Bootable vs non-bootable

[Guest]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

Am I correct that a full version of Win9X will boot, but an upgrade version
will not?

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

As far as I know, retail versions of 9x systems were never bootable. OEM's made recovery CD's that were bootable.

--
Doug Knox, MS-MVP Windows Media Center\Windows Powered Smart Display
Win 95/98/Me/XP Tweaks and Fixes
http://www.dougknox.com
--------------------------------
Per user Group Policy Restrictions for XP Home and XP Pro
http://www.dougknox.com/xp/utils/xp_securityconsole.htm
--------------------------------
Please reply only to the newsgroup so all may benefit.
Unsolicited e-mail is not answered.

"Gordon Nelson" <popop3@verizon.net> wrote in message news:UUOee.33$U01.26@trnddc07...
> Am I correct that a full version of Win9X will boot, but an upgrade version
> will not?
>
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

No version of Win9x (to my knowledge) is bootable. You start the install by
inserting the setup floppy and booting from that.

--
Regards,

Richard Urban

aka Crusty (-: Old B@stard

If you knew as much as you think you know,
You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!


"Gordon Nelson" <popop3@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:UUOee.33$U01.26@trnddc07...
> Am I correct that a full version of Win9X will boot, but an upgrade
> version will not?
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

I recall seeing a few self booting Windows 98 SE Full versions. IIRC no
Upgrade versions were bootable.
--

Harry Ohrn MS-MVP [Shell/User]
www.webtree.ca/windowsxp


"Gordon Nelson" <popop3@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:UUOee.33$U01.26@trnddc07...
> Am I correct that a full version of Win9X will boot, but an upgrade
> version will not?
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

I never saw a retail version that was bootable - full or upgrade.
I did see OEM versions that was bootable

--
Jon Hildrum
DTS MVP
Jon_Hildrum@msn.com
www.hildrum.com
"Harry Ohrn" <harry---@webtree.ca> wrote in message
news:uTsXi2wUFHA.3152@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>I recall seeing a few self booting Windows 98 SE Full versions. IIRC no
>Upgrade versions were bootable.
> --
>
> Harry Ohrn MS-MVP [Shell/User]
> www.webtree.ca/windowsxp
>
>
> "Gordon Nelson" <popop3@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:UUOee.33$U01.26@trnddc07...
>> Am I correct that a full version of Win9X will boot, but an upgrade
>> version will not?
>>
>
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics (More info?)

Yes I think you are right Jon. The bootable versions were OEMs as I recall.

--

Harry Ohrn MS-MVP [Shell/User]
www.webtree.ca/windowsxp


"Jon_Hildrum" <Jon_Hildrum@amsn.com> wrote in message
news:eIhQsCyUFHA.3544@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>I never saw a retail version that was bootable - full or upgrade.
> I did see OEM versions that was bootable
>
> --
> Jon Hildrum
> DTS MVP
> Jon_Hildrum@msn.com
> www.hildrum.com
> "Harry Ohrn" <harry---@webtree.ca> wrote in message
> news:uTsXi2wUFHA.3152@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>>I recall seeing a few self booting Windows 98 SE Full versions. IIRC no
>>Upgrade versions were bootable.
>> --
>>
>> Harry Ohrn MS-MVP [Shell/User]
>> www.webtree.ca/windowsxp
>>
>>
>> "Gordon Nelson" <popop3@verizon.net> wrote in message
>> news:UUOee.33$U01.26@trnddc07...
>>> Am I correct that a full version of Win9X will boot, but an upgrade
>>> version will not?
>>>
>>
>>
>
>