sitehostplus
Honorable
That doesn't quite work in New York State. 🤣That's why I threw $35K at a solar and battery solution. No more power bills.
(Syracuse, if you must know)
The scheduled forum maintenance has now been completed. If you spot any issues, please report them here in this thread. Thank you!
That doesn't quite work in New York State. 🤣That's why I threw $35K at a solar and battery solution. No more power bills.
That doesn't quite work in New York State. 🤣
(Syracuse, if you must know)
I checked 5 canadian shops. Arc A750 for $330 CAN in two shops, RX 6600 for $280 CAN in also two shops, RTX 2060 Super 8GB for $320 CAN in one shop, too. Can also import from Amazon/Newegg/Alieexpress for the same total prices, too.I know. I'm in Canada though, so any price variations in the USA will take a month or two to make their way across the border assuming they stick in the first place. And I meant $300 CAN. Taxes bring both the RX6600 and A750 close to $400 CAN.
I mostly only play WoW which still hits 60fps with most details about as high as I can bear before visual fatigue from unnecessary GFX becomes an issue, which is why I can be mostly inflexible on my $300 all-inclusive price cap - don't really need it, not going to upgrade unless someone makes an offer I cannot refuse.It is worth the upgrade? That depends on you.
If you're going to do that, then it's only fair to price GPUs by the Shader (AMD) or CUDA Core (Nvidia). That would show GPUs getting stupid cheap, too.I will admit to one error on my argument.
I should have priced CPU's by the core. Since the Athlon I was comparing to had one one core, and the modern CPU's have multiple cores, that would have really shown how really stupid cheap CPU's are getting.
If you wait long enough, some other external factor (e.g. mining boom, pandemic, AI boom, TSMC going offline, etc.) will trigger another price spike.not going to upgrade unless someone makes an offer I cannot refuse.
Gaming isn't a necessity. If AMD, Nvidia and Intel abandon the genuine entry-level long enough that my 1050 isn't enough to do anything decently well anymore with no worthwhile replacement in sight, quitting gaming is an option too.If you wait long enough, some other external factor (e.g. mining boom, pandemic, AI boom, TSMC going offline, etc.) will trigger another price spike.
Define "better"If AMD were to put out a better product
Let's be realistic here. Most people only want AMD to be "more" competitive so they can buy cheaper Nvidia GPUs. A bit stinky really.
Most predictions don't come true so soonHope AMD cards sale well, then we could get cheaper Nvidia card.
Well, just found an open-box A750 for $270 CAN (~$200 US) and went $10 over-budget to buy it at $310 including taxes. Time to see whether I'll like it or decide to take another bicycle trip to return it.If you wait long enough, some other external factor (e.g. mining boom, pandemic, AI boom, TSMC going offline, etc.) will trigger another price spike.
Congrats!Well, just found an open-box A750 for $270 CAN (~$200 US) and went $10 over-budget to buy it at $310 including taxes. Time to see whether I'll like it or decide to take another bicycle trip to return it.
Well, first impression is: feels like garbage. DP ports aren't working with my monitors and drivers insist on using my UHD TV even when it is unplugged from the GPU, so I have to connect my primary monitor to the IGP to get output and had to spend the first 10min with the card blindly wrangling windows that are outside viewable range to sort that crap out.Congrats!
This is why I never recommend the Intel GPUs as much as I want a third player in the graphics card industry. They are too cumbersome to use still. They have lots of little issues that are not always easily rectified, if at all, and their performance is not the best either.Well, first impression is: feels like garbage. DP ports aren't working with my monitors and drivers insist on using my UHD TV even when it is unplugged from the GPU, so I have to connect my primary monitor to the IGP to get output and had to spend the first 10min with the card blindly wrangling windows that are outside viewable range to sort that crap out.
If I wasn't technically inclined, that would have made me want to return the stupid thing right away. This isn't the sort of crap a normal consumer would put up with. Failing to detect that a monitor has been unplugged is some awfully basic stuff to fail at out of the box.
Edit: Did a clean driver re-install, now DP ports work. Somehow, I'm getting worse frame rates in WoW than I did on my GTX1050: my 1050 could get steady 60fps in most places yet the A750 is jumping all over the place from 50 to 60 and I have ReBAR enabled, so that isn't it.
Ouch... I hope things improve, since on paper it is a better GPU xDWell, first impression is: feels like garbage. DP ports aren't working with my monitors and drivers insist on using my UHD TV even when it is unplugged from the GPU, so I have to connect my primary monitor to the IGP to get output and had to spend the first 10min with the card blindly wrangling windows that are outside viewable range to sort that crap out.
If I wasn't technically inclined, that would have made me want to return the stupid thing right away. This isn't the sort of crap a normal consumer would put up with. Failing to detect that a monitor has been unplugged is some awfully basic stuff to fail at out of the box.
Edit: Did a clean driver re-install, now DP ports work. Somehow, I'm getting worse frame rates in WoW than I did on my GTX1050: my 1050 could get steady 60fps in most places yet the A750 is jumping all over the place from 50 to 60 and I have ReBAR enabled, so that isn't it.
One of the settings I bumped up was "Built-in Low Latency" and turning that off solved the low frame rate issue. Looks like WoW's built-in "low-latency" option has a stiff CPU penalty somewhere.You seem to be getting lower than expected performance in WoW with the a750, most likely a driver issue, because the performance of that card is supposed to be multitudes higher than a 1050.
It used to be worse, it was an unplayable crash fest before, they pushed some recent updates which brought it to the current situation and will likely keep working on it, so it might fixed, eventually, or might not, but Intel already spent the capital to work on this for another 4 years at least. This does not happens much at all in more recent games.Edit: Well, went about doing dailies for a bit as a break-in period, finished my round, hearth and... full system lock-up on load screen. Either the GPU is defective or this is a deal-breaker bug. I normally run my systems for months between reboots, lock-ups every few hours aren't an option.
A card that is 10X more powerful than I need does me absolutely no good if it crashes my PC 10 times per day. Even one crash per week is one too many for my liking.If not feeling like adventuring you can always return it though. I support you on the motion that you just need a card as good as the stuff you wanna play.
Amen.Ahhhh…that shiny new 4090 in the case was me paying for the privilege of not having to worry about GPUs for the next few years.
Overpriced? I dunno. The best should come at a premium… As for AMD cards… never owned one. Ever.
Nvidia has always been the best. If AMD made a better card I’d buy it.
Oh, on paper it's a way better GPU! That's the frustrating thing about Alchemist, right?Ouch... I hope things improve, since on paper it is a better GPU xD
I think this is a known issue. Alchemist has high idle power, and AFAIK they were only able to partially resolve it through driver fixes. This is one of the reasons I'm holding out for a refresh.Something is causing the memory to stay at 2GHz even at idle with GPU core power in the 35-40W range, which is mildly annoying.
There is supposedly a "fix" for the high power which requires screwing around with PCIe power management states, which is how I ended up looking for a BIOS update in case there were related changes in there. While looking around my old BIOS for such settings the first time around, I also noticed that on exit-and-save, the changes list often included stuff I hadn't changed (ex.: SpeedStep going from 'auto' to 'disabled' despite me not touching CPU settings or memory timings going back to default despite not touching memory settings), which was another reason for updating.I think this is a known issue. Alchemist has high idle power, and AFAIK they were only able to partially resolve it through driver fixes. This is one of the reasons I'm holding out for a refresh.