I went to Anandtech and read their updated performance article. It seems that even with updated drivers, the Intel i5 520M wasn't able to graphically compete. That being said, there were no performance benchmarks on the actual CPU performance. A processor at 1.6GHz is more than likely going to not compete super well with a 2.4GHz in raw computational power. I'm guessing that with the Zacate setup there is some serious offloading on the the integrated GPU, or APU, is that what they call it? Still, the performance graphics-wise is very heartening. Especially when you consider this is for the 500 range of notebooks, and under including the 9w little brother which is going to try and challenge Intel's Atom chip in the netbook arena. Low end notebooks could prove to be interesting in the near future. I await the Llano and Bulldozer TDP and performance numbers. If they perform well, AMD will definitely look more appealing to companies, such as Apple. Which is something I wouldn't mind seeing, even though it will still be Apple stupid expensive.