[citation][nom]jackoff[/nom]@jakallReally? A blatant copy of MW? Don't you mean a blatant copy of well I don't know, the hundreds of war movies/books/tv shows that came out before MW? Also, if you had put any research into the BF series, BF has always been about the multiplayer experience.[/citation]
The hundreds of war movies/books/tv shows that came out before MW are not video games. This IS a video game. Copied from ANOTHER VIDEO GAME. So, this is a copy. MW series is ok, because is allows you to play a video game, instead of buying a book, going to a movie, etc. It is ok, because it is PLAYABLE. It draws you in. The story is there. The action is there. It is fun stuff.
BF3... not so much. The story does not draw you in. The action sucks, is just a bad copy paste from MW, but without giving you the feeling you are there. That is the whole point of a video game. To put you in the character`s shoes, and to dive you in. BF3 failed at this so badly.
And I said it in my first post, I do not need multi player. Single player only. So no comments complaining that BF series is all about multi player, I only buy a game for single player use. You can enjoy its multi player action all you want, for me it is irrelevant.