Archived from groups: alt.games.video.xbox (More info?)
TokaMundo wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 06:50:17 GMT, theOne <abuse@prodigy.net> Gave us:
>
>
>>>
>>> Clutter? You think that one more connector "cord" between two
>>>devices is gonna matter at this point in a system?
>>>
>>
>>secondly, even if HDMI were just a video cord, I'd still pick it first.
>>Why? Do you really need that answered or are you going to get all helmet
>>head if I tell ya. DVI: Pain in the ass to connect, to obtrusive, and
>>too many pins. HDMI is as simple as USB.You see, we're already at the
>>pinnacle of quality so its about design. On that note, its like
>>comparing a parallel and firewire cable; which would you rather deal with?
>
>
> You're an idiot. DVI is the best way to pass RGB component signals.
ohh, i didn't realize. Does it have a special way of sending the ones
and zeros? How about 5Gbps throughput?
>
> You are right about one thing. It's apples and oranges.
>
>>Look man, I know the deal.
>
>
> You don't "know" a damned thing.
>
>
>>You bought a HDTV while it was still all
>>hype.
>
>
> This baby bullshit remark proves it.
>
>
>>Now you're stuck with a set that has interfaces that will sooner
>>than later be eclipsed.
>
>
> You're an idiot.
k
>
>
>>So you feel a compulsive need to stand up for
>>your tv and spout all this foolish rubric about how you int. is the
>>coolest and the newest and nothing is better.
>
>
> I never said that.. ever, retard boy.
didn't need too, verbatim.
>
> Get a clue. All I said was that pissing and moaning about a
> separate audio cable is childish, at best.
uhhh..no you didn't and I wasn't pissing and moaning about anything.
Remember, it was you who started this particular flame. We're of a level
mind; obviously you are not.
>
>>But technology moves
>>ahead;
>
>
> Duh.
>
>
>>I'm sorry
>
>
> Yes... you are.
>
>
>😡 Its really not my fault;
>
>
> Even if you worked in the industry, you would still have had nothing
> to do with it, dufus, so it could never be your fault.
I do, and it beats what you do for a living, I assure you
>
>>its popularity speaks for
>>itself with no intervention from me.
>
>
> Nobody made a popularity comparison in this thread. Why don't you
> up your meds, and try reading it again.
your whole time here is spent with insults and denial. Get a clue skippy.
TokaMundo wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 06:50:17 GMT, theOne <abuse@prodigy.net> Gave us:
>
>
>>>
>>> Clutter? You think that one more connector "cord" between two
>>>devices is gonna matter at this point in a system?
>>>
>>
>>secondly, even if HDMI were just a video cord, I'd still pick it first.
>>Why? Do you really need that answered or are you going to get all helmet
>>head if I tell ya. DVI: Pain in the ass to connect, to obtrusive, and
>>too many pins. HDMI is as simple as USB.You see, we're already at the
>>pinnacle of quality so its about design. On that note, its like
>>comparing a parallel and firewire cable; which would you rather deal with?
>
>
> You're an idiot. DVI is the best way to pass RGB component signals.
ohh, i didn't realize. Does it have a special way of sending the ones
and zeros? How about 5Gbps throughput?
>
> You are right about one thing. It's apples and oranges.
>
>>Look man, I know the deal.
>
>
> You don't "know" a damned thing.
>
>
>>You bought a HDTV while it was still all
>>hype.
>
>
> This baby bullshit remark proves it.
>
>
>>Now you're stuck with a set that has interfaces that will sooner
>>than later be eclipsed.
>
>
> You're an idiot.
k
>
>
>>So you feel a compulsive need to stand up for
>>your tv and spout all this foolish rubric about how you int. is the
>>coolest and the newest and nothing is better.
>
>
> I never said that.. ever, retard boy.
didn't need too, verbatim.
>
> Get a clue. All I said was that pissing and moaning about a
> separate audio cable is childish, at best.
uhhh..no you didn't and I wasn't pissing and moaning about anything.
Remember, it was you who started this particular flame. We're of a level
mind; obviously you are not.
>
>>But technology moves
>>ahead;
>
>
> Duh.
>
>
>>I'm sorry
>
>
> Yes... you are.
>
>
>😡 Its really not my fault;
>
>
> Even if you worked in the industry, you would still have had nothing
> to do with it, dufus, so it could never be your fault.
I do, and it beats what you do for a living, I assure you
>
>>its popularity speaks for
>>itself with no intervention from me.
>
>
> Nobody made a popularity comparison in this thread. Why don't you
> up your meds, and try reading it again.
your whole time here is spent with insults and denial. Get a clue skippy.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram