Best Gaming CPUs For The Money: January 2012 (Archive)

Page 38 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.
As gaming resolutions climb ever higher and graphic cards become more powerful, the CPU is becoming less of an impediment

I'm a late adopter, anyway, so what would interest me is more CPU testing on modern video cards at higher resolutions (not that I'll be making a move to 2560x1440 anytime soon). Let's see what those 920s and 965s can do.

(not asking for much, huh?)

 

Not really. The article is based on regular everyday prices. Not deal-of-the-day in-store-only prices from a single retailer that most people do not have access to.

If I wanted to buy a discounted CPU from Microcenter, it would probably cost me over $100 in gas for the trip.
 

They should simply create a new article for each iteration instead of overwriting the previous one. This way, you get a new comment thread for each update and the ability to look up past versions to see how things have progressed.
 



Lol, fellow Atlanta native I take it?
 




Pretty much every LGA1155 board has PCIe3.0 support, if used with an Ivy chip.
 
Do PC owners only game? I just recently upgraded my 3820 to a 4930K, altho the FPS stayed the same with my CFx3 HD7970's, I can tell you for certain its a much much smoother experience.... I'm a casual gamer at best, multi-tasking is where its at...
 
Ok, I am still waiting to buy, but now it seems that I am waiting for a mb that a Haswell E can be dropped into when they show up in 14. It seems like that will be the first daylight for the long side-lined gamers looking for a decent halflife on a tech powerup.
 
Question: Why benchmark both Starcraft 2 and Skyrim (both relying heavily on single threaded power). Why not bench Crysis 3 / Battlefield 4 for the other side of the spectrum?
 

crysis 3 and bf4 single player are gpu bound, mostly. crysis 3 can tax cpus depending on where it's benchmarked, but it's mostly gpu bound. bf4 m.p. and other multiplayer games are near-inpossible to bench because no two m.p. runs are similar. sites who test m.p. games are aware of this.

edit: i too, would like to see either starcraft or skyrim be replaced by another mainstream game.
 


The 970 BE consisted of two different types, the Deneb, and the Zosma. The Zosma was said to had a higher OC than the Deneb, and had an actual 6 cores, with two disabled. Whether or not it's just as good as the 6300 however, I would think they're probably closer than thought. because you really can't take the 6300 too high with 6 modules anyhow.

I got unlucky and bought a Deneb :pfff: But there are some that said they got 4.2 GHZ out of it. Hmmm...
 

Valid point, that is why purchasing a laptop is more difficult than a desktop... the reviews are minimal...
 
When this argument i made, then something is wrong eith their tests. Try going into a 64 player BF4 match using an i3 or i5 and see how your cpu will be choked to death, giving you fps drops because the cpu is ranging near 100%.

The tests that these guys make are static and do not reflect real-life mp perf.

For example sli/cf or 120 hz users see quite a big difference between a high end i7 and an i5. According to these benches, some brainless noobs think they can get the same performance from a 120 $ i3 cpu. In reality, there is just no universe in which an i7 and an i3 can REALLY compete.

HT has a massive advantage-it takes strain off the cpu. My i5 2500k is dying in bf4.



 
What about the 4820k? You readily list the 3770k and 3930k, but the 4820k is lower in price than the 3770k, and yet has more PCIe lanes to work with for SLI/Crossfire. Sure, it uses a more expensive series of motherboards for single gpu setups, but when you get into multi-gpu setups, the z77 winds up more expensive than the x79 because they have to add a bridge chip. I find the 4820k to be a much better value than the 3770k.
 

There are almost no games where there is a significant difference between x8 and x16 on PCIe 3.0 so there is no need for a PCIe switch for x8x8 SLI/CFX setups. The switches become necessary only when you start looking into triple or quad GPU setups.
 
Why can't the 6300 just get a solid suggestion already ? It's a much more well rounded CPU capable of higher performance than the i3 in both gaming and productivity. Plus it cost's less and is surrounded by less expensive components. The tides are changing and basically every new gen game i play (C3, BF3, BF4,AC4) all use more than 2 cores. The dual core is a dying breed in the gaming arena. The only reason they make it look good is by still keeping single thread dinosaur titles in the benches (cough, skyrim cough starcraft cough) Replace these antiquated titles with a suite of modern games and you will see first hand the strength the FX 6300 holds over the i3.
 

Yes, high-end new-generation games exist... but they represent only a relatively tiny slice (less than 5%) of the overall market.
 

It is not capable of higher performance than the Core i3 in gaming. It costs slightly less, but the components around it are not less expensive. If you want overclocking, they're actually more expensive.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.