AIDA 64 (ex Everest) Vs Core Temp

mike_fox

Honorable
Sep 6, 2012
22
0
10,520
Hy guys, I just herd about Core Temp for monitoring CPU temps and when I tried it I was a bit surprised to see that it shows me 10 degrees C more than my usual monitoring program AIDA 64.

What worries me is that one program tells me the temp at max stress is 63 which is acceptable and the other gives me 73 which is more than what I want.

Can any Core Temp users tell me how reliable these numbers are? Thanks in advance.

http://img705.imageshack.us/img705/8831/84706220.jpg
http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/1783/35492197.jpg
 
Solution
I have found that realtemp, coretemp, and HWmonitor all have the same readings. The only problem with AIDA 64 that I've seen is that it will display lower temps than the others, at least in my experience. I'd rather use the ones that show a higher temp than a lower temp for safety reasons. Just run realtemp, coretemp, HWmonitor, and AIDA 64 and see which one is not like the others. I haven't found any issues at all using coretemp.
I have found that realtemp, coretemp, and HWmonitor all have the same readings. The only problem with AIDA 64 that I've seen is that it will display lower temps than the others, at least in my experience. I'd rather use the ones that show a higher temp than a lower temp for safety reasons. Just run realtemp, coretemp, HWmonitor, and AIDA 64 and see which one is not like the others. I haven't found any issues at all using coretemp.
 
Solution