crow_smiling
Distinguished
You are missing my point. Do you think that it is likely that the chip that Anandtech used was actually running at 4GHz at 1.15V? If not, then CPU-Z is inaccurate when reporting VCore with this ES chip. If CPU-Z was inaccurate with this chip, could it not also have been inaccurate with the ES chip that TOMs had?AGAIN, that is under load, look at the multiplier, it is at 9(4ghz), not 6 (1.6ghz), so speedstep is not applied at that moment (it is in the bios, just that system load is so high that is hasn't dropped down yet.) My comp goes to, according to CPUZ, to 1.280V uderload (2 instances of Prime95) and RMclock says the normal 1.35V. I will look around for non ES but that is not the point.
I’m speaking from experience as someone that has just sold an ES Core Duo on eBay. I had the same problem with CPU-Z reporting false voltages. But don’t take my word for it, go over to Xtreme forums and see all the screenshots with CPU-Z showing erroneous VCore values and ask around.
Hey, maybe you are right; if so please come back here and tell us the good news.