Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (
More info?)
One additonal point - kind of a 2.1
There will not be an upgrade path as the release of the final product will
be an OEM release only and as such can only be installed to a clean hard
drive, there is no upgrade option.
--
Regards,
Mike
--
Mike Brannigan [Microsoft]
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights
Please note I cannot respond to e-mailed questions, please use these
newsgroups
"Miss Perspicacia Tick" <misstick@lancre.dw> wrote in message
news:6fwTc.31484$Dz3.11529@fe48.usenetserver.com...
> Jim D wrote:
>> I have recently upgraded to an AMD64 processor and im
>> still running XP Pro. Would there be any advantage in my
>> upgrading to the 64bit version?
>
>
> 1) There is no such thing as a 64-bit version - it is still beta
> 2) When it is finally released, I doubt very much whether there would
> be
> an upgrade path as it would be Pro to Pro (someone correct me if I'm wrong
> but AFAIK there will be no 64-bit Home version). You cannot upgrade Pro to
> Pro, it would require a clean installation.
> 3) As to whether you'd see any advantage, it would be debatable as
> you'd
> still be running 32-bit applications - raw OS tasks would be faster, as
> the
> OS would be able to take advantage of the 64-bit CPU, but applications
> would
> still be curtailed.
> 4) This is probably the most important point of all, as the OS is still
> beta, there are few drivers available (and those that do exist are still
> beta themselves). You *CANNOT* use 32-bit drivers under a 64-bit OS, just
> as
> the reverse is also true.
> 5) As the OS is still beta, if you do decide to download and install it
> please bear in mind that it is beta and, as such, installation as the sole
> OS on a production system is *NOT* to be recommended. If you must install
> it, I strongly recommend do so in a dual boot situation.
>
> --
> My great-grandfather was born and raised in Elgin - did he eventually
> lose his marbles?
>
>
>