News AMD Zen 4 Ryzen 7000 Specs, Release Date Window, Benchmarks, and More

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
AMD leaked by accident (allegedly) the SKUs for the first batch of Ry 7K CPUs and the 8-core part will be 7700X, which is interesting for two reasons: the 8-core SKU is the "best" full-CCD silicon for OC'ing (best PBO curves and all that; silicon lotery if you will) and they clearly received the message after their lackluster 5700X launch. That thing is basically at the same price as the 5800X nowadays; what a (bad) joke. Same-ish with the 5600 non-X. They could bin the better CCDs for either X3D or just a later release for the 7800X (like the 3800XT, but less stupid).

I mean, I just hope they've learned their lessons as this will be like the 5th time they're releasing SKUs and all previous times, except the 2K gen, they made a fool of themselves in one way or another with head-scratchers, lol.

Anyway, I would also say that the iGPU being RDNA2 and having 6-8CUs is more or less fully confirmed by now? I can't remember TBH. I mention that because the article could use some proper updates in tables and other paragraphs with the new information.

Regards.

I would argue AMD knew perfectly well what it was doing. It was trying to increase margins during high demand. Yes most reviewers roasted them for it. But imagine if they released a 5700X at a 5800X price point on launch day?!

5700X is a story of too little too late. Even with a small 3% performance difference, it's still competing against 12th Gen Alder Lake Intel. Hence the crashing prices.
 
I would argue AMD knew perfectly well what it was doing. It was trying to increase margins during high demand. Yes most reviewers roasted them for it. But imagine if they released a 5700X at a 5800X price point on launch day?!

5700X is a story of too little too late. Even with a small 3% performance difference, it's still competing against 12th Gen Alder Lake Intel. Hence the crashing prices.
That's what I was implying: they got roasted not because they were trying to be greedy (as you point out, everyone noticed; they weren't coy abut it), but their really bad timing with the release of the cheaper SKUs instead of just cutting the prices of the same SKUs via an announcement. That would've been cheaper overall for even them, so that's one of the head scratchers for me. If they had the SKUs ready to go from the get go and they just held them until too late, well, the more reason for me to say: "I hope they learned their lesson".

Regards.
 
  • Like
Reactions: digitalgriffin
DDR5 also has in-built ECC mechanisms for data at rest, which requires additional dies to provide the same memory capacity as DDR4.

This is not true.

Bog-standard non-ECC DDR5 does not have an extra memory die to protect data at rest.

DDR5 has on-module ECC to protect the transmission and read/write of data between the on-module memory controller and the individual on-module memory dies. Once the on-module memory controller has confirmed that the data written to the individual on-module memory chip is the data it sent, the extra ECC data is dumped, it is not preserved for a future read to detect bit-rot or 'cosmic-ray' corruption. For the latter, just as with DDR4, you need actual ECC DDR5 RAM modules.
 
We're expecting a revamped architecture with higher IPC, double the L2 cache, possibly double the L3 cache as well. Given the Zen 3 chiplets were only around 84mm^2, I would expect Zen 4 chiplets would be of a similar size overall.

Don't forget AVX-512, that'll eat into the transistor budget significantly as well (although that could be covered in "revamped architecture", but thought it worth pointing out explicitly).
 
  • Like
Reactions: JarredWaltonGPU
The question is if Socket AM5 will be able to attract Socket AM4 users, and I don't think it will. Let's say it's on average 25% faster per thread than the Ryzen 5000 series. The cost of a new motherboard and RAM in addition to the CPU makes that 25% cost an awful lot. Even a Zen 2 or Zen 1 user can drop in a Zen 3 CPU into their existing setup for a large to enormous performance gain for a relatively small price.

Also assuming that AMD is going to attempt to keep the same pace as Intel, the next 3 or 4 years should bring relatively decent to large increases in performance and efficiency across all segments each year, and the last thing most people want is to buy in at the start only to see each generation bring a large performance increase, as those of us who were Socket AM4 early adopters saw.

Combine this with increasing GPU supply and more people finally being able to see what their existing Socket AM4 setup can actually do, and I predict quite sluggish sales of AM5 systems.

Same problem with Intel. You have to pay a lot to move intel system. And we can be quite sure that AMD AM5 will get much longer support than Intel will give to its platform!
But yeah. Those with big pockets will go to these first. And the rest will follow when DDR5 is cheaper than DDR4 is now. So I expect AMD to sell zen3 CPU quite many years to support that segment of users. Most likely we will even see new APU cpus to AM4 socket in the future!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: King_V
That's a big premium for the next 16 core. I could get the last gen for under 500 right now. So they are asking 300 dollar premium?

Intel is increasing prices. AMD is increasing prices... It is also called general inflation, that we have now. Everything is gonna more expensive in the next few years...
Well, we are already used to it. Aren´t we?
 
  • Like
Reactions: King_V
Same problem with Intel. You have to pay a lot to move intel system. And we can be quite sure that AMD AM5 will get much longer support than Intel will give to its platform!
But yeah. Those with big pockets will go to these first. And the rest will follow when DDR5 is cheaper than DDR is now. So I expect AMD to sell zen3 CPU quite many years to support that segment of users. Most likely we will even see new APU cpus to AM4 socket in the future!
People who want the bleeding edge performance...will go.
People (like me) waiting to replace an old system or get a new PC...will go.
Those who live to upgrade CPU's....are rare in the grand scheme of things.
 
Heaven forbid from using code names when referring to AMD CPU's. It was bad enough with Intel having so many versions of their CPU's and journalist's using code names. I don't read most reviews about Intel due to that reason. I need a translation sheet to understand what the article is about.

AMD made it simple. ZEN1-4 and stick with it! Is it so had to write "mobile platform", modified server CPU? You're not creating a new wheel.
 
I have been sitting on my XPS 730x since 2008. Only small in-between OS, RAM and HDD upgrades. Even with now being on my third failed Dell proprietary MB, PSU and AIO, I only buy something totally new every 6-8 years. Naturally the past Covid and present economic conditions having raised havoc with my replacement timetables or dreams. I am also aghast of the new generation hardware prices being announced, which for many is making a new build a hard nut to swallow. Greetings from Stehekin, WA and the man on the street!

Ahhhhhh... That was like a $9000+ PC back then!

"The Dell XPS 730x is a no-holds-barred gaming PC that packs the bleeding edge of computing technology — the fastest Intel Core i7 CPU, two powerful graphics cards, water cooling and 6GB of DDR3 RAM — into a slick (if massive) case. Its price is simply ridiculous, but if you are after a powerful gaming computer from a brand name company and money is no object, this is the one to get. "
 
AMD NOW HAVE 6000MHZ Memory till the end of the month will be 6400 so you check of "New" 8 + 25 where only ONE COre can work on Maximum it\s for Benchmarking mot live - B from Intel with 7NM and 125TDP you forget AMD Look differently on this TDP so is low Maybe 120-W
 
The motherboard I'm eyeing (Gigabyte Tachyon B650E) won't be out until early Oct (at the earliest) and now, there are reports that the X3D versions of the 7950, 7900, and 7800 chips will come out early next year, AND that AMD has made improvements to the cache layering so that clock speeds will stick closer to their non-X3D variants.

I don't think I want to wait THAT long to build my system but it gives me something to think about.

Definitely exciting times as good competing performance should just drive down prices. My 9900k has served me very well but I'm definitely switching to the red team next gen.
 
The motherboard I'm eyeing (Gigabyte Tachyon B650E) won't be out until early Oct (at the earliest) and now, there are reports that the X3D versions of the 7950, 7900, and 7800 chips will come out early next year, AND that AMD has made improvements to the cache layering so that clock speeds will stick closer to their non-X3D variants.

I don't think I want to wait THAT long to build my system but it gives me something to think about.

Definitely exciting times as good competing performance should just drive down prices. My 9900k has served me very well but I'm definitely switching to the red team next gen.
Keep in mind VCache does not help in all tasks and it's main uplift is in games. Also, these CPUs (including Intel's) just have enough performance to make most differences shown in benchmarks almost moot to the average gamer, allowing you to push many frames anyway. The wins are becoming more of a "technical" win more than a "practical difference" win.

This is to say, even if AMD does strike your fancy at launch, you don't need to wait for the VCache stuff if you're not into competitive gaming or have a very specific use for the extra cache. More so because AMD won't sell it as a replacement of current parts MSRPs, but instead they'll put them above (notice the gaps in the lineup), so you will still pay more for them. Also, because I'm sure Intel won't be far away from AMD on performance.

What I would say though, anyone that can wait for both Raptor Lake and Zen4 benchmarks, should wait. Rushing a purchase with either doesn't seem like a good idea to me as there will be specific price points where I'm sure one will perform better than the other per dollar.

Regards.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KyaraM and alceryes
Keep in mind VCache does not help in all tasks and it's main uplift is in games. Also, these CPUs (including Intel's) just have enough performance to make most differences shown in benchmarks almost moot to the average gamer, allowing you to push many frames anyway. The wins are becoming more of a "technical" win more than a "practical difference" win.

This is to say, even if AMD does strike your fancy at launch, you don't need to wait for the VCache stuff if you're not into competitive gaming or have a very specific use for the extra cache. More so because AMD won't sell it as a replacement of current parts MSRPs, but instead they'll put them above (notice the gaps in the lineup), so you will still pay more for them. Also, because I'm sure Intel won't be far away from AMD on performance.

What I would say though, anyone that can wait for both Raptor Lake and Zen4 benchmarks, should wait. Rushing a purchase with either doesn't seem like a good idea to me as there will be specific price points where I'm sure one will perform better than the other per dollar.

Regards.
Yes. Very true. Gaming performance is most important for me as I could pretty much run my business on an overclocked potato. 😉
I know Raptor Lake will be a screamer because Intel has got some of the best P-cores available, but I don't like the E-core direction. Or, more specifically, I don't like the introduction of something that Intel pushes as the best thing since sliced bread, but that barely makes a performance difference outside of some synthetic benchmarks and is even a detriment in many games. I have no doubt that it will get better, and may even become a benefit across all types of workloads in a couple generations, but on the 12th gen Intel CPU E-cores are just a waste of sand, IMHO.

Waiting is a good idea for those who want the most bang for your buck and aren't really partial one way or another as I see some great mid-tier CPU price wars coming the first half of next year. For me however, I won't be going back to Intel until their E-cores are at least good for something (other than holding the P-cores back in gaming).
 
The question is if Socket AM5 will be able to attract Socket AM4 users, and I don't think it will. Let's say it's on average 25% faster per thread than the Ryzen 5000 series. The cost of a new motherboard and RAM in addition to the CPU makes that 25% cost an awful lot. Even a Zen 2 or Zen 1 user can drop in a Zen 3 CPU into their existing setup for a large to enormous performance gain for a relatively small price.

Also assuming that AMD is going to attempt to keep the same pace as Intel, the next 3 or 4 years should bring relatively decent to large increases in performance and efficiency across all segments each year, and the last thing most people want is to buy in at the start only to see each generation bring a large performance increase, as those of us who were Socket AM4 early adopters saw.

Combine this with increasing GPU supply and more people finally being able to see what their existing Socket AM4 setup can actually do, and I predict quite sluggish sales of AM5 systems.
I think ordinary people, which are even on Ryzen 3000 dont have reason to upgrade to Ryzen 7000 line. Ryzen 3000 CPUs were already good gaming cpus and if you have something like 3800X or better, you are good to go for another X years. I personally have 5900X and also dont have reason to upgrade. But Im fan of hardware, so Im looking forward for upgrade to 7900X.

I think now is golden age of PCs. You can buy x years old cpu for great price and still have power you will never use. Even if next gen will be twice as powerful...you dont need it. There are of course other aspects of newer platforms.
 
Thank you for this summary article.

My hope as a 3960X user: INTEL will eventually be able to put more than 8 performance cores in one package and be competitive again in HEDT so that AMD feels the need to release a non-PRO version of a Threadripper 7000 series. I need the cores, the PCIe lanes and the memory channels :)
If u think harder u will realise thats pretty much what AM5 Zen4 yields.

an ok 16 cores 128GB ram (~extendable via new ~dram nvme feature)

an extra 4 lanes, which is also 4x bandwidth of pcie 3 or 2x bandwidth of pcie 4 (~equals 4x or 2x the former number of lanes in bandwidth equivalents. A pcie4 x4 nvme drive is as fast on a pcie4 x2 slot as it is on a pcie3 x4 slot afaik ).

Similarly, the sharable bandwidth pool on the am5 chipset is double the bandwidth, & hence offers far more, & more powerful, chipset IO ports &lanes.

pcie4 or pcie3 makes it unlikely a full 16 lanes is of use for dgpu - making 8 lanes or maybe 12 lanes free for other devices

it cow includes a competent IGP.
 
Thank you for this summary article.

My hope as a 3960X user: INTEL will eventually be able to put more than 8 performance cores in one package and be competitive again in HEDT so that AMD feels the need to release a non-PRO version of a Threadripper 7000 series. I need the cores, the PCIe lanes and the memory channels :)


I think the chance of AMD bringing back TR as an HEDT part is close to zero. First, I think the amount of people who are hobbyists that can use TR is very small. It just so happens most visit tech sites so you think it's a larger group than it really is.

Second, probably most people who need TR need it for work. In which case AMD probably feels you should be using a Pro part.

Third, people who are buying these even when they DID have TR HEDT probably needed support part of the time, which is why AMD feels you need to be buying a Pro part and get AMD's full support.

Forth, Nvidia and Intel have left the room, so no major company making parts for PC are supporting HEDT anymore and I think it's all for the same reason, not enough sales and having to provide too much support.

Fifth, while a typical desktop part is never going to give you the memory bandwidth you would get with something like quad DDR5, DDR5 offers memory access that can take advantage of the dual channel per DIMM from what I understand. To get a full 64 bit data word yes you need to treat a DIMM as single channel, but I'm pretty sure in all that ISA for X86-64 you have 32 bit access and BYTE access, in which case the system I believe can treat a single DIMM as dual channel.

Sixth, with the move to PCIe gen5 and the addition of 4 additional lanes that some if not most X670E MBs take to the 2nd chipset and NOT to a second NVMe, which is why you have the possibility of double the I/O with USB ports, SATA, etc..........., this removes the need for various adapters people would plug into all those PCIe slots with a TR MB. This reduces the need for so many lane going to slots, where in most cases I'm guessing most people never used who bought TR HEDT. Then add in that the MBs can have 4 NVMe ports and you can put them in RAID, and more than just RAID 0 and 1.

Seventh, you can put 3 GPUs on the slots, if there is the physical space on X670E and get X8/X8/X4 where the minimal is PCIe gen4 and one slot is gen5. Even gen4 X4 is more bandwidth than most GPUs use, but it is at the border, but gen4 X8 is WAY more than enough bandwidth. So, the point is because of the move to gen5, adding 4 more lanes, adding a 2nd chipset and building in a lot more IO into the MB including LOTS of USB 10Gbps ports along with a couple 20Gbps ports, and you can use a USB port for a plug in 10Gbps ethernet connection, you can have all the conductivity that MOST people who would buy TR as HEDT would need. Yes I know it won't meet EVERY use case, but most. Yes I know to take advantage of the slots for multiple GPUs your GPUs need to be running at least PCe gen4.

Eighth, AMD is going to add more cores with Zen 5 and when they do, Ryzen with a top end MB is HEDT in almost every regard except memory.

Lastly, people who make money off their systems who would buy HEDT to do their work should really be using a Pro part and get the full support, IF they need so much resources that you need all those memory channels and all those PCIe slots, ALL those cores, etc..... which is to say if you can't do it with X670E which can do a HELL of a lot, more than Intel MBs with Alder Lake or Raptor Lake, you're probably making money with your system and should be using a Pro system.


I figure the chance of AMD ever bringing back TR to HEDT is about zero. But you never know.