AMD 8350 vs. Intel i5 3570k for GAMING

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

xenova

Honorable
Jan 23, 2013
25
0
10,530
My friends and I are in a heated argument over which cpu is superior for gaming. Which of these CPUs has greater overclock potential, less energy consuming, and is superior in overall gaming?
 
Solution


Newer i5's (2500K, 3570K) are definitly better for gaming than any of the newer AMD cpus with 8 cores (FX-83xx,81xx, etc). AMD cpus are still fairly inefficient when it comes to individual core vs Intel's, and gaming on most PC games today still requires cpu performance per core, usually around full use of 4 cores. The more CPU dependent the game, the bigger the gap. That is why, gaming wise, i5's are equal (in some cases slightly better) than their hyperthreading enabled counter parts, i7's. Not all games are effected, but here are a...
I'm making this decision currently and I'm a gamer so that's what I care about most when it comes down to it.

I have two set ups running currently and regardless of which processor I choose I'll need a motherboard upgrade.

If I get the i5 I'll be spending $315
But if I get the 8350 I'll be spending $302.

Both are nearly the same price and I'll for sure be doing some overclocking. I almost feel like I just need to flip a coin.
 


Yea I understand this as well, but for the games that rely on one core at a time the i5 is much better it seems however what games will really be made like that from now on, probably not much and on multi-core usage game wise they both pretty much are on par.

I'm not sure if I should be worried about the power consumption or not in the 8350 but it does look pretty damn high.
 
It depends how you define "superior in gaming". Believe it or not there are differing views here.

First of all are we looking at a real world scenario test or a purely empirical scientific test?

In terms of a Real World Scenario you have to break it down into a few sub groups. One being Single GPU and the other Multi-GPU.

For Single GPU Real World Gaming performance the FX-8350 and the i5-3570K would be equal (bottle-necked by the GPU).
For Multi GPU Real World Gaming performance the i5-3570K would come out on top if the GPUs are 2x Radeon HD 7950+ for AMD or 2x GeFroce GTX 670+ for nVIDIA.

For the purely empirical scientific test the Intel i5-3570K would be coming out on top in pretty much any game. Why? Because we'd be alleviating all other system bottlenecks (thus running at lower resolutions) in order to isolate the CPU performance.

I'd be of the opinion that for gaming what matters is purely Real World. So what will tend to matter will be whether or not if you'll be running a Multi-GPU configuration.

If Multi-GPU... go Intel for top performance
If Single-GPU... go AMD and save yourself some money.

This opinion applies purely for a Gaming system FYI.
 
I'm not a computer whiz, so please go easy on me. I just need someone to clarify for me an observation I mode. I am actually hoping that the majority here is correct as I am presently building an Intel pc...

On passmark.com, FX-8350 performance is just a little bit lower than i7-3770. According to this site, 8350 actually outperforms every other 1155 i7 processor and literally blows every i5 processor out of the water.

How come?

I heard people mention things about hyper and multi-threading and utilizing more cores... what types of operations/applications actually benefit from more cores? Are we talking 3Dmax? Bioinformatics like sequence analysis? Do any games (what type) utilize more cores?

Thanks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.