xpPhone: The Smartphone That Runs Windows XP

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.
[citation][nom]marcus_br[/nom]For starters, it can have EVERYTHING the others have and then some.What do you need?In Windows, you can EASILY get.Heck, you can even create applications for it so easily...I'm not sure on the other phones complexity, but what about office/groove?Scheduled tasks?[/citation]
Office? OpenOffice.org works most of the time and it's cross-platform, there's even an ARM port for most Linux distros and internet tablets like Nokia's. In fact for work processing of Word docs you can even use Abiword, which runs much lighter. Those can work on existing or near-future smartphones that already have lower power consumption and don't need the cruft of x86 architecture. Groove? There are lots of other collaborative programs either out in the wild or in the works, some of which work purely in a browser so they aren't tied to Windows and Office.

It's not just about there being alternatives right now, though, how many people need this stuff on their smartphones? Right now, none: no smartphone runs XP. In fact I'd like to see that continue for a while because it'll breed a diversity of similar efforts that are either going to be cross-platform (good), interoperable between each other (great!), or just plain tailored for the limitations of spartphones like tiny screens, weak processors, and low RAM. I'd rather see a bit more innovation in the software space than rely on the old XP OS and hardware to get things done.
 
XP recommended hardware: a Pentium/K6 300MHz, 128 MB RAM, 1.5 GB HDD
Don't think we'll have a problem with slow and clunky
 
I would definately be interested, IF the price and performance were there. I would love to see more on this phone, I wouldn't care if it were a little bigger then an iPhone as I am sure it would blow away the performace of it.
 
[citation][nom]zelog[/nom]XP recommended hardware: a Pentium/K6 300MHz, 128 MB RAM, 1.5 GB HDDDon't think we'll have a problem with slow and clunky[/citation]
I've used XP for years with a 1.7GHz Pentium 4 and 128MB. I turned down the visual eye candy and banhammer'd unnecessary startup processes. It was pretty slow and clunky even after a fresh install, and especially as time wore on.
 
Probably running a Z series Atom, ultra slow,and low on battery life, as is expected from a heavy OS for cellphones, like Windows XP.
I bet it even will have difficulty running a game in Dosbox.

Now, why run Dosbox. You would be running the whole eXPerience that makes XP so good just to run an inefficient dos emulator on top of it. Running games in DOS, that's a different question.
 
[citation][nom]hellwig[/nom]Hard to be interested without more specs. What is it running, Intel Atom I assume. [/citation]

I doubt that AMD mobile processor is codeword for Intel Atom.
 
[citation][nom]leo2kp[/nom]With Windows 7 battery life I wish Microsoft would make an "ultra lite" version of 7 that would run on a phone like this, maybe even the netbook version would run on it.[/citation]

What they should have done was to make one OS that scales from smartphones to desktops.
 
I would love it as long as it's not slow. I have been running WM PocketPC(HTC 8525, Att tilt, and now the Fuse) for the last 4yrs and I would have no problem jumping to this one. Please more specs and will it be GSM?
 
Touchpad!? That's idiotic if you have a touch screen.

This will likely be slow, buggy, and last about 2 hours at best before having to be plugged in.

On another note... why even bother? A crappy XP system will be far less useful than a quick, optimized OS made for a handset.
 
[citation][nom]pocketdrummer[/nom]Touchpad!? That's idiotic if you have a touch screen.[/citation]
True...
And a battery would be stupid if you had an onboard nuclear power plant... But you don't.
Any more hypothetical stupidities you want to rant about?

[citation][nom]pocketdrummer[/nom]This will likely be slow, buggy, and last about 2 hours at best before having to be plugged in.[/citation]
Please look at the specs before ranting. 5 days of standby.


[citation][nom]pocketdrummer[/nom]On another note... why even bother? A crappy XP system will be far less useful than a quick, optimized OS made for a handset.[/citation]

Fine, give me another handheld that works with Garmin Connect when I'm cycling across europe.
 
Microsoft has already said it would stop supporting XP. This smartphone is a little too late. Make it run Windows 7 instead. We're only going backwards in terms of technology if we allow this to continue.
 
I just watched a video of this thing and its HUGE. It looks like an over sized original Nintendo DS. This is still really impressive but theres no way it will sell well.
 
[citation][nom]jeverson[/nom]For thise to lazy to do as search on "pocketables xpphone"... here are the specs...CPU: AMD Super Mobile CPUMemory: 512mb/1GbSSD: 8Gb/16Gb/32Gb/64GbHDD: 30Gb/60Gb/80Gb/120GbLCD: 4.8" TFT Touch LCD 800x480OS: XPWireless: 802.11 b/gCamera: 1.3MpWith these specs... I wonder if it will run Win7[/citation]

A clean install of Windows 7 Beta surprisingly ran A-OK 800Mhz/800MB RAM/6GB HD.
It's perhaps safe to say that Windows 7 is aimed at 7!
700MB RAM,700 Mhz CPU, 7GB HD. The only thing it's missing out on is the 32MB Graphics memory it needs to run smoothly.
 
So current gen tech running a decade old OS. Doesnt sound like progress to me. Whats next a MP3 player that plays VHS? Thats like having horses pull a car or wooden wheels on a Harley.
 
[citation][nom]zelog[/nom]XP recommended hardware: a Pentium/K6 300MHz, 128 MB RAM, 1.5 GB HDDDon't think we'll have a problem with slow and clunky[/citation]
That was before all Service Packs, and before .net framework and internet explorer 7 and 8, and before any programs are installed.

I'm sure you won't run many heavy loaded apps on that phone, but you still need about 386MB of RAM and a 366Mhz CPU.
The SSD might boost up the disk access speed a bit though...
 
they tried this on the iphone and apparently it was uber slow.

but this is a smart phone so it should run it alot better. hell, id take one =]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.