AMD Piledriver rumours ... and expert conjecture

Page 25 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.
We have had several requests for a sticky on AMD's yet to be released Piledriver architecture ... so here it is.

I want to make a few things clear though.

Post a question relevant to the topic, or information about the topic, or it will be deleted.

Post any negative personal comments about another user ... and they will be deleted.

Post flame baiting comments about the blue, red and green team and they will be deleted.

Enjoy ...
 
PD is only to be 10-15% better than the current BD and that's not including the stepping revision BD either..
and I was laughin' because I agree..

as for Ivy, if you have Nehalem (i5-760 to i7-880) or current SB (i5-2500K) AND if primarily talking about gaming
there is NO NEED to move to Ivy.
there is little room for more truth in this post.
 
@mal I am running the FX-4100 @ 4.1 (-0.5v) on the GA-990FXA-UD3 and everthing was fine until I added a GTX 560ti (2 days ago).

The multiplier is dropping from x20.5 to x16 even though the CPU temp is hovering between 35 and 40C. The only thing I can think of is the TIMPN2 sensor (which will not show up in EasyTune) is reading at 50-55C

The card is exhausting half the heat into the case but apparently the 2 120mm fans I added while installing the card isn't enough to get rid of it. I have two more to install but I need some molex to 3-pin adapters first.

I dont know what the sensor is reading because the 'Board Temp' is reported at ~38C in EasyTune which corresponds to TIMPN1 but as long as it shows those high temps the board is downclocking the CPU like mad.

You may not have the same problems with lighter use (my system is at full load 24/7 for F@H) and better cooling but the FX-4170 is supposed to run at higher clocks with a higher TDP.
 
LOL yeah you would like that! :lol:

I am afraid of what will happen when I add a second in a few months. I need to figure out the cooling situation before then.

I think may be the south bridge I am not sure. I have room to throw a fan on the side panel for intake and an additional for exhaust on the top.

I want to get all of this ironed out before PD is released (that means I have 18 months right? 😀) so I can decide on my CPU upgrade without being concerned with TDP.
 
@mal I am running the FX-4100 @ 4.1 (-0.5v) on the GA-990FXA-UD3 and everthing was fine until I added a GTX 560ti (2 days ago).

The multiplier is dropping from x20.5 to x16 even though the CPU temp is hovering between 35 and 40C. The only thing I can think of is the TIMPN2 sensor (which will not show up in EasyTune) is reading at 50-55C

The card is exhausting half the heat into the case but apparently the 2 120mm fans I added while installing the card isn't enough to get rid of it. I have two more to install but I need some molex to 3-pin adapters first.

I dont know what the sensor is reading because the 'Board Temp' is reported at ~38C in EasyTune which corresponds to TIMPN1 but as long as it shows those high temps the board is downclocking the CPU like mad.

You may not have the same problems with lighter use (my system is at full load 24/7 for F@H) and better cooling but the FX-4170 is supposed to run at higher clocks with a higher TDP.

TMPIN0 = Sytem (Motherboard) Temp
TMPIN1 = CPU Temp
TMPIN2 = Northbridge Temp

Uninstall Easy tune, that only work for...uhmmm....use space in your HDD or SSD
 
is it true that trinity (afaik will use piledriver cpu core) will have vliw4? then will it be impossible to hybrid-cfx trinity with higher end radeons like 77xx (76xx too?) and higher?
after reading the 7970 article, i am more hopeful than ever. amd has always delivered on gfx cards and fusion apus. cpus... not so much.
 
if they are am3 compatible, im buying one, but in reality i expect they are fx-8xxx that cant reach high clockspeeds so are being rebadged, similar to the old athlons, which were just phenoms with defective cache to begin with until the yields improved
 
if they are am3 compatible, im buying one, but in reality i expect they are fx-8xxx that cant reach high clockspeeds so are being rebadged, similar to the old athlons, which were just phenoms with defective cache to begin with until the yields improved
if its the case
then they are spoiling the awesome phenom 2 series

but if it is a pair of phenom 2 x4 bridged together and in 32nm so as to keep its tdp in limit, then we can compare it to i7-2700 in multithreaded application.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.