8600 Ultra SLI vs. 8800 Series

SinisterMessiah

Distinguished
Jan 25, 2007
224
1
18,685
This is hard, since we don't really know 100% what the specs of the 8600 cards will be. It does seem to come without any doubt that the 8600 Ultra will be the best of the 8600 series, and for a very reasonable price. By reasonable, I mean sub $250.

With that said, do you imagine that SLI'd 8600 Ultra's could potentially surpass a single 8800 series card? I'm thinking just the 8800GTS, the GTX seems to be quite the heavyweight.

I don't foresee myself spending over $400 on a 8800 GTX. I don't see myself even really wanting to spend more than $300 at once on a video card.

MY train of thought is to purchase a 8600 Ultra at the time of my new PC purchase, and then add a second one at a later date.

Unless the price drops significantly on the 8800GTS and GTX cards by the time those cards come out, I don't see myself buying a 8800 series card. Although we all know how resisting temptation for sweet technology goes.

What course of action are some of you taking? I know it is hard to tell right now without knowing exact specs, but I would imagine some people have been trying to plan for the future, now.
 

pottymonster

Distinguished
Dec 26, 2006
94
0
18,630
if you're willing to spend the money at some point or another, i would say just pony up and get an 8800 series card. based on the fact that SLI isnt always useful, youll get better consistency from an 8800 series card.
 

SinisterMessiah

Distinguished
Jan 25, 2007
224
1
18,685
With that said, do you feel a 8800GTS is a sufficiently good card for the price?

I am assuming the price will drop once the 8600 cards come out, as well as ATI's new cards.

I really do not want to spend the money on a GTX unless the price drops to the $300 range by the time those cards come out or shortly after.
 

pottymonster

Distinguished
Dec 26, 2006
94
0
18,630
my friend has the current 8800gts and an E6400 running his 24inch widescreen dell monitor, and there are no slow downs in his games. so im gonna say, yeah, its more then enough for now and should last you at least a couple of years at high quality settings.
 

ak47is1337

Distinguished
Jan 30, 2006
1,830
0
19,780
my friend has the current 8800gts and an E6400 running his 24inch widescreen dell monitor, and there are no slow downs in his games. so im gonna say, yeah, its more then enough for now and should last you at least a couple of years at high quality settings.
The 8800gts is your best bet, and the 8600 series I would personally avoid for the most part. I think it will be too crippled to be faster than a lot of the x1950 series products, and by the time it is released at a fairly high price, the x1950's will be very cheap and possibly be even faster, just with a lack of DX10 support.
 

Blacken

Distinguished
Aug 27, 2004
641
0
18,980
The 8800gts is your best bet, and the 8600 series I would personally avoid for the most part. I think it will be too crippled to be faster than a lot of the x1950 series products, and by the time it is released at a fairly high price, the x1950's will be very cheap and possibly be even faster, just with a lack of DX10 support.

Definitely. One 8800GTX or GTS is fool-proof mixed with a hint of GPU longevity. Though the 8600 series will have a nice price tag, we will have to roll our thumbs as we wait for graphs.
 

pottymonster

Distinguished
Dec 26, 2006
94
0
18,630
The benifets of going DX10 only applies if your going to upgrade to Vista too.
everybody is going to go vista at some point. and besides, the 8800gts and gtx are still the 2 best cards on the market right now for dx9 as well. just because they have dx10 support doesnt mean they dont support dx9 as well.
 

Blacken

Distinguished
Aug 27, 2004
641
0
18,980
Unless he wants some fluently smooth and maxed out DX9 games. If the 8600U's are tagged at it's $190 pre-precieved price, 2 in SLi should pack quite the DX9 and 10 'punch' cheaply; not to mention being DX10 ready.
 

Athalus_nubie

Distinguished
Dec 10, 2006
115
0
18,680
Hey mate, i would advise against going for a SLI setup, unless you are going to buy both cards at once. In my experience you dont end up getting the 2nd card, because after 6 months have gone by you get better preformance by buying another single better card ;p
 

mpjesse

Splendid
everybody is going to go vista at some point.

Tell that to the folks still using Win2000.

Microsoft thinks Vista is going to sell like hotcakes, but I'm telling you right now it isn't. The only place Vista will sell is in the OEM market...

Hell... the Social Security Administration (as a whole) JUST upgraded to WinXP about 18 months ago. I seriously doubt they're going to be banging on Dell's door lookin' for Vista anytime soon.

Sorry... got off on a tangent there. Not directed at u.
 

SinisterMessiah

Distinguished
Jan 25, 2007
224
1
18,685
Thank you for all the information so far. Very helpful.

In all honestly, I want to build a system for games like Crysis, Supreme Commander, etc. Crysis is obviously going to be the one game I really want to be able to run near flawlessly.

I figure my best bet at this point would be to get a 8800GTS when I build my system, and down the road if i so choose, I can always SLI another 8800GTS.

Heck, maybe by the time I'm ready the GTX's will have dropped enough where I can tolerate the purchase.
 
sli aint worth it, go with a faster single card

This is hard, since we don't really know 100% what the specs of the 8600 cards will be. It does seem to come without any doubt that the 8600 Ultra will be the best of the 8600 series, and for a very reasonable price. By reasonable, I mean sub $250.

With that said, do you imagine that SLI'd 8600 Ultra's could potentially surpass a single 8800 series card? I'm thinking just the 8800GTS, the GTX seems to be quite the heavyweight.

I don't foresee myself spending over $400 on a 8800 GTX. I don't see myself even really wanting to spend more than $300 at once on a video card.

MY train of thought is to purchase a 8600 Ultra at the time of my new PC purchase, and then add a second one at a later date.

Unless the price drops significantly on the 8800GTS and GTX cards by the time those cards come out, I don't see myself buying a 8800 series card. Although we all know how resisting temptation for sweet technology goes.

What course of action are some of you taking? I know it is hard to tell right now without knowing exact specs, but I would imagine some people have been trying to plan for the future, now.
 

ryokinshin

Distinguished
Mar 19, 2006
605
0
18,980
8600ultra reported 180 on release with 512 mb ram, but being released q3 07, the 8600gt at 150 with 256mb ram coming may

prob end up getting amds mid range cards, buyign comp in summer and those cards are coming out may. even if ur not getting dx10 high end, ur prob not gona spend that much on a card dx9. if ur running a dx10 mid range card on dx9 even, its going to be overkill wich is ALWAYS a gd thing, theres no such thing as too many fps
 

SinisterMessiah

Distinguished
Jan 25, 2007
224
1
18,685
Well I am doing my new build by the end of this month, because my buddies computer just bit the dust and he has always liked the one I have now for casual gaming, so I'm going to use that money towards a new build.

I might just suck it up and throw in a 8800GTS, although I'm not sure.

I really want to put it together with a C2D, but I don't think I'll be overclocking, so I might go with an AM2. With my budget, I could do an AM2 build with 2 gigs of ram and a 8800GTS, but It doesn't look like I can do that with a C2D setup. My only concern is will the AM2 bottleneck the 8800GTS?

I was also considering just gettin a 7900GS or something to hold me over till the prices go down and new product comes out, probably getting an eVGA so I can use their step-up program.

The confusion never ends.
 

Rall

Distinguished
Apr 15, 2005
100
0
18,680
Hey guys I just purchased the BFG 8800 GTX and it is awesome. I had a 7900 GTX before, but I wanted something new with my new conroe build. So I sold my 7900 GTX for 255.00 on ebay. The 8800 GTX card cost 550.00 - 50.00 rebate - 255.00. So the final cost was my the new card cost "245.00"
To spend 600.00 for a new card is harsh on the wallet but if you can do what I did, it is more cost effective.
 
Hey guys I just purchased the BFG 8800 GTX and it is awesome. I had a 7900 GTX before, but I wanted something new with my new conroe build. So I sold my 7900 GTX for 255.00 on ebay. The 8800 GTX card cost 550.00 - 50.00 rebate - 255.00. So the final cost was my the new card cost "245.00"
To spend 600.00 for a new card is harsh on the wallet but if you can do what I did, it is more cost effective.

lol and how much did u spend on your old card?
 

Rall

Distinguished
Apr 15, 2005
100
0
18,680
Hey guys I just purchased the BFG 8800 GTX and it is awesome. I had a 7900 GTX before, but I wanted something new with my new conroe build. So I sold my 7900 GTX for 255.00 on ebay. The 8800 GTX card cost 550.00 - 50.00 rebate - 255.00. So the final cost was my the new card cost "245.00"
To spend 600.00 for a new card is harsh on the wallet but if you can do what I did, it is more cost effective.

lol and how much did u spend on your old card?


350.00 off ebay! Also the card was a chaintech not a BFG or EVGA. So the card was cheap.