Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus (
More info?)
In article <akJpc.90$eP6.22@newsfe1-gui.server.ntli.net>, "D R Tester"
<dr.tester[nospam]@ntlworldnospam.com> wrote:
> Put your 2*256Mb in slots 1 (nearest to cpu) and 3 (furthest from cpu) and
> the 512MB in slot 2. Have this arrangement and is working fine, dual channel
> mode really doesn't make a hugh difference on AMD based system (2-3%) unlike
> Intel based systems.
>
> Dom
>
>
> "Petar" <petar.taler_REM@OVE_os.hinet.hr> wrote in message
> news:sxfwrzrelo0r$.dgkkopp2ld8m$.dlg@40tude.net...
> > I currently have 2 x 256 MB of Corsair T1 RAM working in double mode. I
> > would like to install another 512 MB in one module. If I do that would I
> > still have 512-512 double mode? Does somebody have this kind of
> > configuration working? I heard of some cheaper boards having problems with
> > this combination.
> >
> > Tnx.
Maybe I'm missing something here, but if I look at a picture of
the motherboard, slots 1 and 2 (nearest the CPU) are wired together
and are on one channel. Slot 3 is furthest from the CPU and is on
the second channel. Then, the config you want is:
Channel 0 Channel 1
Slot 1 256MB Slot 3 512MB
Slot 2 256MB
That makes the amount of memory on each channel equal.
If the memory on the channels isn't equal, then for the
portion that isn't equal, the memory controller has
no choice but to fetch from only the one channel.
Equal stacks of memory on each pile should work best.
Unequal stacks of memory means the controller can run
in dual channel mode for the lower part of memory,
and single channel mode for the upper part of the
memory.
I wish someone would write a memory filling program
in Linux and test the various configurations, to
give some proof of what is what.
In any case, given that the bandwidth of the processor
bus is matched by the bandwidth of one DIMM running at
the same clock speed, dual channel mode might only help
fill the odd gap, or improve things when the odd
AGP texture transfer is happening.
Paul