just read this article:
http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/2006/05/06/e32006_preview_console_pc_showdown/page3.html
near the bottom:
"Michael Cai breaks down the math for us: Just last year alone, advertisers spent over $60 billion on TV advertising. With 108 million households, that's a total investment of $45 - 50 per month. That's not much from each advertiser's perspective, but if you did away with ads, that's how much money consumers would need to spend to compensate."
surely if they didnt invest in advertising they would not spend the $60 billion? I.e. they would save themselves $60 billion. That means each household would need to spend $45-50 less per month to compensate. I like the sound of that.
Andy.
http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/2006/05/06/e32006_preview_console_pc_showdown/page3.html
near the bottom:
"Michael Cai breaks down the math for us: Just last year alone, advertisers spent over $60 billion on TV advertising. With 108 million households, that's a total investment of $45 - 50 per month. That's not much from each advertiser's perspective, but if you did away with ads, that's how much money consumers would need to spend to compensate."
surely if they didnt invest in advertising they would not spend the $60 billion? I.e. they would save themselves $60 billion. That means each household would need to spend $45-50 less per month to compensate. I like the sound of that.
Andy.