Well the people at Tom's Hardware managaed to get their hands on the new "top-of-the-line" Bulldozer CPU from AMD, the FX-8150. This is an 8-core CPU at a base clock of 3.6Ghz.
While this sounds good their benchmarks show it is a huge disappointment.
AMD Bulldozer FX-8150 Review
It is comparable to the previous phenom II x4 980 in gaming. The Phenom II costs $170 and is based on a chip 3 years old. The FX-8150 costs $245.
In productivity it is usually on par with the i5-2500k, a 1-year old chip which costs $220.
So if you are building a gaming rig, Bulldozer is out of the question as it is comparable with 3-year old chips that cost $80 less. If you are building a workstation for graphical design/programming, the i5-2500k is comparable at a lower price point, and the i7-2600k blows it out of the water for $55 more. And $55 is rather cheap when building a computer for work-related purposes.
And for servers its power consumption is just too high. Rated at 125W, while similar price-point Intel server CPUs (Intel Xeon E3-1230 at $235) consumes only 80W. So overall there is no market where this chip is best-per-dollar.
Why AMD introduce this kind of flop processor??
I think AMD never beat Intel when performance is the main matter.

While this sounds good their benchmarks show it is a huge disappointment.
AMD Bulldozer FX-8150 Review
It is comparable to the previous phenom II x4 980 in gaming. The Phenom II costs $170 and is based on a chip 3 years old. The FX-8150 costs $245.
In productivity it is usually on par with the i5-2500k, a 1-year old chip which costs $220.
So if you are building a gaming rig, Bulldozer is out of the question as it is comparable with 3-year old chips that cost $80 less. If you are building a workstation for graphical design/programming, the i5-2500k is comparable at a lower price point, and the i7-2600k blows it out of the water for $55 more. And $55 is rather cheap when building a computer for work-related purposes.
And for servers its power consumption is just too high. Rated at 125W, while similar price-point Intel server CPUs (Intel Xeon E3-1230 at $235) consumes only 80W. So overall there is no market where this chip is best-per-dollar.
Why AMD introduce this kind of flop processor??
I think AMD never beat Intel when performance is the main matter.

