Hi, mrmonsoon ...
Re-read the original post again, if you will.
The user made a couple of mistakes. Let's break this down, if you don't mind.
First ...
I learned the hard way that I can't use a DOS boot disk to FDISK then format the HD, because xp won't see it.
Which isn't true. If the partition is valid, and correctly formatted, the WinXP disk should have no difficulty with the partition detection. I can think of no particular reason why WinXP can't be installed in a normal primary DOS partition made with FDISK, as long as it is under 137GB ... when the 48-bit logical block addressing issue comes into play.
Then ...
I boot off the XP CD. I agree to the sign your first born and all life to Bill aggrement.Known to some as F8.
I get to the option where I should be able to choose which filesystem I want to format with an I only get a NTFS option. No FAT choice. And I have no clue as to why?
The PC was already NTFS, but that should not make any difference at this point in the setup should it?
Obviously, the user really wasn't paying that much attention to the set up, and missed the point where the partition could be deleted, and a new one created.
To my way of thinking, this means the only partition currently on the disk was NTFS ... and if it was 137GB or better, there would be no option for FAT or FAT32.
The two more remote possibilities could be that no partition was detected, or the current partition information was invalid ... again, forcing Windows to be installed in a new, single, large partition, due to lack of user intervention during the process.
Klutz said ...
You can't format a NTFS partition with FAT.
Of course, Klutz is right; you can't format an NTFS partition with FAT. The only option if a FAT file system is desired would be to either delete the partition and start over, or use a third-party tool on a boot disk to change the file system.
However, you said ...
A NTFS partion won't see FAT (File Allocation Table).
Sorry, sir ... that's not only not true, but it's a weird statement, if you give it some thought. It's not the file system that determines what kind of partitions are "visible", so to speak, whether from the command line, or from within a GUI.
Two examples. Lets say the disk had two partitions, with one being NTFS, and the other FAT16. Windows NT 4.0 is installed in a 2GB FAT16 partition. Are both partitions visible from within the GUI? Yes ... because the operating system supports both kind of file systems.
Now ... lets assume the disk has a single NTFS 5 partition. The system is booted with a Win98 boot disk. Is the partition visible?
Yes.
It will show up as being a non-DOS partition. Occasionally, with older versions of FDISK, it could be misidentified as an HPFS partition, with read-only access.
Now ... here's the important question: can FDISK delete a non-DOS partition?
Yes. This option is available, as shown on this <A HREF="http://web.uflib.ufl.edu/libsys/mmm/multi.htm" target="_new">page</A>.
I also wish to make this clear ... any Windows operating system meant for home use that supports NTFS can also see and use a FAT32 or FAT16 partition.
The only truly important aspect of this entire endeavor is that DOS cannot create or format a NTFS partition, and that WinXP cannot re-format an NTFS partition as FAT or FAT32 which seems to be what everyone was attempting to say, in a circuitous manner, of sorts. At least, that's what appears to be happening in the thread.
The type of partition that should be created is entirely dependent on what the <i>operating system environment</i> can use and support.
I hope you understand, this post is just about clarity, and nothing against <i>anyone's</i> intelligence. If it so happens that my original post was over the user's head, I'll just go right on and apologize for being obtuse, although if the user clicked on the links I provided, everything should have been made clear, with only a few minutes of study ... which really is my point. Education is more important than just explaining something, bit by bit, as if the user is incapable of rational, constructive thought.
If the latter is the case, then nothing either you OR I can say is going to make difference. That's just beating a dead horse for refusing to drink. Some things are just a waste of time and energy.
In the interests of science, here's a chart you might find useful:
<A HREF="http://www.pcguide.com/ref/hdd/file/cross.htm" target="_new">PC Operating System and File System Cross-Reference</A>
And another link, just to complete the preceding information: <A HREF="http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q310561" target="_new">q310561</A>
Later ...
Toey
<A HREF="http://forums.btvillarin.com/index.php?act=ST&f=41&t=328&s=91c282f2e5207e99b7a652ee13b3512a" target="_new"><font color=green>My System Rigs</font color=green></A>
_______________________________________________
<A HREF="http://forums.btvillarin.com/" target="_new"><b><font color=purple>BTVILLARIN.com</font color=purple></b></A> - <i><font color=orange>Your Computer Questions Answered</font color=orange></i>