I can't believe this kind of unbiased reviewing goes on. Look at all the Radeon cards. They all have 3GB of ram or more so they perform better at higher than 1080 resolution. Where are the 1080 benchmarks that most of the gaming public game on? Can't make the Radeons look bad. 4k resolutions for most of the benchmarks give me a break like we didn't know the results before the test. Tech power up has the real benchmarks for the Asus Mars at differing resolutions. 2 gig just isn't enough to game at higher than 1080 and the reviewer should have known this. If Asus put two 4 gig 760's together we would be looking at a real winner. I suspect that the resolutions and settings were cherry picked to make the Mars look bad. Overclocked this card can be the fastest at 1080 or 2560 resolution in a lot of games. The 2 gig per core becomes severely limiting at 4k. The memory doesn't stack even when using SLI. Even playing Skyrim at 1080 on my 4 gig 760gtx, it pulls in nearly 1.9 gigs of ram used (GPUZ) with settings maxed on my windows 8.1 pc. The higher the resolution and quality settings the more ram you use.