riser :
In a way I agree with you. The concern is a death panel in the US in which they decide who lives/dies based on the cost.. and of course the inside connections someone has into the system.
It is much easier to expect people to work to receive the service of health care.
This is where the divide is in the US. Is healthcare a Right, or a Service?
I will argue that anything you can do on your own without requiring someone else to perform it could be argued as a Right.
Anything that requires someone else to use their expertise for your benefit would be a Service.
I take my dog to the vet. I pay the vet to perform necessary services on my pet. This is not my right. I cannot for someone else to do something that benefits me, even if I compensate them.
That's where I draw the line between a service and a right.
Healthcare is a service. If we somehow screw that concept up, we will ruin our system.
I must admit to not being completely objective on the issue ... even utopian.
This is because, firstly, health is my job. And it seems impossible for me not to admit someone to the hospital under the pretext that he has money problems.
And secondly, I do not know the operation mode of Obamacare ... Perhaps it is bad, maybe not. I do not have the knowledge to debate this issue.
Whether health coverage is a right or a service is a good question. I've never asked me.
But I guess I agree with you on the fact that it is a service.
Moreover, in France, some people used to say that "for free" when they come in hospital... and I fight every day to make it clear that NO, it's not.
For cons, I do not take into account the dog / vet stuff...
You can not compare the health of animals to that of humans.
And if we approach the subject, I will end by saying that I find it outrageous that even today, some people have less access to quality care than pets.
Someone who pay a fortune for varnishing her cat claws is an acceptable thing until a homeless guy die of cold* in the gutter after a diabetic coma.
*mort de froid?? die of cold??