cmi86 :
I just don't like reading toms reviews of AMD products anymore. It's not that they are (always) being untrue or stacking the deck against AMD because they are not...blah blah
Oh good grief. Guru3D had essentially the exact same review and comments, hence their "Great Value" rating and not "Guru Recommended" that they gave the 1070. The 480 is not a mind blowing new innovation card for the low-mid segment. It's more of a refresh. Benchmarks compared to the 290/380 prove it. The two good things worth mentioning are the lower price and lower power use.
Also take note that the GPU has received a lukewarm reception from readers on many different tech sites (not just here on Tom's) as well. You think that's some sort of massive bias conspiracy against AMD too? Read through those 200+ comments on the Guru3D review. It's the same complaints we saw here from people saying Tom's didn't go dancing in the street about the Fury X which was SUPPOSED to be the 980Ti killer and wound up being anything BUT that (it had zero overclocking headroom already being maxed out, and an overclocked factory superclocked 980Ti destroyed it).
Jumping up and down and celebrating because the 480 keeps up with a nearly two year old higher tier and more expensive GTX 970 is not much to brag about. Every new generation card should be
expected to outperform the previous same tier card, and come close to matching the previous card's next up tier (including across tiers between AMD and Nvidia).
As expected, AMD continues to rule the main stream market for performance and value as they have for many generations now. In other words, it's nothing earth shattering. Finally, unlike Nvidia, it's another showing by AMD of a rather weak reference design (overclocking potential specifically).