AMD strain SI for all

wooooooo



perhaps this WONT be a reincarnation of the Tbred A ?

-------
<A HREF="http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/you.html" target="_new">please dont click here! </A>
Brand name whores are stupid!
 
<A HREF="http://news.com.com/AMD+sneaks+strained+silicon+into+chips/2100-1006_3-5317169.html" target="_new"> BOO! </A>



<font color=blue>The day <font color=green>Microsoft</font color=green> will make something that doesn't suck is the day they'll start making vacuum cleaners.</font color=blue>
 
What I want to know is; when will Intel implement SOI?

<font color=blue>The day <font color=green>Microsoft</font color=green> will make something that doesn't suck is the day they'll start making vacuum cleaners.</font color=blue>
 
Intel has always said SOI didn't make economic sense for them until 65nm. From what I read, its likely they will move to FD-SOI (fully depleted SOI) then, assuming the tech is ready/affordable/worthwhile by that time. AMD will likely stick to PD-SOI for their 65nm process.

Judging by Prescott, I'd say intel made a mistake by ignoring PD-SOI.. but I'm curious what 65nm will bring.

= The views stated herein are my personal views, and not necessarily the views of my wife. =
 
Won't 65nm be even hotter? There is already problems with 90nm and energy leakage, so how do they expect to get to 65nm and not have problems?

<A HREF="http://ricserv.servebeer.com" target="_new"> My website </A>