Call Of Duty: Ghosts Graphics Performance: 17 Cards, Tested

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.


 
for 1080p gaming the vram amount makes zero difference. Your software says your using an x amount of ram to run a particular game but that don't mean it needs it to run it sufficiently. if it' s there it will take it. My 280x with 3gb in arma 3 uses it all,. however my 680 plays same game pretty much the same with only 2gb.Same bf4 and few other titles.
 
I almost solved my problem with cod ghosts,i put the new version graphic nvidia(680lsli my vga) drivers v 1.6.1.0 and the game run much better.No problem with gun shoot at his own,bullets every where without control...lol.

But when i shut the game, a windows massage suddenly appears and says about windows aero, that there not enough resourses, and my pc performance is poor...and to change settings and bla bla, maybe i should try....
 


 


 


It depends entirely on the game and the number and size of on-screen textures and other objects whether VRAM makes a difference. It makes a MASSIVE difference in BF4.

Side note - you spelled "too" incorrectly in your signature.
 


 
Ok, so it does make a difference. At 1080p i didn't really notice it between the aforementioned two cards.

Side note - Yes, thanks. I was 'four sheets to the wind' at the time. I think i'll remove it completely, as it appears rather arrogant sober.
 
I had the same porblem. Settings on low and still had a crappy performance. Then i read this article, switched image quality to extra, badabum got 60 fps and the game looks good...the scaling seems to drain a hell of a performance
 
Status
Not open for further replies.