esquire468
Distinguished
[citation][nom]JohnnyLucky[/nom]It gets a little confusing with so many categories.[/citation]
I agree. It seems to me the categories keep growing and we have a price point for practically every single card. It's getting to the point that there is no point. Do we really need "Best Cards for..." every $10 difference? For example, the 9800 GT at under $100, the GTS 250/512MB at $110 and the GTS 250/1GB at $120.
Why not create fixed price points at certain intervals and stick to them? It's almost as if some of these shifting price points are created to ensure that every card is represented so the fanboys are happy; however it gets to the point that all you are doing is listing all the cards off newegg from bottom to top. I appreciate all the hard work you guys do here, but this is getting a little too crowded with all of these categories. Why not do categories every $25 for under $100, and then for every $50 and $100 thereafter? For instance - $50, $75, $100, $150, $200, $300, etc.? Just a thought.
I agree. It seems to me the categories keep growing and we have a price point for practically every single card. It's getting to the point that there is no point. Do we really need "Best Cards for..." every $10 difference? For example, the 9800 GT at under $100, the GTS 250/512MB at $110 and the GTS 250/1GB at $120.
Why not create fixed price points at certain intervals and stick to them? It's almost as if some of these shifting price points are created to ensure that every card is represented so the fanboys are happy; however it gets to the point that all you are doing is listing all the cards off newegg from bottom to top. I appreciate all the hard work you guys do here, but this is getting a little too crowded with all of these categories. Why not do categories every $25 for under $100, and then for every $50 and $100 thereafter? For instance - $50, $75, $100, $150, $200, $300, etc.? Just a thought.