sell as many as
> Sony or Microsoft. They're still a *massively* successful
> company...*massively*.
>
> And it's almost a universally accepted truth that Myamoto is without a
doubt
> probably the greatest game developer in history. I think "rebirth" might
be
> overstating it...
>
>

well, if we look at consoles only (everyone knows Nintendo is the king of
handhelds..... *why* is another matter entirely), nintendo has been steadily
losing overall market share since the N64 to new upstart companies who
didn't have any real experience in the console world. That, and that alone
is a surefire indication that they are on the way out, you dont need to look
at share prices to see it.
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.final-fantasy,alt.games.video.sony-playstation2,alt.games.video.xbox,rec.sport.pro-wrestling,rec.sport.football.college (More info?)

"Wurm" <a@b.c> wrote
> well, if we look at consoles only (everyone knows Nintendo is the king of
> handhelds..... *why* is another matter entirely),

If we're not going to look at "sony" with respect to "consoles only" or
Microsoft with respect to "consoles only" then I don't know why you'd choose
to do it with JUST Nintendo. Seems like you're skewing the numbers right out
of the gate. There was no reference made to "it could be Nintendo's rebirth
in the console area" merely a mention that hinted that somehow Nintendo was
on a decline.

> nintendo has been steadily
> losing overall market share since the N64 to new upstart companies who
> didn't have any real experience in the console world.

I don't know that I'd call Sony a "new upstart company" and I don't think
that "experience in the console world" has anything to do with it. Sega had
TONS of "experience in the console world" and they went belly up with their
console business. I think it simply was a series of unfortunate decisions
that they made while making several other key decisions in other areas that
maybe *weren't* so unfortunate (handhelds and game publishing & designing
immediately spring to mind). I think their unfortunate decisions counter
balance nicely with their successes. They easily develop the best *games* of
any development house out there, and as I said before, Myamoto is easily one
of the best game designers (if not *the* best) in the short history of
gaming.

And let's not forget that the Xbox is pretty much considered a failure in
Japan. Microsoft isn't even a blip over there. The whole world doesn't
revolve around Microsoft and Sony like it does in North America. Nintendo
*owns* Japan...just as much as Sony does.

> That, and that alone
> is a surefire indication that they are on the way out, you dont need to
> look
> at share prices to see it.

Well that's good because over the last two years, the share price has been
rising...so it's a good thing you didn't look at it, and in fact, it only
fell during the year and a half that the gamecube floundered.

They're nowhere near "on their way out". Just look at the excitement that
revolution is generating. People are talking about the power of the Sony
PS3, but now it's slowly creeping out that Blu-Ray DVD players are
*massively* expensive, and production of them might actually delay the
release of the PS3 by up to six months AND price it WAY out of the reach of
the average gamer. Likewise, after a whiz-bang launch on MTV, people are
starting to whisper that perhaps the Xbox360 might not be all about
that...the only company with consistently positive buzz coming out of E3
appears to be Nintendo. Their DS releases look terrific, the Revolution has
*everyone* talking about the potential for the Nintendo library of games,
and people are actually saying, "I didn't get a gamecube, but I'm sure gonna
get a revolution if you can play those games" and we already know it's 100%
backward compatible with Cube games because you'll be able to insert your
GameCube discs *into the unit* not to mention the backwards compatibility
with over 20 years of Nintendo's library, which companies like Namco and
Konami will be *all over* making money *again* on...

Like I said, I think the "hype" about Nintendo being "out" is really
that...just hype...and I'm certainly no Nintendo apologist...ask anyone, I'm
not one to go around banging the Nintendo drum, but you certainly can't
underestimate their ability to deliver fantastic products that people love
to play. They've been doing it for over 20 years...of all the companies
involved in Video Games, *they're* the ones who most directly speak to the
gamer in all of us.
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.final-fantasy,alt.games.video.sony-playstation2,alt.games.video.xbox,rec.sport.pro-wrestling,rec.sport.football.college (More info?)

"Rob Browning" <pluvius3@hotmail.com> wrote...
> On Fri, 20 May 2005 12:41:07 -0400, "Krusty" <rspwkrusty@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>>"Gold" service, which is basically just Xbox Live. Nobody sets up a
>>complex
>>network for online gameplay with content download and just gives it away,
>>that's ridiculous.
>
> You mean like Steam?

Do tell. I am intrigued by your ideas and wish to subscribe to your
newsletter.
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.final-fantasy,alt.games.video.sony-playstation2,alt.games.video.xbox,rec.sport.pro-wrestling,rec.sport.football.college (More info?)

"Rob Browning" <pluvius3@hotmail.com> wrote
> I don't expect many third parties to sign on with Nintendo concerning
> this unless Nintendo is going to charge an insane amount of money per
> game.

Justify that for me.

Seriously, because my thinking was, it would be a no-brainer. As in, Konami
already developed Contra, and all they have to do is simply make the
compiled game available for download. Basically charging money for something
that they have little to no overhead involved with providing.

It's not like they'd have to port anything, or recompile anything, or
recode, or really anything. If Nintendo's giving the revolution the ability
to play those games...all you have to do is provide them. No addiional work
would be necessary.
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.final-fantasy,alt.games.video.sony-playstation2,alt.games.video.xbox,rec.sport.pro-wrestling,rec.sport.football.college (More info?)

"Steve" <SteveSpamTrap@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3f0ppdF4mq4mU1@individual.net...
>and it seems like most games today are designed around
>younger kids that are able to play it 14 hours a day for a
>few weeks. I can't remember the last time I played a game
>all the way through to the end before getting burned out on
>it.
>

Maybe you haven't found the right genre. I like games with
varied play and a good story line, like Red Dead Revolver
(found that for $15 the other day, new.)
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.final-fantasy,alt.games.video.sony-playstation2,alt.games.video.xbox,rec.sport.pro-wrestling,rec.sport.football.college (More info?)

On Fri, 20 May 2005 14:16:15 -0400, "Krusty" <rspwkrusty@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>"J." <jnafziger@NOSPAM.com> wrote
>> It is a very intriguing development at any rate, and could be
>> Nintendo's rebirth...
>
>"rebirth"?
>
>As Rockboy has pointed out, they're the 600 pound gorilla of video games. I
>don't think you realize just how much money all those GB's/GBA's/DS's bring
>in for them, as well as a licensed library that would make Sony blush. I
>believe, for several months out of the previous years, the top selling
>titles were Pokemon: Red, Pokemon: Blue, then Pokemon: Gold....then Pokemon:
>Silver. If you look at financials, you'll discover that Nintendo makes
>*boatloads* of money. More than Sony AND Microsoft. They routinely outsell
>Sony and Microsoft in terms of units sold for software. By a *substantial*
>margin.
>
>The only misstep they've made in over 20 years was the cube, and you'd have
>a tough time arguing that was a "failure". It just didn't sell as many as
>Sony or Microsoft. They're still a *massively* successful
>company...*massively*.
>
>And it's almost a universally accepted truth that Myamoto is without a doubt
>probably the greatest game developer in history. I think "rebirth" might be
>overstating it...

Nintendo used to BE the home gaming industry. They may still make a
lot of money, but if you say "Nintendo" to kids today, you do not the
reaction you got from the name when I was a kid.

I believe that if Nintendo pulls this off just right, they will once
again become synonymous with home video games.

THAT is what I mean by rebirth.

Oh, and "almost universally accepted" and "without a doubt
probably..."? Man, say something like you mean it.

J.
-
Skinned Pig Football
www.skinnedpig.blogspot.com
Skinned Pig is spending the summer riding our new
motorcycles around in parking lots. See you in the
fall... maybe!
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.final-fantasy,alt.games.video.sony-playstation2,alt.games.video.xbox,rec.sport.pro-wrestling,rec.sport.football.college (More info?)

"J." <jnafziger@NOSPAM.com> wrote
> Oh, and "almost universally accepted" and "without a doubt
> probably..."? Man, say something like you mean it.

If you polled most gamers...besides that raving Final Fantasy fanboys and
the Sports Genre nerds, most people would rate Myamoto as the best game
designer ever.

"almost universally accepted"...and..."without a doubt probably" exactly as
I'd written it. I'm not about to try and second guess the mind of the
hardcore EA Madden dearest comrade, or the anime/FinalFantasy nerd. Those guys live in
their own little world.
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.final-fantasy,alt.games.video.sony-playstation2,alt.games.video.xbox,rec.sport.pro-wrestling,rec.sport.football.college (More info?)

Wurm wrote:
> "Krusty" <rspwkrusty@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:d6l9hb$btf$1@news3.infoave.net...
>> "J." <jnafziger@NOSPAM.com> wrote
>>> It is a very intriguing development at any rate, and could be
>>> Nintendo's rebirth...
>>
>> "rebirth"?
>>
>> As Rockboy has pointed out, they're the 600 pound gorilla of video
>> games. I don't think you realize just how much money all those
>> GB's/GBA's/DS's bring in for them, as well as a licensed library
>> that would make Sony blush. I believe, for several months out of the
>> previous years, the top selling titles were Pokemon: Red, Pokemon:
>> Blue, then Pokemon: Gold....then Pokemon: Silver. If you look at
>> financials, you'll discover that Nintendo makes *boatloads* of
>> money. More than Sony AND Microsoft. They routinely outsell Sony and
>> Microsoft in terms of units sold for software. By a *substantial*
>> margin.
>>
>> The only misstep they've made in over 20 years was the cube, and
>> you'd have a tough time arguing that was a "failure". It just didn't
>> sell as many as Sony or Microsoft. They're still a *massively*
>> successful company...*massively*.
>>
>> And it's almost a universally accepted truth that Myamoto is without
>> a doubt probably the greatest game developer in history. I think
>> "rebirth" might be overstating it...
>>
>>
>
> well, if we look at consoles only (everyone knows Nintendo is the
> king of handhelds..... *why* is another matter entirely), nintendo
> has been steadily losing overall market share since the N64 to new
> upstart companies who didn't have any real experience in the console
> world. That, and that alone is a surefire indication that they are on
> the way out, you dont need to look at share prices to see it.

Upstart companies? I wouldn't call microsoft and sony upstart. They have
the money and resources to under price their systems. Not to mention the
money to buy off third party softwear companies.

Ryan
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.final-fantasy,alt.games.video.sony-playstation2,alt.games.video.xbox,rec.sport.pro-wrestling,rec.sport.football.college (More info?)

"Rob Browning" <pluvius3@hotmail.com> wrote
> nonexistent cost of porting and
> packaging?

You haven't worked in packaging lately have you? Packaging is *outrageous*.
Paper products cost a fortune. Same with plastics.

Think free distribution on games that are already compiled, and I'm thinking
pure profit with no work. Like I said, a no-brainer.
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.final-fantasy,alt.games.video.sony-playstation2,alt.games.video.xbox,rec.sport.pro-wrestling,rec.sport.football.college (More info?)

"Rob Browning" <pluvius3@hotmail.com> wrote
> Of course, it doesn't help that Nintendo has said hardly anything
> about the Revolution in comparison to what MS and Sony have said about
> their consoles, probably because the Revolution isn't slated to come
> out until mid-2006 (a really bad decision, might I add).

I'll be mildly shocked if Sony ships the PS3 within 3 months of their target
date and I'd be willing to wager the window between the PS3 and the
Revolution will be a LOT smaller than people think. I don't think Sony
stands a chinaman's chance of getting enough Blu Ray DVD drives...
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.final-fantasy,alt.games.video.sony-playstation2,alt.games.video.xbox,rec.sport.pro-wrestling,rec.sport.football.college (More info?)

Krusty wrote:
> "Rob Browning" <pluvius3@hotmail.com> wrote
>> Of course, it doesn't help that Nintendo has said hardly anything
>> about the Revolution in comparison to what MS and Sony have said
>> about their consoles, probably because the Revolution isn't slated
>> to come out until mid-2006 (a really bad decision, might I add).
>
> I'll be mildly shocked if Sony ships the PS3 within 3 months of their
> target date and I'd be willing to wager the window between the PS3
> and the Revolution will be a LOT smaller than people think. I don't
> think Sony stands a chinaman's chance of getting enough Blu Ray DVD
> drives...

It's suppose to be the size of a dvd drive for your computer. It's suppose
to be able to fit inside your computer and hook directly to your computer
monitor.

Ryan