I didn't go through the whole video, but I found it and posts like
this one presenting misinformation with a sample size of one, in the post's case a cherry picked demonstration, and applying it as a blanket statement throughout the technology in general. Panel technology does have inherit limitations, yes, but at the end of the day, the
quality of the panel is what matters moreso than just the underlying technology. It's like saying an Atkinson Cycle combustion engine is always superior to an Otto Cycle one, but you used a high-end Prius for the Atkinson Cycle example and, I dunno, a POS Ford Pinto engine for the Otto Cycle one
I mean heck, I'll keep pointing this
TFT Central review of the ASUS PG287Q, a TN panel monitor, where they managed to color calibrate it such that it achieved basically a near perfect score, beating out Dell's Ultrasharp monitors, a lineup
that's used for media production work.
The Samsung Odyssey G7 is one of the best VA monitors, may I ask what you think to the curve?
It's jarring for a bit, but you get used to it. I don't even really notice when I go back to a flat panel.
You can't really compare IPS to TN, the difference between the two in viewing angles and colour accuracy is night and day but your correct every technology has it's strength and weaknesses.
See my link on the color accuracy part. TN panels just lack color
precision. But yes, the viewing angle is an inherit problem of the technology.