XBox 360 won't support HDMI or DVI :-(

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.xbox (More info?)

On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 14:58:23 GMT, theOne <abuse@prodigy.net> Gave us:

>pole smoker indeed :)

Are you looking in a mirror, asswipe? Speak for yourself as your
powers of assessment rank somewhere well below E-1 grade baby
bullshit, as did his.
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.xbox (More info?)

On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 11:35:02 -0600, "Ron Mexico"
<Estoscacahuates@comcast.net> Gave us:

> My wife couldn't tell the difference but to me that is just proof
>that 1) Women don't get it and 2) Lasik surgery is overrated.

So is your IQ.

Plenty of women "get it", just not that thing you married,
apparently. Bwuahahahaha...
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.xbox (More info?)

On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 18:54:06 GMT, theOne <abuse@prodigy.net> Gave us:

>Eras wrote:
>> "theOne" wrote in message
>>
>>
>>>that HDMI. Although, how would you get the audio portion on the DVI end?
>>
>>
>> I'm pulling the video from my cable (HD) STB to my HDTV through DVI-HDMI.
>> Sound is coming (fiber) from the STB to a DD/DTS receiver. As this is how
>> most people are set up, I don't see the "benefit" of a combined video/audio
>> feed. Even if the cable STB had HDMI out instead of DVI, I'd still be using
>> fiber to get the audio to the DD/DTS receiver..
>>

>i feel ya, but to me, that defeats the purpose of HDMI.

Are you saying that the optical link is poorer quality?
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.xbox (More info?)

TokaMundo wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 14:58:23 GMT, theOne <abuse@prodigy.net> Gave us:
>
>
>>pole smoker indeed :)
>
>
> Are you looking in a mirror, asswipe? Speak for yourself as your
> powers of assessment rank somewhere well below E-1 grade baby
> bullshit, as did his.


righty-o gunny :) A-TTEN.....TION! Veteran E-5, presiding :)
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.xbox (More info?)

TokaMundo wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 11:35:02 -0600, "Ron Mexico"
> <Estoscacahuates@comcast.net> Gave us:
>
>
>>My wife couldn't tell the difference but to me that is just proof
>>that 1) Women don't get it and 2) Lasik surgery is overrated.
>
>
> So is your IQ.
>
> Plenty of women "get it", just not that thing you married,
> apparently. Bwuahahahaha...


damn Ron, you're going to have to pick up some extra strength RAID
tonight on your way home. This roach means business.
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.xbox (More info?)

TokaMundo wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 18:54:06 GMT, theOne <abuse@prodigy.net> Gave us:
>
>
>>Eras wrote:
>>
>>>"theOne" wrote in message
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>that HDMI. Although, how would you get the audio portion on the DVI end?
>>>
>>>
>>>I'm pulling the video from my cable (HD) STB to my HDTV through DVI-HDMI.
>>>Sound is coming (fiber) from the STB to a DD/DTS receiver. As this is how
>>>most people are set up, I don't see the "benefit" of a combined video/audio
>>>feed. Even if the cable STB had HDMI out instead of DVI, I'd still be using
>>>fiber to get the audio to the DD/DTS receiver..
>>>
>
>
>>i feel ya, but to me, that defeats the purpose of HDMI.
>
>
> Are you saying that the optical link is poorer quality?

Of course not. I'm saying its unecessary extra clutter and negates the
dual functionality of HDMI (to me). As you've said to certain others,
"Apply a little bit of common sense before responding".
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.xbox (More info?)

On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 00:32:23 GMT, theOne <abuse@prodigy.net> Gave us:

>TokaMundo wrote:
>> On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 14:58:23 GMT, theOne <abuse@prodigy.net> Gave us:
>>
>>
>>>pole smoker indeed :)
>>
>>
>> Are you looking in a mirror, asswipe? Speak for yourself as your
>> powers of assessment rank somewhere well below E-1 grade baby
>> bullshit, as did his.
>
>
>righty-o gunny :) A-TTEN.....TION! Veteran E-5, presiding :)


I told you what you RATE with that behavior, not what some other
idiot allowed you to attain while you were in service... Big
difference.
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.xbox (More info?)

TokaMundo wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 00:32:23 GMT, theOne <abuse@prodigy.net> Gave us:
>
>
>>TokaMundo wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 14:58:23 GMT, theOne <abuse@prodigy.net> Gave us:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>pole smoker indeed :)
>>>
>>>
>>> Are you looking in a mirror, asswipe? Speak for yourself as your
>>>powers of assessment rank somewhere well below E-1 grade baby
>>>bullshit, as did his.
>>
>>
>>righty-o gunny :) A-TTEN.....TION! Veteran E-5, presiding :)
>
>
>
> I told you what you RATE with that behavior, not what some other
> idiot allowed you to attain while you were in service... Big
> difference.


dude, you're such a dork.
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.xbox (More info?)

> Again with the nil value assessments. Who died, and left your lame
> ass the great assessor?


is you job title assessment assessor?LOL~ Where do you people come from?
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.xbox (More info?)

On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 00:46:16 GMT, theOne <abuse@prodigy.net> Gave us:

>TokaMundo wrote:
>> On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 18:54:06 GMT, theOne <abuse@prodigy.net> Gave us:
>>
>>
>>>Eras wrote:
>>>
>>>>"theOne" wrote in message
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>that HDMI. Although, how would you get the audio portion on the DVI end?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I'm pulling the video from my cable (HD) STB to my HDTV through DVI-HDMI.
>>>>Sound is coming (fiber) from the STB to a DD/DTS receiver. As this is how
>>>>most people are set up, I don't see the "benefit" of a combined video/audio
>>>>feed. Even if the cable STB had HDMI out instead of DVI, I'd still be using
>>>>fiber to get the audio to the DD/DTS receiver..
>>>>
>>
>>
>>>i feel ya, but to me, that defeats the purpose of HDMI.
>>
>>
>> Are you saying that the optical link is poorer quality?
>
>Of course not. I'm saying its unecessary extra clutter and negates the
>dual functionality of HDMI (to me). As you've said to certain others,
>"Apply a little bit of common sense before responding".

Clutter? You think that one more connector "cord" between two
devices is gonna matter at this point in a system?

USE SOME COMMON SENSE, BOY.

The word for today is LAYER.

DTS optical out comes right off the stream. How many layers of
hardware are there AFTER the DVD pickup head, and your newfangled HDMI
interface?

Or do you even know?
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.xbox (More info?)

"TokaMundo" <TokaMundo@weedizgood.org> wrote in message
news:0gj6c152kq8cuak11sr42vlqrhn62t4tnn@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 00:46:16 GMT, theOne <abuse@prodigy.net> Gave us:
>
>>TokaMundo wrote:
>>> On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 18:54:06 GMT, theOne <abuse@prodigy.net> Gave us:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Eras wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"theOne" wrote in message
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>that HDMI. Although, how would you get the audio portion on the DVI
>>>>>>end?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I'm pulling the video from my cable (HD) STB to my HDTV through
>>>>>DVI-HDMI.
>>>>>Sound is coming (fiber) from the STB to a DD/DTS receiver. As this is
>>>>>how
>>>>>most people are set up, I don't see the "benefit" of a combined
>>>>>video/audio
>>>>>feed. Even if the cable STB had HDMI out instead of DVI, I'd still be
>>>>>using
>>>>>fiber to get the audio to the DD/DTS receiver..
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>i feel ya, but to me, that defeats the purpose of HDMI.
>>>
>>>
>>> Are you saying that the optical link is poorer quality?
>>
>>Of course not. I'm saying its unecessary extra clutter and negates the
>>dual functionality of HDMI (to me). As you've said to certain others,
>>"Apply a little bit of common sense before responding".
>
> Clutter? You think that one more connector "cord" between two
> devices is gonna matter at this point in a system?
>
> USE SOME COMMON SENSE, BOY.
>
> The word for today is LAYER.
>
> DTS optical out comes right off the stream. How many layers of
> hardware are there AFTER the DVD pickup head, and your newfangled HDMI
> interface?
>
> Or do you even know?

I know your newsgroup name should be Erection because you just become a
bigger and bigger dick every time you post.
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.xbox (More info?)

On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 01:41:26 GMT, theOne <abuse@prodigy.net> Gave us:

>TokaMundo wrote:
>> On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 00:32:23 GMT, theOne <abuse@prodigy.net> Gave us:
>>
>>
>>>TokaMundo wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 14:58:23 GMT, theOne <abuse@prodigy.net> Gave us:
>>>>
>>>>>pole smoker indeed :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Are you looking in a mirror, asswipe? Speak for yourself as your
>>>>powers of assessment rank somewhere well below E-1 grade baby
>>>>bullshit, as did his.
>>>
>>>
>>>righty-o gunny :) A-TTEN.....TION! Veteran E-5, presiding :)
>>
>>
>> I told you what you RATE with that behavior, not what some other
>> idiot allowed you to attain while you were in service... Big
>> difference.
>
>
>dude, you're such a dork.

And you're a goddamned E-1 grade Retard!
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.xbox (More info?)

On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 20:52:51 -0600, "Ron Mexico"
<Estoscacahuates@comcast.net> Gave us:

>
>All I said was, take the dick out of your mouth and I could understand you
>at normal speed.
>
Could you be any more like a little 12 year old twit?
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.xbox (More info?)

On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 20:52:51 -0600, "Ron Mexico"
<Estoscacahuates@comcast.net> Gave us:

>Wawawawawawa. Sorry, I couldn't hear you because that guys pelvis was
>blocking your face.

Is this how you always react when someone tells you that you are
stupid by stating that you should use a little common sense?

Are you the same mentality twit that can't have a debate with
someone without claiming to have been "dissed"?

You, and your gang boy mentality is about as retarded as it gets.
You prove it more with every post you make.

You SHOULD be dissed, dipshit.
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.xbox (More info?)

On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 20:52:51 -0600, "Ron Mexico"
<Estoscacahuates@comcast.net> Gave us:

>
>Nice grammar, ass wipe. Once again, it is you who needs to grow up.
>
Right... As if a 40 IQ, gang boy retard like you could expound
on grammar... asswipe.
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.xbox (More info?)

On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 20:57:24 -0600, "Ron Mexico"
<Estoscacahuates@comcast.net> Gave us:

>
>I know your newsgroup name should be Erection because you just become a
>bigger and bigger dick every time you post.
>

Yep... looks like your knowledge is way up there... Not!

Did you pay for your x-box with your meth sales money, punk boy?
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.xbox (More info?)

TokaMundo wrote:

> My God! The retard speweth forth with the gang boy retard lingo!
>
> Go ahead, idiot... make a fool of your "bitch ass self".
>
> Bwuhahahahaa...
>

This just says everything we need to know about you doesn't it?

Gang boy retard lingo and bitch ass self. Wow, you are truly the epitome
of mature and reasoned logic in this whole thread aren't you? How about
walking the walk for a second? In fact, your whole time here (in this
group) has been spent jerking your cock with one hit lines and frivolous
put downs. But nobody has really paid any attention to you..... Until
now. You must feel really special. For you, its as close to a friend as
you'll ever get :)



>
>
> As I stated before, wussy boy... YOUR numerical age did not make
> YOU a man. Every post you makes goes further and further to prove it.

I can certainly tell this is the case by your numerous and quite winded
replies. All you need is a leash dog boy.
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.xbox (More info?)

TokaMundo wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 20:52:51 -0600, "Ron Mexico"
> <Estoscacahuates@comcast.net> Gave us:
>
>
>>Nice grammar, ass wipe. Once again, it is you who needs to grow up.
>>
>
> Right... As if a 40 IQ, gang boy retard like you could expound
> on grammar... asswipe.


were all these separate replies REALLY necessary to illustrate your
rebuttal?
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.xbox (More info?)

>
>
> Clutter? You think that one more connector "cord" between two
> devices is gonna matter at this point in a system?
>

secondly, even if HDMI were just a video cord, I'd still pick it first.
Why? Do you really need that answered or are you going to get all helmet
head if I tell ya. DVI: Pain in the ass to connect, to obtrusive, and
too many pins. HDMI is as simple as USB.You see, we're already at the
pinnacle of quality so its about design. On that note, its like
comparing a parallel and firewire cable; which would you rather deal with?

Look man, I know the deal. You bought a HDTV while it was still all
hype. Now you're stuck with a set that has interfaces that will sooner
than later be eclipsed. So you feel a compulsive need to stand up for
your tv and spout all this foolish rubric about how you int. is the
coolest and the newest and nothing is better. But technology moves
ahead; I'm sorry 🙁 Its really not my fault; its popularity speaks for
itself with no intervention from me.
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.xbox (More info?)

"theOne"wrote in message

> i feel ya, but to me, that defeats the purpose of HDMI.

Don't get me wrong, I'm all about simplicity. The back of my entertainment
center (HDTV/STB/DVD/receiver/consoles/modem/router/etc) looks like a mad
scientist experiment with component cables, fiber, RCA, CAT5, speaker wire,
etc going in all different directions. Tie-wraps only go so far in keeping
everything "neat".

What I'm getting at (as others as well) is that most people want their video
going straight into their (HD)TV while the audio goes into whatever device
they use for DD/DTS encoding and speaker feeding. If you only use the
speakers built into your (HD)TV, then one simple HDMI connection for video
and sound is great -- but, otherwise, its not of much benefit.

Another thing with the audio in HDMI: you are aware that the majority of
devices that have HDMI out carry the audio as DD 2.0 and not DD 5.1?

Cheers,
-E
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.xbox (More info?)

Eras wrote:
> "theOne"wrote in message
>
>
>>i feel ya, but to me, that defeats the purpose of HDMI.
>
>
> Don't get me wrong, I'm all about simplicity. The back of my entertainment
> center (HDTV/STB/DVD/receiver/consoles/modem/router/etc) looks like a mad
> scientist experiment with component cables, fiber, RCA, CAT5, speaker wire,
> etc going in all different directions. Tie-wraps only go so far in keeping
> everything "neat".
>
> What I'm getting at (as others as well) is that most people want their video
> going straight into their (HD)TV while the audio goes into whatever device
> they use for DD/DTS encoding and speaker feeding. If you only use the
> speakers built into your (HD)TV, then one simple HDMI connection for video
> and sound is great -- but, otherwise, its not of much benefit.

I'm sure (and hopeful) newer recievers hitting the market very shortly
will remedy this shortfall. Certainly there is a demand for it. BTW, my
original post wasn't meant to shortchange your current solution. I
understand its the most feasible atm, but to me, I'm optimistic of
what's to come.
>
> Another thing with the audio in HDMI: you are aware that the majority of
> devices that have HDMI out carry the audio as DD 2.0 and not DD 5.1?

Yes, DVD-audio was released with the 1.1 spec I believe. Since HDMI was
originally incepted to support 8 channels and can support an incredible
amount of bandwidth, you'll certainly see more support in months to come
(right in time for my upgrade)!

Here's a snip from hdmi.org

......The fact that the vast majority of HDMI products shipped are
two-channel TVs that don’t support more than two-channel audio doesn’t
make this any less the case. Most existing HDMI sources can output any
compressed stream, and the newer sources can output uncompressed
6-channel, 96kHz audio from a DVD-Audio disk. There are several A/V
receivers on the market that can accept and process the 6- or 8-channel
audio from HDMI and more are expected to be available shortly.......
> Cheers,
> -E
>
>
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.xbox (More info?)

On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 06:06:18 GMT, theOne <abuse@prodigy.net> Gave us:

> Wow, you are truly the epitome
>of mature and reasoned logic in this whole thread aren't you?


Dumbshit "bitch ass self" was quoted and "gang boy lingo" is what
"bitch ass self" is.

The person that spewed that baby bullshit remark is the one that is
in question here... Oh, that's right... it's YOU.
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.xbox (More info?)

On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 06:40:16 GMT, theOne <abuse@prodigy.net> Gave us:

>
>were all these separate replies REALLY necessary to illustrate your
>rebuttal?

Still... nothing to do with grammar, dipshit. Your first attack was
stupid... your subsequent attacks are as well.

Get off it, dipshit.
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.xbox (More info?)

On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 06:50:17 GMT, theOne <abuse@prodigy.net> Gave us:

>
>>
>>
>> Clutter? You think that one more connector "cord" between two
>> devices is gonna matter at this point in a system?
>>
>
>secondly, even if HDMI were just a video cord, I'd still pick it first.
>Why? Do you really need that answered or are you going to get all helmet
>head if I tell ya. DVI: Pain in the ass to connect, to obtrusive, and
>too many pins. HDMI is as simple as USB.You see, we're already at the
>pinnacle of quality so its about design. On that note, its like
>comparing a parallel and firewire cable; which would you rather deal with?

You're an idiot. DVI is the best way to pass RGB component signals.

You are right about one thing. It's apples and oranges.
>
>Look man, I know the deal.

You don't "know" a damned thing.

> You bought a HDTV while it was still all
>hype.

This baby bullshit remark proves it.

> Now you're stuck with a set that has interfaces that will sooner
>than later be eclipsed.

You're an idiot.

> So you feel a compulsive need to stand up for
>your tv and spout all this foolish rubric about how you int. is the
>coolest and the newest and nothing is better.

I never said that.. ever, retard boy.

Get a clue. All I said was that pissing and moaning about a
separate audio cable is childish, at best.

> But technology moves
>ahead;

Duh.

> I'm sorry

Yes... you are.

> 🙁 Its really not my fault;

Even if you worked in the industry, you would still have had nothing
to do with it, dufus, so it could never be your fault.

> its popularity speaks for
>itself with no intervention from me.

Nobody made a popularity comparison in this thread. Why don't you
up your meds, and try reading it again.
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.video.xbox (More info?)

TokaMundo wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 06:06:18 GMT, theOne <abuse@prodigy.net> Gave us:
>
>
>>Wow, you are truly the epitome
>>of mature and reasoned logic in this whole thread aren't you?
>
>
>
> Dumbshit "bitch ass self" was quoted and "gang boy lingo" is what
> "bitch ass self" is.
>
> The person that spewed that baby bullshit remark is the one that is
> in question here... Oh, that's right... it's YOU.

umm..Guess again....I'm not in question.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom