Yes. Currently streaming switch games from my pc to.... my switch. For that 60 fps high resolution glory.
Both AMD and Intel have a problem with their respective launches: cheap-ish 7800X3Ds and 5700X3D/5800X3D.
AMD needs to think really hard on the price, otherwise it'll be another value clowns launch like Zen5 was.
3D is, first and foremost, a gaming CPU and value is king there. So I'd expect AMD will be able to read the room from all the Zen5 criticism. Unlikely given recent past history.
At least, I hope they now know how to test
Regards.
The only technical advantage consoles have is that most of the games that have stutter problems on PC don't on console. This is certainly a developer problem, but it's the only consistent issue which only affects one platform. Otherwise the console advantage is just price based as it's impossible to get the same level of performance with 2TB storage on PC.
Pretty sure the post you quoted was a critique of AMD marketing and not the actual product performance.
Why? Jensen is absolutely convinced* he's giving you the best value you deserve if you buy nVidia: "the more you buy, the more you save".
Productivity is exactly why I wouldn't consider X3D chips as they stand now. They're kings of gaming, but otherwise are mediocre and can be equaled in efficiency and/or surpassed in performance by their non-X3D counterparts. However if the 9000 series X3D parts are able to get close to the same clocks as non I'd seriously consider it as I do care about high minimum frame rates in every action title I play.
That depends if it's a game that takes advantage of AMD's V-Cache. Steve Burke from Gamers Nexus has showed that when a game is written to take advantage of the CPU's V-Cache, you can expect a nice performance boost.
I might be in the minority here, but I game at highly GPU bound settings. When I want 4k, 60 fps is about all my GPU can handle and at 1440p 120 fps is all it can handle.
IME 5090 will be a waste, almost every gen getting the 70 or 80 class gives best C/P ration which will still serve max settings for most games in the coming 2-3 years, after that the 90 class don't get you much more anyway as the new 50%+ performance next gen is again coming..
Take your low effort lame trolling somewhere else. It's just embarrassing, this isn't reddit. Both games I played at 5120x1440 super-ultrawide, no DLSS, Ultra settings with Ray Tracing at over 100FPS on a 4090. Not that anyone with any clue would need to be told.
Also lets not forget with no competition anywhere near the top end you are not going to gain anything from a price to performance standpoint. If it meets your needs now like a 3080 theres no need to pay for non-generational improvement it'll just be that the 5060 will be near the 3080 price; or the 5070ti will be near the 4090 price (whichever is closer to a no improvement @ per dollar invested).
Some games are indeed bottlenecked by CPU even at 4k, mostly for background shader rendering or say, system simulation in flight sim etc. those maybe rare but did occur.
Wut? No. I've been skipping GPU gens since March 2019 because the 4000 series was so lacklustre. I'm looking at an RTX 5060/5070 for a mid 2025 upgrade assuming they price it similarly to the 4060/4070. I would urge anyone thinking of building a new gaming PC to wait for the new nVidia GPUs before buying the overpriced 4000 series GPUs.
Yes and no. The stutter issue exists on console as well, to a much lower degree cause the framerate is a lot lower as well. Try jedi on a PC with locked 30 fps and the stutter issue will go away just like in a console. I've tested this with hogwarts for example (a stutterfest of a game).
If anything is to be trusted in the reviews so far, the 9950X is quite a bit faster than the 14900KS, and likely faster than the Ultra 9 285k while using less power, so it looks like quite a no brainer IMO at the meantime, but if you've been waiting so far it would be interesting to see the ARL launch reviews also, and maybe the X3D launch, as it seems somehow the 9800X3D have made some break through (if it's not stupidly flawed as to self destruct) and get even higher clocks than the 9700X, as such the new X3D lineup could be an all rounder faster chip (though I will keep skeptical as it sounds too good to be true)
Definitely give it until mid November. By then we'll know all the numbers from trusted 3rd party sources.
You think the 5000 series pricing is gonna be any different?
Worked on me
I have an excuse, had a 3090 before, not much else to upgrade to.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram