griptwister :
A complete misunderstanding of what I was trying to say during my poor wording. I meant, We'll see if the GTX 7XX series and R9 Series GPUs support Direct X 12. If so, I look forward to picking up a 780 soon. Lol. I was strongly considering going z87...
But then I got a price to the wallet. I say, my money is better spent on a GPU for my rez of 1440P lol. My Little 7870 is bogging down a bit too much for my taste. I would buy a 2nd 7870. But I like a small bit of filtering. Just for the crisper Image. 2Gb isn't enough these days. Then again Money isn't enough. You see that $4,000 r9 290x on newegg a while back? G-bus.
You for sure need at least a 280X. 3GB VRAM+. I know some newer games maxed out at 1080P can eat up 2GB of VRAM.
I never saw the 290X hit $4K on Newegg but I saw HD7970s hit $1.5K on EBay. I saw the 290X hit $900 on Egg. Now the Asus DCUII is $619 which is only $40 bucks more than Asus MSRP of $579.99 so not too bad considering it cools way better than the stock and maintains a consisted 1050MHz core clock.
jdwii :
jimmysmitty :
Cazalan :
gamerk316 :
griptwister :
We'll see what happens with DX 12 and if the next gen GPUs come out soon.
DX12 has been cooking for about two years now, so I'm expecting a lot more then a lower-level APi.
They must have had to do something to make XBone more efficient. I just want to know if it's going to be available for Win 7/8 or if they're going to cheese out and force people to do Win 9.
Still I think we can all thank AMD for lighting a fire under their arse.
The XB1 is more efficient because it is one set piece of hardware that is actually very similar to the PS4 so
optimizing it is easy. That's why the 360/PS4 lasted so long. If they had one set of hardware for PC games to be coded for, we would probably be able to use the same system for 5-10 years without the need for upgrades like we do now.
But since there is thousands upon thousands of different hardware configs, we lose a lot of power out of our systems.
juggernautxtr :
Cazalan :
gamerk316 :
griptwister :
We'll see what happens with DX 12 and if the next gen GPUs come out soon.
DX12 has been cooking for about two years now, so I'm expecting a lot more then a lower-level APi.
They must have had to do something to make XBone more efficient. I just want to know if it's going to be available for Win 7/8 or if they're going to cheese out and force people to do Win 9.
Still I think we can all thank AMD for lighting a fire under their arse.
hahaha no DX 12 was even announced till AMD said screw you M$, guaranteed you will be buying W9, or have W8/8.1 to get it.
Considering that MS is getting ready to actually unveil and show off DX12 pretty soon I am going to assume they have probably been working on it for a while. I don't think they could create something to show off in just a few months.
Yet, the PS4 has 50% more gpu shaders and 2.5 times the amount of bandwidth pretty sure we will see lower visuals on the xbone for the whole entire gen. Not to say there won't be good visuals on the system still.
It has more shaders and utilizes GDDR5 but it is the same CPU and graphics core. I don't doubt that the PS4 will be able to have higher resolutions but then again there have been some recent games coming out that are trying to run at 1080p and are having massive FPS drops.
I am willing to bet they will end up very similar overall and the next gen era of 1080p gaming wont be as nice for consoles as it has been for us in PC for the past couple of years.
jdwii :
griptwister :
A complete misunderstanding of what I was trying to say during my poor wording. I meant, We'll see if the GTX 7XX series and R9 Series GPUs support Direct X 12. If so, I look forward to picking up a 780 soon. Lol. I was strongly considering going z87...
But then I got a price to the wallet. I say, my money is better spent on a GPU for my rez of 1440P lol. My Little 7870 is bogging down a bit too much for my taste. I would buy a 2nd 7870. But I like a small bit of filtering. Just for the crisper Image. 2Gb isn't enough these days. Then again Money isn't enough. You see that $4,000 r9 290x on newegg a while back? G-bus.
i doubt it, but i guess theres a first time for everything usually Microsoft does things that forces people to buy new hardware.
Interestingly enough, 7 ran better than Vista on older P4 based systems.
That said, Microsoft utilizes the hardware that is there. I don't see why not. But they are not the main problem. The main problem is drivers are not made for the newer OSes after a while and that makes the new hardware useless on newer systems.
I bet that soon newer OSes wont support PCI much like I doubt Windows 7 supports EISA cards. I can't tell for sure as I didn't have a working motherboard with EISA on it that could support a minimum of 1GB RAM.
So it looks like AMD is doing like Intel. Sempron and entry level Athlons will be the ultra low end and low power much like Intel now has Atom in for Celeron and entry level Pentiums.
Weird naming for the socket though. AM1 for low power, FM2 for APUs and AM3+ for CPUs.