mrface :
anywaypasible, are insects/consumers allowed to do LSD? 'cause if that is illegal then you might be in trouble, bro. 😛
one would think those situations have already been done enough to examine principles.. but, as they say 'it is all fun and games until somebody gets hurt'
so when you are playing around feeding consumers or insects some LSD .. there does prove to be the inevitable event that something different happens, usually referenced to as evolution.
i mean, personally.. i have already seen the headspikes.
i could certainly see how the situation could be inhumane and thus unlawful, for consumer or insect.
to really pull things in on itself for the topic of this thread, i dont think anybody has the right to take something so very old and apply a new definition to it.
i dont expect the bible to mean anything, specifically for the fact that it could have been written as a crossword puzzle.
a group of people in the desert writing away whenever they felt the urge to say something.. and as playful as it proves to be when two people try to write a sentence after eachother, sometimes something makes sense and they go with it for a moment.
bringing the book back into town for other people to write into it and share the same game.
and then passing out the book for others to dive deep into.. for the psychology of it all, and probably because the persons doing the writing were highly respected and on vacation.. or some other subset of mental caging.
obviously, as generations came and went.. the book grew to something like a ghost story from history (like anything old in an attic)
and the people didnt throw it out because of the poetry it contained.
based on the poetry of the writing, the rest was also available to be respected.
bringing people to become a novice psychologist.
and that would bring along a bunch of nuisance since being novice is very hard when you arent going forward in a straight line.
that leads to the book being banned.
and those that knew of the poetry and found nothing wrong with the sentences of wisdom.. they fought to bring the book back.
and ever since then people have been re-writing the book and adding more lines of poetic wisedom.
any characters involved are that of a persons play thing.. otherwise the book would have made sense line for line.. paragraph to paragraph.. from subject matter to subject matter.
they are lines of artistic expression taken from a person's brain.
words can be crafted based on induced emotions.. we know this already.
so to look back and put the person under a sun baked sky.. it should all come to a philosphy of personality character influenced by whatever.
you take yourself to a place where the main person says 'god' and 100 different people have a different definition for the word.
not only is that irresponsible, it is unsafe, unorganized, rude to eachother, and disrespectful to the original writing.
there have been writings of the stars that are more glamorous than the bible.
since some of the stars are still there and the folklore is much less than that of what food you had been eating, mixed with your dna.. and thus creating the personality profile used to write the book.
i see the bible as a painting where the painter took some paint and splashed it on the canvas.
maybe if there was something visually seen that makes coherent sense, then the painter drops everything and fills in what they see to help others see the same thing (or to capture the vision and go with it as inspiration)
no religion of a god can hold themselves into a light of respect when their views are the talk of spirit and being.
it doesnt mix with the math or the science.
changing things to make it fit for you in manipulation and a serious sign of a personality defect (or future problem with socialism).
people absorb into the crap as if it is history, and because it is poorly written.. they should have left it alone as trash.
nothing you can say about giving nature a new name.
yes, people have the free will to take a situation and give it an artistic 'name' or 'label'
but
as reality has it.. if it was used once for something else, you really shouldnt exert yourself with slander.
since the book had an original date and an original form.. everybody is guilty, and it is all trash, and none of it is logic unless a person has manipulated something and given a reason to frown upon them.
as it could have been seen fit way back then.. if anybody tried to change or re-define something, they could have been frowned upon as being some form of stupid.
adult humor in the hands of children is how i see it.
and quite frankly, i believe the adult joke has gone on for longer than it was intended to be welcome.
i dont feel i deserve to see 'in god we trust' on all of my money.
i dont gripe or moan about it much.. because there are far too many children with some adult humor.
the re-writing and disrespecting the original writing to form a more solid story has really annoyed me.
and in the art of war.. that generally means somebody is doing something right.
there is a mighty fine truth to be said here..
and that is, there are a lot more instances of beauty that can be talked upon with artistic expression.. rather than having somebody do it for you and repeat it for decades (and even centuries).
it is like hearing the joke 'why did the chicken cross the road' for like 2,000 years.
anything 'jesus' or 'god' or 'pray' .. these things are all of the same line of joke.
i am willing to bet 'pray' wasnt used the same way twice in the original writing.
i believe cave men had more to say than the dope heads that wrote the bible.
i know that some people feel the empowerment because the writings are very old.
and to that i say, why bother stopping at that point in history when you could go back further?
back to primitive times when things like a wheel or ladder was 'pimpin' and the psychology of situations was also written down.
i think religions are for people screaming and shouting 'save me' .. and the only person they need saved from (for starters) is themselves.
and of course i am disgusted by it.
work of art isnt to be played with, and given the permission didnt seem to help.
intentions are the basic principle.. not the results.. as that is my belief of art.
to only make matters worse, we have to share the world with these idiots.
meaning our children become susceptible to whatever queer games they play.. as well as adult innocence subjected to the same hinderence.
i dont find it lawful really.. as i know people are always allowed to make the wrong decision and be judged for it later.
the recession is always going to be difficult to clean up at times.. but this wild fire of a mess with religion is a much bigger beast.
so big in fact, that the people have taken the 'responsibility' to re-write the book and make some sense out of it to keep the rioting crowds from causing more trouble than they already bring upon to themselves.
a lot of things for people to soak up and absorb are far too old and outdated.
we have the pledge of allegiance that is trash
the star spangled banner that is trash
american anthem that is trash
etc etc etc
gets to the point where holding up an american flag is almost a dead giveaway that you are worth less.
the government body doesnt do a whole lot to provide a way for them to be an emotional crutch.
and that goes all the way to speaking about the FCC and the FTC or the FDA .. as these organizations are very often used, and havent done a whole lot to earn respect.
they are scraping on a bare minimum, and people complain about taxes while leaving these organizations completely out of the picture.
to that i say 'small-minded them'