tamalero
Distinguished
well, you really can't think of it that way, because saying 10% per core is like saying a 3ghz quad is actually 12ghz
you sure you graduated high school and passed your math class?
:|
well, you really can't think of it that way, because saying 10% per core is like saying a 3ghz quad is actually 12ghz
MAKE THE BAD MAN STOP. I WANT MY MOMMY.
\
<= Serf Pope
Hint:
(A) Visit a few Intel overclocking forums to establish Conroe's overclockability. Oh ... wait ... my bad. AMD fanbois think overclocking means +10% clock speeds :lol:
(B) Re-read the articles describing 45 nm transistor technologies (which AMD/IBM are madly scrambling to catch up with now) ... you may have to turn off your AMD fanboi Reality Distortion Field (RDF) to get the gist of the artcle.
(C) A + B makes 3.3-3.7 GHZ launch clocks seem conservative.
No, AMD isn't claiming a performance lead over K8, Wombat, they're claiming 1.8 and 1.4 over CLOVERTOWN.
MAKE THE BAD MAN STOP. I WANT MY MOMMY.
\
<= Serf Pope
Hint:
(A) Visit a few Intel overclocking forums to establish Conroe's overclockability. Oh ... wait ... my bad. AMD fanbois think overclocking means +10% clock speeds :lol:
(B) Re-read the articles describing 45 nm transistor technologies (which AMD/IBM are madly scrambling to catch up with now) ... you may have to turn off your AMD fanboi Reality Distortion Field (RDF) to get the gist of the artcle.
(C) A + B makes 3.3-3.7 GHZ launch clocks seem conservative.
MAKE THE BAD MAN STOP. I WANT MY MOMMY.
\
<= Serf Pope
Hint:
(A) Visit a few Intel overclocking forums to establish Conroe's overclockability. Oh ... wait ... my bad. AMD fanbois think overclocking means +10% clock speeds :lol:
(B) Re-read the articles describing 45 nm transistor technologies (which AMD/IBM are madly scrambling to catch up with now) ... you may have to turn off your AMD fanboi Reality Distortion Field (RDF) to get the gist of the artcle.
(C) A + B makes 3.3-3.7 GHZ launch clocks seem conservative.
MAKE THE BAD MAN STOP. I WANT MY MOMMY.
\
<= Serf Pope
Hint:
(A) Visit a few Intel overclocking forums to establish Conroe's overclockability. Oh ... wait ... my bad. AMD fanbois think overclocking means +10% clock speeds :lol:
(B) Re-read the articles describing 45 nm transistor technologies (which AMD/IBM are madly scrambling to catch up with now) ... you may have to turn off your AMD fanboi Reality Distortion Field (RDF) to get the gist of the artcle.
(C) A + B makes 3.3-3.7 GHZ launch clocks seem conservative.
MAKE THE BAD MAN STOP. I WANT MY MOMMY.
\
<= Serf Pope
Hint:
(A) Visit a few Intel overclocking forums to establish Conroe's overclockability. Oh ... wait ... my bad. AMD fanbois think overclocking means +10% clock speeds :lol:
(B) Re-read the articles describing 45 nm transistor technologies (which AMD/IBM are madly scrambling to catch up with now) ... you may have to turn off your AMD fanboi Reality Distortion Field (RDF) to get the gist of the artcle.
(C) A + B makes 3.3-3.7 GHZ launch clocks seem conservative.
MAKE THE BAD MAN STOP. I WANT MY MOMMY.
\
<= Serf Pope
Hint:
(A) Visit a few Intel overclocking forums to establish Conroe's overclockability. Oh ... wait ... my bad. AMD fanbois think overclocking means +10% clock speeds :lol:
(B) Re-read the articles describing 45 nm transistor technologies (which AMD/IBM are madly scrambling to catch up with now) ... you may have to turn off your AMD fanboi Reality Distortion Field (RDF) to get the gist of the artcle.
(C) A + B makes 3.3-3.7 GHZ launch clocks seem conservative.
I mean how dare anyone want to see working silicon on an unreleased processor...
ok so again this is speculation and opnion.... u have no facts to prove penryn will clock at 3.3 - 3.7 ...if u have proof please post links
I mean how dare anyone want to see working silicon on an unreleased processor... i mean that makes them a AMD fanboi
so the K8L sucks in Oracle thread i made was to make AMD look good and INTEL look bad huh
the name calling is about to start...
My thoughts:
K8L will perform very well, will dominate most server spaces (and this is a very widely held opinion), but merely make life more difficult for Intel the desktop / mobile space, where things will be a pretty haggard contest between the two in terms of overall performance, IPC, different benchmarks, etc. (kind of like the K7/P4 days). Intel will probably hold the mobile space, though, unless AMD manages to sneak some nice stuff in there. The 65nm process for AMD is still in question (with the potential to either be very good and scale above 3Ghz or poor and go no higher than 90nm), and 45nm for Intel is probably going to turn out very well assuming baaaaad things don't happen.
A brief rundown of what's in my head.
i wanna wait and see.... so that makes me a AMD paid shill
This thread is never going to end, some one needs to admit defeat ***couch****lordpope****
taco's leaving now, getting bored of this
This thread is never going to end, some one needs to admit defeat ***couch****lordpope****
taco's leaving now, getting bored of this
yes, but the mass dumb buyer most likely won't be running a quad core, probably some cheap pentium d or x2 3600 because it's all the same to them. But considering the enthusiast market is 15%, that's a big chunk to satisfy
If any of you guys don't like the new thg frontpage, please vote here so we can show the dude in charge the results
http://forumz.tomshardware.com/community/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=453204#453204
This thread is never going to end, some one needs to admit defeat ***couch****lordpope****
taco's leaving now, getting bored of this
yes, but the mass dumb buyer most likely won't be running a quad core, probably some cheap pentium d or x2 3600 because it's all the same to them. But considering the enthusiast market is 15%, that's a big chunk to satisfy
If any of you guys don't like the new thg frontpage, please vote here so we can show the dude in charge the results
http://forumz.tomshardware.com/community/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=453204#453204
This thread is never going to end, some one needs to admit defeat ***couch****lordpope****
taco's leaving now, getting bored of this
yes, but the mass dumb buyer most likely won't be running a quad core, probably some cheap pentium d or x2 3600 because it's all the same to them. But considering the enthusiast market is 15%, that's a big chunk to satisfy
If any of you guys don't like the new thg frontpage, please vote here so we can show the dude in charge the results
http://forumz.tomshardware.com/community/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=453204#453204