I was merely trying to raz the many 9600P owners in here(it didnt work)
You talking to me? Are you talkin' to me? Then who the hell else are you talkin' to?
You talkin' to me? Well I'm the only one here. Who do you think you're talking to?
Oh yeah... Huh? Ok!?!
Hey I know the FX5700U has it's strengths.
I'd be interested in seeing if driver tweaks would help. Like you say it is an nV TWIMTBP project that they've been talking about for over a year now, so I'm not surprised.
Do you know if it's a VS 2.0-centric games like the X2 Demo?
That would explain a heck of alot. 3 vertex engines versus 2 is almost the equivalent of the diff. between the two. Still the R9600 series does remain playable pretty much throughout the tests even with AA/AF for the most part (except 16x12 has a 'too low' dip). Nice to see that at least. 1280x1024 playble (heck even 16x12 without AA/AF), that's good news for me for a while.
Still would need more than 1 new game to change my outlook on the line in general, but the FX5700U is definitely a worthy competitor of the R9600 line. Look how dismally the FX5600U does. The FX5700U is, as I said when there was a request for input about the buyer's guide, the only FX that I felt was worth it's money. Since then the FX5900XT/SE/LS has been added to that list, too bad they didn't show the performance of one of those.
I also find it funny the Volari does SOOooo poorly. I think that's your <b>real</b> motivation for posting this. Evil! :lol:
- You need a licence to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp <i>(or internet account)</i> ! - <font color=green>RED </font color=green> <font color=red> GREEN</font color=red> GA to SK
